https://www.redandblack.com/uganews/uga ... 5e6f1.html
Biden legacy
Sealed
Thrown to the wolves by Joe Biden’s reckless criminal border policies.
Alinsky Luciferin
Rodham, “There is Only the Fight,” May 2, 1969
Kodak agreed to work with FIGHT but made it very clear that ‘[W]e’re not in the welfare business — that’s the government’s job.’”
(FIGHT was an acronym for a Rochester group: Freedom, Independence, God, Honor, Today.)
Exposure began for Alinsky when he and other students collected food for the starving coal miners in southern Illinois
who were rebelling against John L. Lewis and the United Mine Workers.
Lewis became a role model for Alinsky who learned about labor's organizational tactics from watching and working with Lewis during the early
years of the CIO.
Alinsky's first book, Reveille for Radicals, was published. Since Alinsky
is firstly an activist and secondly a theoretician, more than one-half
the book is concerned with the tactics of building "People's Organizations."
https://blogs.chicagotribune.com/files/ ... is-ocr.pdf
Alinsky claims a position of moral relativism, but his moral context
is stabilized by a belief in the eventual manifestation of the goodness of
man. He believes that if men were allowed to live free from fear and want they
would live in peace. He also believes that only men with a sense of their own
worth and a respect for the commonality of humanity will be able to create
this new world.
Neo-Hobbesian who objects to the consensual mystique.
Schelling's dilemma.
Nash equilibrium.
Effectiveness overall performance.
Data fragility.
No clue what sweeps produced to what they even consider validity to denigrate.
Deceive, Deny, Discourage, Divide, Dissent, Dominate, Decapitate and Destroy.
Final Exam from a Professor.
Why.
Because.
Anything else was failed.
Progressivism and relativism serve as the means of achieving the goal of a citizenry with a statist orientation.
I myself had all sorts of fun in college with moral nihilism being distinct from moral relativism, which does allow a moral statements to be true or false in a non-objective sense, but does not assign any static truth to values of a moral statements, and of course moral universalism, which holds moral statements to be objectively true or false. Insofar as only true statements can be known, moral nihilism implies moral skepticism.
thread: amos, xrip, adea
https://twitter.com/i/flow/single_sign_on
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79gy57NOYaw