Generational Dynamics Forum - New Site

Got it. That is also one of their initial default positions... "if only you just weren't so dumb." Only they are capable "aware."

Thanks, but just one correction: I wasn't calling him illiterate; I was
saying that he was calling me illiterate.

Bravo, John. We differ a bit; you see their difficulty as one of literacy, I see them as considerably more nefarious. Not being nearly as tactful as you, my position is to let the deceitful degenerates rot in hell. They only seek to deceive, distract, and distort that they may influence the weak of mind, those who have little or no perspective, or those who will not take the time to verify and reveal the nature of the deceptions that they spew.

Once caught their retort is always the same... "... oh, you just misunderstood what I was saying, I just wasn't clear enough."

Thanks.

Frank wrote: > John, I know the English language is difficult to read but I
> thought you mastered it quite well. The NY Times article is not
> saying what you purport it says. Bad John! Bad!

The facts that I referenced from the article were exactly what
the NYT article was saying - that Saddam had large quantities
of WMDs after all.

But I guess you're like the other guy who posted earlier
who thinks that "old sarin" doesn't count, even though it
kills just as thoroughly as "new sarin."

But you're right that I did not say what the NYT article said,
because NYT article larded the basic facts with left wing
interpretations designed to cover up their embarrassment and
humiliation that they've been proven wrong once more.

Loony-left liberals seem to lack the intellectual ability to
deal with facts, and just resort to name-calling for anything
they don't like. So whenever I point out some facts that
loony-left liberals don't like, they resort to names like
neanderthal, racist, misogynist or tinfoil. And now, thanks
to you, I can add one more to the list: illiterate.

John, I know the English language is difficult to read but I thought you mastered it quite well.

The NY Times article is not saying what you purport it says. Bad John! Bad!

Frank

Whether Hussein's Iraq had deployable WMDs or not is rather a moot point if Hussein wasn't forthcoming on the UN resolutions to prove he didn't have them and was no longer a threat to his neighbors. He didn't comply, so what are what were we supposed to do? Just kinda hope he didn't have any?

I mean, we told him that he could avoid war by leaving Kuwait in 1990. He chose not to. We had to remove him. Had he pulled his troops out of Kuwait with a "My bad," history would have turned out different. But he lost, and we said you have to do X, Y, and Z, to end this conflict, or we going to have to take you out, and he didn't want to do it. WMDs or not, he failed to satisfy the conditions of his defeat, leading to a final invasion to end, as the UN called it, the conflict between Iraq and Kuwait. A lot of people separate the Gulf War from the Iraq War as independant wars, but they were part of the same war with the 11 year cease fire enforced by the northern and southern no-fly zones. So, in 2002, that war was still pretty much on-going, and it was only going to end with Hussein's compliance, or his removal. And he made his choice.

This is pretty interesting as well:
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2014 ... of-Baghdad

So they will be the "Flying Dutchmen" eh?

HuffPo had an article yesterday on Americans doing the same. Can't find it but ran across this:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/10/1 ... _ref=syria

But never fear it is still all our fault (as usual of course) :O
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/greg-mitc ... _ref=syria

In breaking news, Dutch biker gangs are going to Syria to fight with the Kurds. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... crime.html

Apparently Dutch law allows this. This is very much what happened in the run up to WWIII, with Col. Chennault and the 1st American Volunteer Group (Flying Tigers ) in China. The Flying Tigers had presidential authority to operate though.

I don't have a camp. Promises of active production of chemical weapons were not met. That's all there is to say about it.