Generational Dynamics Forum - New Site

Higgenbotham wrote: Sat Sep 12, 2026 12:50 pm I didn't move as quickly with the conversion from double inverse to triple inverse as planned in this previous post, but as of the end of this week I have converted 93% of my accounts from double inverse to triple inverse. I looked for places where I could likely get a short term bounce when making the conversion, which was difficult. This week, the market was nervous about the inflation number and it will typically have some volatility in front of a release like this so I was able to take advantage of that. Though the volatility was more than I anticipated. I will be looking for someplace to do the last 7% as soon as possible and maybe the 10 year will cross the 5.0 to 5.3 percent area if I am lucky. Crossing 5.3 percent would take the 10 year to the highest level since 2002.

https://finance.yahoo.com/chart/%5ETNX# ... VzIjp7fX0=

I did the last 7% last week and am 100% in triple inverse. The 10 year has been up to multi year highs the past 2 days, climbing more today, but not over 5.3%. Meantime, some are explaining why that is not a problem. If the stock market collapses, then some will explain why it is a problem after the fact. AI says we're not in a Puetz crash window and it says even if we were it doesn't matter. But we are in a Puetz crash window and the fact nobody is talking about it is a good thing if you are looking for a crash.

I don't know what it will take to break this thing because everything that I thought would has already happened. For instance, birth rates fell for a few years, maybe 7 or 8 years, before the 1929 and 1966 tops but this time around they have already fallen more from the 2007 peak in birth rates, I think it was.



I think they're looking for 3.55 million births this year, down a bit from 2025, which was down a bit from 2024. You can say everything is moving more slowly in the new dark age as all available reserves are used to prop things up.