15-Oct-14 World View -- NY Times reveals Saddam had WMDs

Discussion of Web Log and Analysis topics from the Generational Dynamics web site.
Frank

Re: 15-Oct-14 World View -- NY Times reveals Saddam had WMDs

Post by Frank »

John, I know the English language is difficult to read but I thought you mastered it quite well.

The NY Times article is not saying what you purport it says. :roll: Bad John! Bad!

Frank
John
Posts: 11501
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 12:10 pm
Location: Cambridge, MA USA
Contact:

Re: 15-Oct-14 World View -- NY Times reveals Saddam had WMDs

Post by John »

Frank wrote: > John, I know the English language is difficult to read but I
> thought you mastered it quite well. The NY Times article is not
> saying what you purport it says. :roll: Bad John! Bad!
The facts that I referenced from the article were exactly what
the NYT article was saying - that Saddam had large quantities
of WMDs after all.

But I guess you're like the other guy who posted earlier
who thinks that "old sarin" doesn't count, even though it
kills just as thoroughly as "new sarin."

But you're right that I did not say what the NYT article said,
because NYT article larded the basic facts with left wing
interpretations designed to cover up their embarrassment and
humiliation that they've been proven wrong once more.

Loony-left liberals seem to lack the intellectual ability to
deal with facts, and just resort to name-calling for anything
they don't like. So whenever I point out some facts that
loony-left liberals don't like, they resort to names like
neanderthal, racist, misogynist or tinfoil. And now, thanks
to you, I can add one more to the list: illiterate.
NoOneImportant

Re: 15-Oct-14 World View -- NY Times reveals Saddam had WMDs

Post by NoOneImportant »

Bravo, John. We differ a bit; you see their difficulty as one of literacy, I see them as considerably more nefarious. Not being nearly as tactful as you, my position is to let the deceitful degenerates rot in hell. They only seek to deceive, distract, and distort that they may influence the weak of mind, those who have little or no perspective, or those who will not take the time to verify and reveal the nature of the deceptions that they spew.

Once caught their retort is always the same... "... oh, you just misunderstood what I was saying, I just wasn't clear enough."

Thanks.
John
Posts: 11501
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 12:10 pm
Location: Cambridge, MA USA
Contact:

Re: 15-Oct-14 World View -- NY Times reveals Saddam had WMDs

Post by John »

Thanks, but just one correction: I wasn't calling him illiterate; I was
saying that he was calling me illiterate.
NoOneImportant

Re: 15-Oct-14 World View -- NY Times reveals Saddam had WMDs

Post by NoOneImportant »

Got it. That is also one of their initial default positions... "if only you just weren't so dumb." Only they are capable "aware."
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests