Frank wrote:
> John, I know the English language is difficult to read but I
> thought you mastered it quite well. The NY Times article is not
> saying what you purport it says.

Bad John! Bad!
The facts that I referenced from the article were exactly what
the NYT article was saying - that Saddam had large quantities
of WMDs after all.
But I guess you're like the other guy who posted earlier
who thinks that "old sarin" doesn't count, even though it
kills just as thoroughly as "new sarin."
But you're right that I did not say what the NYT article said,
because NYT article larded the basic facts with left wing
interpretations designed to cover up their embarrassment and
humiliation that they've been proven wrong once more.
Loony-left liberals seem to lack the intellectual ability to
deal with facts, and just resort to name-calling for anything
they don't like. So whenever I point out some facts that
loony-left liberals don't like, they resort to names like
neanderthal, racist, misogynist or tinfoil. And now, thanks
to you, I can add one more to the list: illiterate.