Re: Financial topics
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2013 6:52 pm
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-11-0 ... ning-match
We unpacked the black box on credit creation. Brodsky indeed has a decent narrative above on relationship to ngdp as
noted for some who survived those "realities" on the transitory effects called the peso crisis ect and lock ups we are aware of as also the
Smithsonian accord on free float of FX which I rather avoid since policy is intent on zirp which in essense is nirp arm twisting for captial creation
since once you see what the BIS and WTO actually is you can avoid the trip wires of ngdp rhetoric on the funtion of fungible capital maintenence.
If you look into the demise of the natfta "loopholes" on flooding which we also covered here in context to bilateral observations to get a grip on
production flows.
Anyway as before it interferes in actual production in a most dangerous manner since it is impossible to mark and measure moral hazard malinvestments from a premise of credit collapse with out marked to market seeking stabilization. Basil Moore 1983, “Unpacking the post Keynesian black box: bank lending and the money supply”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 1983, Vol. 4 pp. 537-556; here Moore was quoting a Federal Reserve economist from a 1969 conference in which the endogeneity of the money supply was being debated. Consumption of fixed capital.
The concept of print it they will come is ngdp which is the back bone of aca also, but not the limbs. Please remember the maintenance of fixed capital exists for the net working capital and actual free cash flow existing in energy margin cluster. The market made a move and few understand implications we have warned of since that is what it is in this turning.
As he notes "However, even if they succeed in increasing NGDP, they will likely fail in pulling the global economy out of its current disequilibrium."
As with NAFTA the loop holes we noted before and the new agreements are no accident either.
As for the current ACA sector and the election cycle it appears they could actually care less with over 10 million votes gerrymandered as banked as "its free" and no point trying to explain any more the concept no accidents in Politics since FDR and political science. The or else structures will not change since the electorate is actually brain dead and lets be clear I am no R or D. To note is the the lefts ability to control the verbiage on how they screw you in Borgeville and the ability to watch the implants of pressitutes control FUD as the wasting continues. Ask The Swedes how much free cash flow after the statists parasites bleed them pale white and thus rendered servile wards. Key words here are wasting and veil since it coveys the contextual process since lets say 1796.
We unpacked the black box on credit creation. Brodsky indeed has a decent narrative above on relationship to ngdp as
noted for some who survived those "realities" on the transitory effects called the peso crisis ect and lock ups we are aware of as also the
Smithsonian accord on free float of FX which I rather avoid since policy is intent on zirp which in essense is nirp arm twisting for captial creation
since once you see what the BIS and WTO actually is you can avoid the trip wires of ngdp rhetoric on the funtion of fungible capital maintenence.
If you look into the demise of the natfta "loopholes" on flooding which we also covered here in context to bilateral observations to get a grip on
production flows.
Anyway as before it interferes in actual production in a most dangerous manner since it is impossible to mark and measure moral hazard malinvestments from a premise of credit collapse with out marked to market seeking stabilization. Basil Moore 1983, “Unpacking the post Keynesian black box: bank lending and the money supply”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 1983, Vol. 4 pp. 537-556; here Moore was quoting a Federal Reserve economist from a 1969 conference in which the endogeneity of the money supply was being debated. Consumption of fixed capital.
The concept of print it they will come is ngdp which is the back bone of aca also, but not the limbs. Please remember the maintenance of fixed capital exists for the net working capital and actual free cash flow existing in energy margin cluster. The market made a move and few understand implications we have warned of since that is what it is in this turning.
As he notes "However, even if they succeed in increasing NGDP, they will likely fail in pulling the global economy out of its current disequilibrium."
As with NAFTA the loop holes we noted before and the new agreements are no accident either.
As for the current ACA sector and the election cycle it appears they could actually care less with over 10 million votes gerrymandered as banked as "its free" and no point trying to explain any more the concept no accidents in Politics since FDR and political science. The or else structures will not change since the electorate is actually brain dead and lets be clear I am no R or D. To note is the the lefts ability to control the verbiage on how they screw you in Borgeville and the ability to watch the implants of pressitutes control FUD as the wasting continues. Ask The Swedes how much free cash flow after the statists parasites bleed them pale white and thus rendered servile wards. Key words here are wasting and veil since it coveys the contextual process since lets say 1796.