Generational Dynamics World View News

[Phong Tran]

Sharing a link from Professor Jiang in relations to his Game Theory of the US/Israel - Iran War. I enjoy watching his 'theories' because they're probably about as neutral as one can be, and he makes connections that haven't been made apparent in other places.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jIS2eB-rGv0

Starting around the 30mins mark, he makes a couple connections that I found interesting.

1. The US-Israel attacking Iran and the Middle East creates an energy catalyst for Europe that will force them to side with the US to ensure their future energy supply, whether they want to or not (ie. securing US interests).
2. The term Blue Gold, which has been floating around conspiracy theorists forums for a while as a dystopian future world could actually be the US' game plan in the Middle East, as the ME countries utilize more water then their environments can produce (which is why Iran is attacking water desalination stations of puppet ME countries)
3. Iran's possible geopolitical strategy of galvanizing Shia population in other countries to protest and cause an uprising with Israel and US as their enemies, eventually escalating towards a Shia/Sunni Muslim Jihad with Iran as the center of the Islamic Caliphate (which could coincide with John's prediction of the Clash of Civilizations). This could cause massive internal civic issues in many European and western countries due to immigration of Muslims who may answer the call to Jihad.

However, I remember that John mentioned that Iran's generation was an awakening one and that they would be on the side of US against China in the Clash of Civilizations war and maybe they will be, but maybe they aren't initially just like the USSR wasn't on the side of the allies in WWII.

In regards to the belief that the US will come out on top, I'm not sure that will be the case. I believe it ends because humanity is pushed to the point where if country A goes any further against country B that Nuclear War would be the only answer, and at that point, both sides agree to just end the war. The US will be like how Great Britain was, starting their decline, while China, having suffered as well, but not having as many immigration issues, thus having a more cohesive population, will accelerate faster to becoming the next century superpower.

[Fullmoonn]

That's some good stuff Phong but...

Code: Select all

thus having a more cohesive population, will accelerate faster to becoming the next century superpower.

THIS is speculative conjecture based upon a common incorrect hypothesis.
Mao Ze Deng WAS effective at getting rid of Chinese cultural history. Just the fact that cannabalism happened during his starvation event, . which was just policy stupidity, but then followed by 10 years of outright inhuman psychosis and mass murder (probably also contributing to cannabalism) means that an entire generation was permanently scarred and ruined. Thay now govern the nation and they're even crazier than our Epstein clique running our own country.
Their children of course had crazy parents and a society in fragments. You might assume that it could be cohesive in some ways but in other ways ( fundamental generationally speaking)!! they're merely repeating the few ancient ways that we're somewhat preserved but only in a superficial way. They're sociopathic and nihilistic (we're talking about Communist China) and in the end actually seem to want to go down in flames rather than make the world a better place and in this manner they're much like our great friend and ally who's sucked us into a disaster and ruinous war.

[Fullmoonn]

Sharing a link from Professor Jiang in relations to his Game Theory of the US/Israel - Iran War. I enjoy watching his 'theories' because they're probably about as neutral as one can be, and he makes connections that haven't been made apparent in other places.

He's a really smart guy who is quite compelling, but...
Consider that he grew up in Canada, went to Yale and then decided after some time that Beijing would be a good place to raise his kids. I lived in Beijing for 3 years and have deep connections there still. I'm about the same age as Jiang also with little kids. Having lived there, I certainly wouldn't consider it ideal for living/ raising kids. He's in Beijing acting certainly under the perview of the government. Therefore be very careful about charlatans and tricksters. Seems they're coming out of the woodwork as we descend into the depths of crisis.

[Phong Tran]

Sharing a link from Professor Jiang in relations to his Game Theory of the US/Israel - Iran War. I enjoy watching his 'theories' because they're probably about as neutral as one can be, and he makes connections that haven't been made apparent in other places.

He's a really smart guy who is quite compelling, but...
Consider that he grew up in Canada, went to Yale and then decided after some time that Beijing would be a good place to raise his kids. I lived in Beijing for 3 years and have deep connections there still. I'm about the same age as Jiang also with little kids. Having lived there, I certainly wouldn't consider it ideal for living/ raising kids. He's in Beijing acting certainly under the perview of the government. Therefore be very careful about charlatans and tricksters. Seems they're coming out of the woodwork as we descend into the depths of crisis.

I agree that everything should be taken with a grain of salt and that the CCP allow him to teach and spread his theories because they highlight the decline of the US empire and the rise of China as the next superpower. Again, I like to take in different viewpoints and worldviews because what we think others value, we may only believe that because we sometimes project our own values onto them. Ray Dalio, in his Rise and Fall of Civilizations also believes that China will rise to be the next superpower. Everything is speculative, and while their theories are based on past empires and superpowers, I'm not sure I'd go as far as implying them to be charlatans and tricksters.

The fact that he had a western education, lived in the west, and still moved his children to Beijing probably says a lot more of his belief in the western decline and rise of China in the future, and is hoping for the best for his children and grandchildren. I have no illusions that the CCP is not the greatest government at this time, however, after having lived 45 years in Canada, the hypocrisy of the western oligarchy has also not been lost on me either. So I guess the question becomes how ingrained is the corruption in both governments and which one do we believe will right their ship before all is said and done. I'd prefer it to be both governments, and it certainly could be the US and not China, I'm just not seeing it based on how divisive the Democratic and Republican parties are towards each other. Lastly, when I hypothesize about the rise of China, I'm literally talking 50-100 years, with the peak in 150 years, so definitely not talking about the next 10 years.