Generational Dynamics Forum - New Site

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/201 ... aq-chilcot

Actually we should seal the border for seven years. Easter island B deserves its spot of tea time for dislocation politics.
It actually shows how disconnected they deserve to be.

Trump pissed on their biscuits and jam just as forty four danced around the topic. The point is the taxpayers have been
insulted and slapped around enough.

As we see Comey got a free pass so there we are since omission is commission.

Surprised? Nope. The seal is set from above.

The Senate report also makes clear that: 'The United States provided the government of Iraq with 'dual use' licensed materials which assisted in the development of Iraqi chemical, biological and missile-system programmes.'
This assistance, according to the report, included 'chemical warfare-agent precursors, chemical warfare-agent production facility plans and technical drawings, chemical warfare filling equipment, biological warfare-related materials, missile fabrication equipment and missile system guidance equipment'.

Donald Riegle, then chairman of the committee, said: 'UN inspectors had identified many United States manufactured items that had been exported from the United States to Iraq under licences issued by the Department of Commerce.

Also, Khamenei singled out France and Germany as the suppliers of chemical weapons for Saddam.
He said the German and French people should know what their governments did.

We cannot even try to understand why the arm pit of the planet has more than two locations.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-08- ... -time-ever

You have to "pay" someone to take your money.
Let that sink in.

No way can you blame this taxpayer or for that matter the half of us not playing socialist roulette with these pagan half wits.

The situation that is unfolding in Venezuela has some resemblance to the Cuba crisis of 1962. At that time, Cuba was acting on behalf of the USSR; now Venezuela is acting on behalf of Iran. At present, the geopolitical situation is very different: the world is no longer ruled by two superpowers; new nations, often with questionable leaders and the ambition of acquiring global status, are appearing on the international scene. December 8, 2010

So the failed states and border issues to weaponries of illegals at the border payed its wages.

The arc of instability locally was a broken glass in isle five and the fruit baskets is what you got for a present.
Our soils rests and we ready for harvest to bake our bread. Water is a core focus hows yours.

Amos 8: words translated "summer fruit" and "end." Amos answers God's question by saying he saw ripe fruit.
But, when God responds, He uses a similar sounding word to suggest the time was ripe for His people.
The fruit represents people.

If ripe, they were ready either to be used or to rot.

The Harvest is ripe but the workers few He warned us also.

The four soils as we renew.

thread: 2024 https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-08- ... si-gabbard
If she wasn't getting financial support from the right, she'd be out of the race already.
She's still wacked out on immigration and climate hoax.
http://gdxforum.com/forum/search.php?ke ... sf=msgonly
http://gdxforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php ... 024#p24744 this is the point of sogo and fair action in trades.
Three elements determine a fair wage: The worker's family responsibilities, the economic condition of the enterprise and the economy as a whole. The family has an innate right to development, but this is only possible within the framework of a functioning economy and sound enterprises.

Unlike Leo XIII, who addressed the condition of workers, Pius XI discusses the ethical implications of the social and economic order.

If they are not interested in fair trade and terms it is clear what is served of any order.

As we know under heaven the politics of envy.
The watchers have done their duty and the two witnesses will come.

The new normal started December 2018. Will focus DCF as we already knew and Z scores. Thu Aug 01, 2019 9:15 pm
https://www.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inli ... k=Fnl3BDvL

7

Oxford University in England did a study, recently, to try to determine how political philosophies affect liberals, conservatives, and non-committed.
Each person was given sheets with a varying number of dots on each page. The subjects were asked to count the dots and write down the number they counted. The average number of incorrect answers was about the same for everyone. The researchers had no interest in the correct answers, just the incorrect ones.
When a conservative or non-committed person was told about their wrong answers, they had no problem accepting the fact.
When the liberal was told about their wrong answers, they refused to believe they got the answers wrong, even when shown the answers.
Now, please tell me how any liberal will believe the Democrats are wrong with tax and spend, and free programs for everyone but you.

Ayers and his group planned to deal with Americans who would try to resist this takeover by “establishing re-education centers in the south-west”. Asked what he would do with those who still refused to convert to communism, Ayers said that they would have to be “eliminated,” as in 25 million Americans would be killed in concentration camps. Grathwohl said the Weathermen told him the camps would be used to “re-educate people into the new way of thinking.

If you think for one seconds this could never happen here you are disarmed and clinally insane.

fyi: https://www.wnd.com/2012/03/postman-aye ... gh-school/
https://ladyliberty1885.com/2018/12/28/ ... ntil-blue/

https://www.federaltimes.com/newsletter ... s-in-2018/
yes we seen this trend before

It’s the area where Trump is the weakest. He’s not weak on women’s rights, racism, gay rights or any of the rest of the idiotic identity politics of the rest of the Democratic field.

He’s weakest on the one issue that got him elected in the first place, foreign policy. Hillary was the candidate of Empire. Trump was not. It’s why we saw an international conspiracy formed to destroy him and his presidency. Now that same apparatus is mobilized against Tulsi Gabbard. tyler

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRt4hQs3nH0
Will start aug19 since the sun will rise, and equity will sort it out.

Good call H.

As for this week rule 13,16,and 21 came into play this week.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqUa_G1h3pw

** 02-Aug-2019 Oxford study

aeden wrote: > Oxford University in England did a study, recently, to try to
> determine how political philosophies affect liberals,
> conservatives, and non-committed. Each person was given sheets
> with a varying number of dots on each page. The subjects were
> asked to count the dots and write down the number they counted.
> The average number of incorrect answers was about the same for
> everyone. The researchers had no interest in the correct answers,
> just the incorrect ones. When a conservative or non-committed
> person was told about their wrong answers, they had no problem
> accepting the fact. When the liberal was told about their wrong
> answers, they refused to believe they got the answers wrong, even
> when shown the answers.

Do you have a link for this claim?

The single largest collapse in stock market wealth in history becomes the logical base case scenario.

It should be noted that this is not some "gloom and doom" scenario - and there are lots of those out there. If there is a global trade war, or a "hot war" in the Middle East or Asia, or if the next attempted containment of crisis by the Fed were to fail, or if the dollar were to collapse, or if we were to have a new great depression - any of those could produce losses in stock market wealth that could far exceed what is illustrated above.

All that is shown above is the extrapolation of averages, with the implicit assumption that everything else holds. The Fed's next containment of crisis does work, we don't return to long term averages for stock valuations, and another cycle of expansion follows the next cycle of recession. This could be called the optimistic version of the future, compared to some of the alternatives. But yet, nonetheless - the price of having what is the most elevated stock market in history coming into the historical normality of a cycle of recession would produce the greatest loss of stock market wealth ever experienced in the United States.

It's just simple multiplication and averages.

Taking the simplifying step of using a 36% loss that is derived from the actual history of the S&P 500, and applying it to all stocks, we multiply times $33 trillion and come up with a loss in stock market wealth of $12 trillion.

The stockholders of America, including individuals, institutions and pension funds, would take a $12 trillion hit. This would exceed the previous record losses seen in 2000-2002 and in 2007-2009 by around $4 trillion, in inflation-adjusted terms.

Another way of looking at this is that the inflation-adjusted value of the S&P 500 did not pass 1,000 until the year 1996 (using 2018 dollars). So, a 36% decline from the current extreme elevations would produce a loss in wealth that is larger than the total capitalization of the U.S. stock markets in any year prior to 1996.

https://www.gold-eagle.com/article/next ... es-history

Official source that helps to verify the above:

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DDDM01USA156NWDB#0

This is only updated through 2017. It verifies that in 2017 the total stock market cap divided by GDP was higher than it was at the top of the 2000 bubble.

Then here's an approximate idea of how much it's grown since 2017:

https://ycharts.com/indicators/us_total ... talization