Religion and Vaccine Arguments

[tim]

https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/bre ... d-vaccines

BREAKING/URGENT: mRNA COVID VACCINES KILLED AT LEAST 10 KIDS, THE FDA REPORTS

An FDA review found the shots to blame for the deaths, FDA's new vaccine chief - Dr. Vinay Prasad - told staffers in an email. The agency will tighten standards on new vaccine approval, Prasad wrote.

BREAKING: Food and Drug Administration scientists have found Covid mRNA jabs killed at least 10 children, the FDA’s chief vaccine regulator told staffers Friday.

The real number of children and teenagers killed by mRNA vaccines is likely much higher, Dr. Vinay Prasad - wrote in a six-page note to staffers. After looking at 96 deaths of kids aged 7-16, FDA reviewers found 10 “died after and because of receiving COVID-19 vaccination,” Prasad wrote.

The death toll of 10 depends on voluntary reporting and is almost certainly a significant underestimate, Prasad wrote. In addition, the FDA reviewers excluded cases where records were ambiguous.

The FDA’s age range was also narrow — and did not include older teens or young adults, like Simone Scott, a Northwestern University student who died of myocarditis-induced heart failure weeks after receiving the Moderna shot.1

Prasad acknowledged the possibility Covid shots killed more children than they saved.

“Healthy young children who faced tremendously low risk of death were coerced, at the behest of the Biden administration, via school and work mandates, to receive a vaccine that could result in death,” he wrote.

Prasad did not disclose details of the mRNA-caused deaths, such as the exact age and sex of victims, which shots they had received, or the exact cause of death or timing after the shots.

He also did not disclose whether the FDA or Centers for Disease Control, which runs the federal vaccine safety database, had contacted parents to tell them their children’s deaths were Covid vaccine-caused.

[tim]

https://www.malone.news/p/prasad-fda-me ... plications

Prasad FDA Memo: Regulatory Implications

Yes, the investigation of VAERS childhood deaths is important. But Media is overlooking the big picture.

I spent my early Monday hours today doomscrolling through “X”, monitoring the outrage and consternation concerning FDA/CBER director Dr. Vinay Prasad’s “official” (actually unofficial “leaked”) acknowledgment that there have been COVID mRNA-induced vaccine deaths of children. Yes, I guess that is an important event, but I first became aware of these specific findings last summer in the context of my service at ACIP. So, it's pretty much yesterday’s news for me.

Because of how I first encountered the data and investigation findings, I am embargoed by FACA federal law from disclosing what I know of them. However, I can assure you that the findings of Dr. Tracy Beth Hoeg (FDA Office of the Commissioner, ACIP FDA liaison) are much more shocking than just the number and age of the vaccine-related deaths.

In reviewing the social media posts and chatter, what seems to be almost completely overlooked are the Regulatory policy components of this “leaked” internal memo from Director Prasad to his bureaucracy. When I wrote my initial essay last Saturday posting the letter with a brief introduction (titled “A Revolution in Vaccine Regulation and Approval”), it was the public policy changes being announced that struck me as revolutionary. I have been alerting parents to the risks of harm to children from the genetic COVID vaccines for many years now. Not surprisingly, I experienced a wave of concerted attacks for this from corporate media, internet trolls/bots, and even the Israeli and Spanish governments! But I stand by every word, and have been vindicated and validated since (including by this recent memo from CBER Director Dr. Prasad). The fact that pediatric deaths have occurred post coerced and mandated inoculation with these products is not news to me.

[tim]

https://drtenpenny.substack.com/p/tenpe ... minute-2f0

Tenpenny Monday Minute

Lies, and more lies, about flu shots in the elderly.

It’s not okay for journals to omit data, but that is exactly what the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) just did.

NEJM never published the data showing that Pfizer’s mRNA flu shot failed in the over-65 age group.

The shot offers almost no clinical benefit in adults 18-64, but that is not all. NEJM failed to publish data from older adults, and these data were from the SAME trial.

The over-65 age group is the group that supposedly benefits the most from these vaccines. You could even say that this age group is the entire reason these vaccines exist.

Where’s the accountability?

Instead, researchers buried the data in ClinicalTrials.gov, more than likely to give them an “out” that they really did “publish” the data. The real reason was that the data were out of sight, out of mind, far from the scrutiny of a pesky journal.

Diligent researchers began digging into the data and were stunned by what they found.

The bottom line? A supposedly upstanding, flagship journal has selectively reported findings…the very findings that often directly shape public health decisions.

There’s no accountability, and certainly no integrity.