9-Apr-18 World View -- Trump threatens 'big price to pay' after Assad's chemical weapons attack in Syria

[Guest]

Syria is a sovereign state, Assad using Chemical weapons or Mass Bombardments of Rebel controlled cities in a civil war that was started by the rebels does not change the fact that His regime is the legitimate government of Syria.

A different guest here.

How is Assad's government legit? What kind of elections were held to put him in power? There are elections in North Korea. Are they legit? Does the North Korean government have the right to torture, starve, and murder its own people? Your 'logic' is warped. With people like you, no wonder the world going down the drain.

Nations do not have the right to interfere in the internal affairs of other nations. The only exception is if a nation is attacked by another nation and even here it is only for the duration of hostilities. Otherwise the very idea of "sovereignty" becomes meaningless.

You must be Serbian.

[FishbellykanakaDude]

Syria is a sovereign state, Assad using Chemical weapons or Mass Bombardments of Rebel controlled cities in a civil war that was started by the rebels does not change the fact that His regime is the legitimate government of Syria.

A different guest here.

How is Assad's government legit? What kind of elections were held to put him in power? There are elections in North Korea. Are they legit? Does the North Korean government have the right to torture, starve, and murder its own people? Your 'logic' is warped. With people like you, no wonder the world going down the drain.

Nations do not have the right to interfere in the internal affairs of other nations. The only exception is if a nation is attacked by another nation and even here it is only for the duration of hostilities. Otherwise the very idea of "sovereignty" becomes meaningless.

It is not a RIGHT, but a "privilege" to interfere in the internal affairs of other nations.

There is no RIGHT to do it, but there is no "justifiable" LAW against doing it.

It is a RISK to interfere. Nations are fully within their "rights" to take whatever RISK they wish to take.

There is no LAW "above" the laws of a nation. "International Law" is an illusion. Every action a nation takes is a RISK.

The balance for "evil nations" is just interference by "good nations".

One can't outlaw the will to take risks.

..period.


Aloha! <shaka!>