Re: Financial topics
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 7:47 pm
Never wanted the office but said if enough do that is another thing. Cleaned house and services rebid.
Generational theory, international history and current events
https://gdxforum.com/forum/
Enough data has come in to continue this theme from a couple months back.Higgenbotham wrote:I'll post some examples of the inverse of the historical record as time permits. I'm noticing many, many important long term inversions at this time. Some go all the way back to the fall of the Roman Empire but of course those are only good within a few years. I have some decades long cycle inversions coming up soon that appear they may hit to the exact day. An example of one that has (so far) follows.
After the 1929 bubble, the stock market made a Great Depression low on July 8, 1932.
70 years, 3 months and 1 day later, after the 2000 Internet bubble, the stock market made a low on October 9, 2002.
Almost 10 years after the Great Depression low, the stock market made its low for the 1940s decade on June 13, 1942.
After exactly the same amount of time elapsed to the day, that being 70 years, 3 months and 1 day after the 1942 low, the major US indices reached their highest points since the 2009 low on September 14, 2012. On a closing basis, the September 14, 2012 high has not been exceeded since.
My philosophy on that is find one that works and if it works don't argue with it. Cycle dates or otherwise, but it can't be the only factor to observe. Another thing I'm attuned to at this time is sentiment, forum and otherwise. There was a time here when the bears dominated the discussion on this forum and the debate was Dow 1000 or Dow 3000. Those folks have vacated the board. Prices convince by definition. The peak activity in the inflation thread occurred the week silver topped and all the posts moved from here over to there for 7 days. I forgot to note that ISEE reached its 2007 high of 192 on October 29, 2 days ahead of the rebound high. Similarly, ISEE reached 208 on December 17 and so far the following day's high has held. For now, I won't argue with that because sentiment can overule other factors, but combined with a good long term date, I'll keep it until proven otherwise.aedens wrote: We are a more than few dots ahead of some things and i was reminded dates are for eating and estimating how much you do not know.
I agree on the if it works human algo effect but they use us a snacks for there pleasure now or plain kill switches for some to enamored in there network. Those ventures are already progessing under documents we have provided given ante view connections. The study captured in the forums provided is 1378 clusters of innovated supply chain in context to contractual and property rights. Under that guise there shock analysis from the Fed rings true on that bell alone and the mechanism for dislocation. We did mentioned orphan structures from funds that under scrutiny the statists are obligated for public dissemination. I now resemble that comment second quarter H. We are talking four deep interlineated contructs and the appearance of fractal events are not correlation but infered causation to events in definition.Higgenbotham wrote:My philosophy on that is find one that works and if it works don't argue with it. Cycle dates or otherwise, but it can't be the only factor to observe. Another thing I'm attuned to at this time is sentiment, forum and otherwise. There was a time here when the bears dominated the discussion on this forum and the debate was Dow 1000 or Dow 3000. Those folks have vacated the board. Prices convince by definition. The peak activity in the inflation thread occurred the week silver topped and all the posts moved from here over to there for 7 days. I forgot to note that ISEE reached its 2007 high of 192 on October 29, 2 days ahead of the rebound high. Similarly, ISEE reached 208 on December 17 and so far the following day's high has held. For now, I won't argue with that because sentiment can overule other factors, but combined with a good long term date, I'll keep it until proven otherwise.aedens wrote: We are a more than few dots ahead of some things and i was reminded dates are for eating and estimating how much you do not know.
I typically see the market get driven down 1-3 days after the bullishness gets lopsided, where ISEE is a measure, if the market is moving into a bear trend. If not, the sentiment can stay lopsided for some time as prices move higher. That can also be seen at the September 14 ISEE peak, which is near the December 17 peak, and both are the highest points in the past year, similar to the October 8 and 29 points in 2007. Another interesting thing to note is the time delay comparison of 2-3 days in 2007 for sentiment to evaporate versus 0-1 days in 2012, along with the higher ISEE numbers in 2012 versus 2007. This may differentiate to the beginning of a wave 1 versus the beginning of a wave 3 in Elliott definitions. Near as I can tell, the fractal events show that the inevitable can be altered to within a 3 year time window by human action and that is all the wiggle room that nature makes available. If the collapse of the Bardi came early in that timeline, it would be my guess that the latest a banking collapse can be held off is 2014.aedens wrote:I agree on the if it works human algo effect but they use us a snacks for there pleasure now or plain kill switches for some to enamored in there network. Those ventures are already progessing under documents we have provided given ante view connections. The study captured in the forums provided is 1378 clusters of innovated supply chain in context to contractual and property rights. Under that guise there shock analysis from the Fed rings true on that bell alone and the mechanism for dislocation. We did mentioned orphan structures from funds that under scrutiny the statists are obligated for public dissemination. I now resemble that comment second quarter H. We are talking four deep interlineated contructs and the appearance of fractal events are not correlation but infered causation to events in definition.