Generational Dynamics Forum - New Site

15-Mar-16 World View -- Saudi's Prince Faisal sharply rebukes Obama's 'free riders' accusation

The World View of President Barack Hussein Obama

** 15-Mar-16 World View -- Saudi's Prince Faisal sharply rebukes Obama's 'free riders' accusation
** http://www.generationaldynamics.com/pg/ ... tm#e160315



Contents:
Saudi's Prince Faisal sharply rebukes Obama's 'free riders' accusation
The World View of President Barack Hussein Obama


Keys:
Generational Dynamics, Jeffrey Goldberg, Barack Obama,
Saudi Arabia, Prince Turki bin al-Faisal Al Saud,
BBC, Frank Gardner, Israel, Hamas, Hezbollah, George Bush,
Britain, France, Iran,
Islamic State / of Iraq and Syria/Sham/the Levant, IS, ISIS, ISIL, Daesh,
Frida Ghitis, Niall Ferguson, Danielle Pletka, Samantha Power

Obama still has most people fooled.
The assumption is that to be President, one must have positive aims, however misguided the politics may be.
Obama has only negative, destructive impulses: he is a man who we should fear, for he can wage nuclear war.
Obama is a nihilist, perhaps the ultimate nihilist. http://www.dictionary.com/browse/nihilist

He is clearly a sociopath who deeply despises America and all that America has stood for.
Obama is not the anti-Bush: Obama thinks that he is the antidote to America.

Another great article John. With insights I would have known nothing about if you hadn't brought them to my attention.

John said:
Obama was going to unify the nation and make the world love America again. He's failed disastrously, because somebody who is so driven by hatred is going to make one stupid decision after another, and allow campaign promises to become irrelevant. This is something that you should think about, Dear Reader, as you decide whom to support for President.

Whom to support for President of the US?? Let's see our choices are (let's see if you can guess who they are):
-A woman who should be elected just because she's a woman even though she has thrown any and all fellow women under the bus if they've had any involvement with her husband - including rape! Oh and by the way she's being investigated by 100+ FBI agents for a variety of things - things that if any normal person had done they would be in prison for now. A GREAT choice.
-Another narcissist - one of the most insulting and inflammatory individuals I've ever seen in politics. Any time any one disagrees with him - he responds with personal attacks. He has no coherent policy - but a great slogan. Oh.. and although most Republicans really aren't racist, he actually is. And people love him because he tells it like it is.
-A loonie but nice old fellow who has never had a real job. Who thinks money grows on trees and the rich ought to just give everything they have to the government. Oh.. and he thinks all our wars are caused by global warming and the solution to our problems is go to deeper into debt. But he does seem to be the most honest and sincere of the candidates - maybe..
-A fellow who really hasn't been in government long enough to do anything productive - but he sure has figured out how to piss all his colleagues off by his insistence of following his own set of rules and looking out for what's best for him. So much so, that behind the scenes several seem to be saying that they would rather have the opponent win. But hey - it's not like the President of the US has to actually get along with anyone and compromise right? I mean President Obama sure hasn't made that a priority.
-Another fellow that hasn't had much of a real job, and doesn't show up to vote for the job he currently has either - because he's too busy trying to get a promotion. He looks pretty, talks nice, spends personal money like there's no tomorrow and likes his perks. I'm pretty sure within 48 hours he's going to hang it up anyway and go do something else (likely on a government paycheck) with his life. Ain't America great?
-A seasoned politician that seems to mostly like the status quo. The status quo that has the citizens so upset they are mostly lining up behind two crazies. He mostly talks nice, has something of a decent record - at least he hasn't totally screwed his state up. Of course he's pretty much in last place.
Yep a great set of choices we have. 3rd party anyone?
Regards,
Jack

Wow John nice article. Will be one to look back on some day when we thought it couldn't get any sillier. I can't say to be any study of ME politics outside of GenDyn articles but I have always thought that Faisal was well regarded at one time and spent quite a bit of time in the US especially in his University days.

I still wonder how much Obama, who I think has some serious issues with Narcissism (perhaps we should look at everything he says via Projectionism and Gaslighting), is in control or if he is just another puppet of Jarrett and Soros et al. We may never know the truth of what happens behind those closed doors any more than we will understand why Faisal stepped down early from his post in 2001.

Still a nice article. You do the work that kids are supposed to do this with all their University "training" are supposedly getting paid to do.

Jack E., your description of the voters choices is very interesting.

"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." John F. Kennedy
http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quote ... 01159.html

After WWI the elite of Europe wanted to punish Germany with reparations. ( Who started the war? treaties drawn up by who?) Things got so bad in Germany that criminal gangs controlled Berlin and some people used their children for prostitution so they could buy food to eat. The people were looking for a savior and they thought they found him. Even people out side of Germany including the US, like Henry Ford, supported him (http://carolynyeager.net/july-30-1938-h ... olf-hitler https://www.google.com/search?q=Henry+F ... uMjhCQM%3A. It turned out bad.

Things aren't that bad in the US yet. But there must be a free flow of ideas and debate and its dissemination, to prevent mistakes like the above. That simply put the reason for free speech and it must not be hindered, for it leads eventually to unpleasantness.

gerald wrote:Jack E., your description of the voters choices is very interesting.

"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." John F. Kennedy
http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quote ... 01159.html

After WWI the elite of Europe wanted to punish Germany with reparations. ( Who started the war? treaties drawn up by who?) Things got so bad in Germany that criminal gangs controlled Berlin and some people used their children for prostitution so they could buy food to eat. The people were looking for a savior and they thought they found him. Even people out side of Germany including the US, like Henry Ford, supported him (http://carolynyeager.net/july-30-1938-h ... olf-hitler https://www.google.com/search?q=Henry+F ... uMjhCQM%3A. It turned out bad.

Things aren't that bad in the US yet. But there must be a free flow of ideas and debate and its dissemination, to prevent mistakes like the above. That simply put the reason for free speech and it must not be hindered, for it leads eventually to unpleasantness.

1919
Keynes predicts economic chaos

At the Palace of Versailles outside Paris, Germany signs the Treaty of Versailles with the Allies, officially ending World War I. The English economist John Maynard Keynes, who had attended the peace conference but then left in protest of the treaty, was one of the most outspoken critics of the punitive agreement. In his The Economic Consequences of the Peace, published in December 1919, Keynes predicted that the stiff war reparations and other harsh terms imposed on Germany by the treaty would lead to the financial collapse of the country, which in turn would have serious economic and political repercussions on Europe and the world. http://www.history.com/this-day-in-hist ... omic-chaos

Yep a great set of choices we have. 3rd party anyone?
Regards,
Jack

So what's new? At least Trump has thrown the cat amongst the pigeons. Whether you agree with it or not he has given the middle class a voice. His negative points are vastly overstated by a media who despise him. Last night on Australian tv we had the MSM run a one hour 'documentary' devoted entirely to character assassination of Trump. That's how widespread their fear and hatred of the man is. The more I see of their progressivist, elitist loathing, the more I support the man.

What racism? He wants a temporary moratorium on Islamic immigration, to protect the USA from terrorism. How is that racism? You're also forgetting that these are just the primaries, not the election. Policies are for general elections, and even then the public is largely uninterested.

As for Europe after the Great War, the big mistake made by the allies was to force democracy onto the German people, when they were much more disposed to having a king as their head of state. Does that mistake sound familiar in regards to recent foreign policy?

Arn't the elits good at f**ing things up. The best and brightest.