https://youtu.be/25LUF8GmbFU
I Was An MIT Educated Neurosurgeon Now I'm Unemployed And Alone In The Mountains How Did I Get Here?
I Was An MIT Educated Neurosurgeon Now I'm Unemployed And Alone In The Mountains How Did I Get Here?
Report: Kyle Busch collapsed Wednesday in simulator
https://muddyrivernews.com/opinion/dai ... 522071407/At this point, the cause of death has not been released and details remain limited.
What is known is that Busch was testing in the Chevrolet racing simulator in Concord on Wednesday when he became unresponsive and was transported to a hospital in Charlotte, several people familiar with the situation told The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because details have not been disclosed by Busch’s team or family.
The mega-talented — and controversial — NASCAR driver had died. Suddenly.
What?
I immediately thought back to Sunday’s NASCAR all-star race at Dover (Del.), when Busch said late in the day and he was not feeling well and might need to leave the race. He managed to finish, but immediately sought medical attention.
Four days later, the 41-year-old, two-time NASCAR Cup champ had passed.
No cause of death has been reported for Busch, who during his career found himself in the eye or more NASCAR storms than any other two drivers combined. His nickname of “Rowdy” was well-earned and well-deserved. He was always must-see TV, off and on the track.
In memory of those who “died suddenly” in the United States and worldwide, May 11-18, 2026
LAPD Det. Mark Furman (C); actors Tom Kane, Dennis Rush, Donald Gibb; filmmaker Brian Lindstrom; B'way actor Russell Garrett; rockers Ike Willis, Dennis Locorriere; rock producer Jack Douglas; & more
A survey of the likely global toll of COVID “vaccination,” based on the reports collected by our worldwide team of researchers this past week.
A federal appeals court has vacated a landmark decision that found fluoridated drinking water poses an “unreasonable risk” to children’s health under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA).
The decision by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals did not challenge the substance of the lower court’s findings — that fluoride is toxic to children and ought to be regulated. Instead, the court based its decision on procedural issues related to the lower court’s handling of the litigation.
The case will now go back to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, where District Judge Edward Chen will be required to exclude all scientific evidence that became available after 2020.
Michael Connett, attorney for the plaintiffs, told The Defender the court “instructed Judge Chen to travel back in time to 2020 and make this ruling based on a stale factual record.”
Connett said the directive to ignore years’ worth of evidence on fluoride’s dangers runs counter to the intent of the TSCA — which is to protect hundreds of millions of Americans from substances that are harmful to human health.
The federal appeals court ruling, handed down late Thursday, stemmed from a lawsuit against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) brought by consumer advocacy groups including Food & Water Watch, the Fluoride Action Network (FAN), and Moms Against Fluoridation.
The groups sued after the EPA refused to consider their 2016 citizens’ petition asking the agency to regulate fluoride.
After two bench trials, Chen ruled that fluoride at the federally recommended concentration of 0.7 milligrams/liter (mg/L) posed an “unreasonable risk” to children’s health and ordered the EPA to regulate it accordingly.
However, the 9th Circuit panel said the lower court violated the “party presentation principle” — a legal doctrine requiring courts to act as neutral arbiters rather than taking control of a case’s factual development.
Blame the Patient: The Medical Gaslighting Crisis Hiding in Plain Sight
This clip of Dr. Peter Hotez is an extreme case of medical gaslighting that is easy to spot. But what about when it’s not?
Something seismic has happened to public health in America—and most people haven’t fully processed its scale.
A 2025 JAMA study surveying pregnant mothers and parents of young children found that only 37% fully trusted the CDC vaccine schedule and planned to follow it completely.
Five years ago, a number that low would have been unimaginable.
So what’s causing the drop? And what does it mean?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 47 guests