Financial topics

Investments, gold, currencies, surviving after a financial meltdown
Higgenbotham
Posts: 7985
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 11:28 pm

Re: Financial topics

Post by Higgenbotham »

malleni wrote:Higgenbotham
I think that you are quite near the final answer.
Agreed also that it is shockingly that US government did nothing against this widespread fraud in Treasuries, but also "imaginary" stocks and gold derivates too.
And it is obviously deflationary... but Debt (credit) deflationary.
Somebody here (John perhaps) put a very good link from Wikipedia about history of money (and deflation too) and it explains quite much.
Here it is again:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of ... th_bankers
Obviously - deflation can happen in all sort of assets, but since credit is not direct an asset (just "looks" as one) deflation in credit has other implications.
Looking at the 17th Century private goldsmith bankers, the reserves that those bankers were holding were gold reserves and they were issuing banknotes based upon those reserves. I do agree we have a somewhat parallel situation today, but it is not the counterfeiting of US Treasuries. It is not exactly parallel though. The old goldsmith bankers were prone to issue more banknotes than they had gold on hand to redeem them (Actually, contemporaneous accounts show that is precisely what happened in the US banking system in the 1930's too, "The Bubble That Broke The World" being only one example). The Fed has played a slighly different game today. Under our banking system now, US Treasuries are held as reserves and are the equivalent to what gold was in the 1930's and under the old goldsmith banking system. As recently as 2 years ago, the Fed had US Treasuries on hand as assets and had issued an equal value of Federal Reserve Notes as liabilities. But, instead of increasing the Federal Reserve Notes outstanding, they did something different. They loaned out the US Treasuries and took in lesser quality debt. If you are holding Federal Reserve Notes, the parallel there would be that you may be holding the equivalent of an old goldsmith banknote.

The situation with US Treasuries is a bit different. Let's say the old goldsmith bankers had taken gold bars and hollowed them out, replacing the core with tungsten (tungsten has the same density as gold), then introduced those bars with tungsten cores into the marketplace. That is the situation we have today with US Treasuries. Going back to the goldsmith banking days, gold was still banking reserves in that system despite any counterfeiting that occurred, but you sure don't want to purchase a gold bar with a tungsten core unless you have a plan to get rid of it. So what you would probably do is go to the source like a gold refiner and purchase one there, and you might not necessarily want to hold goldsmith banknotes, although it might be OK if your goldsmith could distinguish between counterfeit and real gold bars. If counterfeiting of gold bars became widespread and generally acknowledged, then the secondary market for gold bars would essentially shut down. But as long as there was still a primary source for non counterfeit gold bars, the marketplace and monetary system could still function.

In today's market, we still know where to get good US Treasuries, but there is a further problem, that being that the value of US Treasuries are not uniform because default risk is a moving target. Meanwhile, all US Treasuries are counted as Central Bank reserves regardess of duration. As mentioned on the forum here, the value of US Treasuries is based upon the ability of the US government to tax and collect revenue to support the debt. One thing we do know. If default risk becomes a problem, the longer duration treasuries will lose value first, short term treasuries will stay near zero percent interest, the yield curve will steepen, and the economy will begin to shut down. That's what I believe will start to happen in the second half of this year. Despite talk of recovery, you don't see short term treasury bill interest rates moving any higher. Also, if the dollar system itself begins to suddenly collapse, nobody will want treasuries of any duration and interest rates across the curve will probably equalize while the price of gold skyrockets. It seems likely to me that the bond market will exert its discipline before the clowns at the Fed and Treasury are able to destroy the entire financial system. There isn't any guarantee of that though.
While the periphery breaks down rather slowly at first, the capital cities of the hegemon should collapse suddenly and violently.
StilesBC
Posts: 121
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 9:44 pm

Re: Financial topics

Post by StilesBC »

This is from Comstock partners via Zero Hedge
Attachments
comstock P-E.jpg
comstock P-E.jpg (32.12 KiB) Viewed 6298 times
drsteph
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 4:23 pm

Re: Financial topics

Post by drsteph »

I have been watching this rally with skepticism albiet from the long side (don't fight the tape). I believe that once the new administration fully came to terms with the mess they were facing there was an about-face on management. Initial attempts at honesty and repair turned into the same tactics used by their predecessors - obfuscation and jawboning. The palpable change between January-February and March-April is obvious. It probably was a decision based upon accellerating job losses and the fear of being accused of repeating the Great Depression. Perhaps it is not an unreasonable decision to buy time in such a circumstance, but it doesn't really change the final outcome.

Hence, the 'W' with a flat last leg that is coming. Modest recovery, principally in equities, fueled by a last round of credit-based binging from the repressed impulses of the consumer society. Last gasp for equity issuance to be sucked up by the auto-invest DCA crowd.

The toughest part about this whole exercise is that it is impossible to predict whether the equity markets will themselves rise or fall in valuation as they can be modified significantly by the value of the currency. Add to that intervention/manipulation on a scale not seen since the 30's and I don't see how anyone can really negotiate through this minefield without a loss, unless you are a short-term trader par excellence. And even then, you'll get shellacked from time to time. The pros can't grok it, so what realistic hope do you/we have? I'm going to remain invested in equities for a small portion of my portfolio as a wealth preservation technique even though I am cognizant that I may lose 50-80% further on that individual investment. However, since I can't predict the future as well as I would like to, I don't see an alternative.

These are exceptionally difficult and dangerous times. John - what does GD say about how many years from the crisis does it take for the pot to come to a boil? If we assume September was the flashpoint, when will we start seeing the political and social ramifications? The clock is certainly ticking.
wvbill
Posts: 65
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 9:46 pm

Re: Financial topics

Post by wvbill »

drsteph wrote:The toughest part about this whole exercise is that it is impossible to predict whether the equity markets will themselves rise or fall in valuation as they can be modified significantly by the value of the currency. Add to that intervention/manipulation on a scale not seen since the 30's and I don't see how anyone can really negotiate through this minefield without a loss, unless you are a short-term trader par excellence. And even then, you'll get shellacked from time to time. The pros can't grok it, so what realistic hope do you/we have?
Its impossible to play this market short or intermediate term -- we are playing against a stacked deck.

I don't know the mechanics of how they are doing it, but, I am convinced Giethner and Bernenke are channeling taxpayer money into the stock market to keep it up. They have clearly indicated that they are willing to do what ever it takes -- legal or not -- to accomplish their goal; which is to transfer wealth from the taxpayer to Wall Street.

Like John, I can only watch with complete disgust and dismay as each new action is even more unbelievable than the last. I see no long term outcome other than complete ruin resulting in revolution and quite possibly outright war.

Bill
John
Posts: 11501
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 12:10 pm
Location: Cambridge, MA USA
Contact:

Re: Financial topics

Post by John »

drsteph wrote: > These are exceptionally difficult and dangerous times. John - what
> does GD say about how many years from the crisis does it take for
> the pot to come to a boil? If we assume September was the
> flashpoint, when will we start seeing the political and social
> ramifications? The clock is certainly ticking.
Things like that can't be predicted, since they depend on chaotic
(in the sense of Chaos Theory) events.

However, we can look at historical analogies. You could say that
from the crash of 1929, it took 12 years until the bombing of Pearl
Harbor.

But that overlooks things that happened in the interim. America
passed the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act in June 1930, something that the
Japanese considered to be an act of war. Then, in September 1931,
Japan invaded Manchuria, and later northern China.

In 1931, that invasion of Manchuria did not trigger a larger war,
much as the crisis wars in Darfur and Sri Lanka today are not
triggering larger wars.

But today there are many regions where a regional war WOULD trigger a
world war. That was the concept I was aiming for in the following
2004 article:

** Six most dangerous regions in world
** http://www.generationaldynamics.com/cgi ... nger041120


Today, I would say that the situation in Pakistan is extremely
dangerous, and could spiral into a much larger war very quickly. The
same is true of the Mideast.

So the answer to your question is that we don't know, but it could
happen at any time.

Sincerely,

John
John
Posts: 11501
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 12:10 pm
Location: Cambridge, MA USA
Contact:

Re: Financial topics

Post by John »

jusme wrote: > I heard or read somewhere that a signal that there may be a "crash
> " was if the market goes down fast and oil goes up out of site
> that we were there? Was that stated here and /or any truth to that
> event ?
What you may be thinking of is "capitulation," where investors
suddenly give up any hope of making money in the market, and they all
sell at once, causing a major correction. That's supposed to mean
that other investors -- the ones "in the know" -- will then make a
lot of money as people come back into the market. The problem with
this harebrained concept is that all investors today are "in the
know," so there's no one left to capitulate. And when they do, there
won't be any quick recovery.

** Stock market rally raises cautious, anxious hope among investors.
** http://www.generationaldynamics.com/cgi ... 09#e090509


** Wall Street Journal and Birinyi Associates are lying about P/E ratios
** http://www.generationaldynamics.com/cgi ... 26#e090426


** The origins of the hare-brained 'capitulation' fallacy
** http://www.generationaldynamics.com/cgi ... 05#e081005


Sincerely,

John
freddyv
Posts: 305
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 4:23 am
Location: Oregon, USA
Contact:

Re: Financial topics

Post by freddyv »

An interesting quote from Gene Inger today:
What’s the worst case that could yield to a full new leg down later this year instead of the oft-promised recovery Government assures us is forthcoming? Instead of growth, what if America bankrupts, impoverishes, and marginalizes itself? What if cherished institutions fail widely? What happens when the police realize that their under-funded pension plans cannot support a decent retirement? Will they stay honest, or will they opt to survive like they sometimes do in ‘banana republics’ or Eastern Europe? These are questions the mainstream does not even begin to contemplate.
Gene Inger isn't a real well known name but he is in with a lot of people in the media and while he covers his tracks like a Louise L'Amour character being followed by injuns he obviously gets it that we are in a generational turn and he is as objective as any analyst I've come across.

And then this from Richard Russell, of Dow Theory fame:
It's now obvious that the Fed and the Treasury want, above all, to save the banks. Everything else is secondary. It's also increasingly obvious that the bankers own the nation and that Goldman Sachs runs the nation and the banks. The whole thing is so flagrant that my head spins. And what Goldman doesn't control, the Pentagon controls.

How about this -- AIG, the insurer which has been bailed out four times by the government to the tune of $180 billion has been named the "worst company in America" by readers of consumerist.com run by Consumer Reports. Some voters voted for Comcast as the worst until they heard that AIG, after receiving bail-out money, paid out big bonuses to employees. Considering AIG's wrong-way investments, giving out bonuses was disgusting and disgraceful. Will these guys stop at nothing in their greed?

How does Wall Street and these companies get away with these outrages? They get away with it because the public doesn't have the vaguest idea of what's happening or what Wall Street is doing.

Remember the old adage, "follow the money." Are you kidding? The public can't follow the money. They don't even understand what our money is today. Much less where the trillions are going.
Mr. Russell's comments are dead on and just about everyone who knows anything about the financial system knows that he speaks the truth. The problem is twofold, as I see it: most of the people who understand how crooked the system is are crooked themselves and can be bought off with a 30% bear market rally and the hope of "green shoots"; the vast majority of Americans don't know a damn thing about this sort of stuff and don't care as long as they've got porn on the web, American Idol of the boob tube and promises of having all their taxes paid by someone making over $250.000.00, while they get tax credits.

Having stated my views and expressed a bit of indignation I now suggest to all of you, and myself, that we keep our wits about us and do what makes sense. There is plenty of information for each of us to see what's coming. You can only run up the stock market for so long and then the trade is on the short side once again. The fools who jump in long now are going to really get burned. Those who insist that all is well are beyond help. As many are fond of saying lately, "we do have the investing opportunity of a lifetime", it's just not on the long side.

--Fred
StilesBC
Posts: 121
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 9:44 pm

Re: Financial topics

Post by StilesBC »

wvbill,

Goldman has essentially become the market since it was allowed to become a "supplemental liquidity provider" with essentially no competition.

This sounds like conspiracy territory, but to see Russell mention it above would have to make one think twice. The amount of total daily volume that is solely attributed to one LP has never been higher according to people I have talked to who prefer to remain nameless.

As a person who watches the everyday ticks myself, the "invisible hand" has been easily visible since last September. That said, I don't put much stock into market manipulation, because I don't believe it is possible to manipulate the market for longer than very short periods of time.
aedens
Posts: 5211
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 4:13 pm

Re: Financial topics

Post by aedens »

So, dear readers, please be aware that the following six posts will be removed at some point tonight as Zero Hedge is unable to underwrite and collect on average $10 million per REIT dilution events and thus afford any lawyers (except potentially for White & Case's Tom Lauria).

http://zerohedge.blogspot.com/2009/05/p ... er-10.html
http://zerohedge.blogspot.com/2009/05/s ... hoots.html
http://zerohedge.blogspot.com/2009/05/l ... -week.html
http://zerohedge.blogspot.com/2009/04/a ... -page.html
http://zerohedge.blogspot.com/2009/04/s ... 6-gdp.html
http://zerohedge.blogspot.com/2009/04/b ... lysts.html

As for the 500 or so websites that fervently and automatically repost and redistribute ZH content, well, those we have no control over.

Ghost's in the machine. We do not exist. We are aware. We know where this is going.
Boeing won the U.S. Special Operations Command contract on April 29, beating competition from Textron Inc.’s AAI Corp.,
L- 3’s Geneva Aerospace, BAE Systems Inc.’s Advanced Ceramics Research, and Navmar Applied Sciences Corp., McGraw said.
The contract with Boeing was the quickest way for the Navy to get the drones to the battlefield and ships

Aedens
John
Posts: 11501
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 12:10 pm
Location: Cambridge, MA USA
Contact:

Hell

Post by John »

I've been listening to some of the coverage of the Detroit auto
"bailout," and it appears to be a huge imminent disaster.

When Chrysler goes bankrupt, thousands of dealers will have to close.
When the GM "bailout" occurs, thousands of GM dealers will have to
close. Each dealership might have 20-100 employees, including sales,
accounting, repair, etc. This alone will directly cause thousands of
jobs to disappear.

As I understand it, the "bailout" provides for some money for "Tier
1" parts suppliers, who supply parts directly to the car
manufacturers. But there's no support for thousands of "Tier 2" parts
suppliers, many of whom will go bankrupt.

This will have further chain reaction effects, as restaurants,
shopping centers, suppliers to suppliers, and others will also not
have their outstanding invoices paid, and will also face bankruptcy.

This isn't something far in the future. This is happening this week
and next.

This will also result in a new spurt of foreclosures for people who
have lost their jobs and can't make their mortgage payments -- or
rental payments, for that matter.

Meanwhile we have this:
> Foreclosures: 'April was a shocker'

> A record number of foreclosure filings took place during April,
> but the number of repossessions fell 11%.

> NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Foreclosures in April exceeded even
> March's blistering pace with a record 342,000 homes receiving
> notices of default, auction notices or undergoing bank
> repossessions, according to a regular industry report.

> One of every 374 U.S. homes received a filing during the month,
> the highest monthly rate that RealtyTrac, an online marketer of
> foreclosed properties, has recorded in four-plus years of record
> keeping.

> "April was a shocker," said Rick Sharga, a spokesman for
> RealtyTrac. "I would have bet on a dip because March foreclosures
> were so high.

> Instead, filings inched up 1% from March and rose 32% compared
> with April 2008.

> There were 63,900 bank repossessions, the last stop in the
> foreclosure process. More than 1.3 million homes have now been
> lost to foreclosure since the market meltdown began in August
> 2007.

> The increasing foreclosures will force RealtyTrac to rethink its
> forecasts, according to Sharga. "We had been predicting 3.4
> million filings for the year," he said, "but we'll blow those
> numbers out of the water."

> http://money.cnn.com/2009/05/13/real_es ... 2009051306
After the 1929 crash, nothing much happened for about a year, after
which all hell broke loose. It looks like we're approaching that
point right now.

Sincerely,

John
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 2 guests