Re: Financial topics
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2016 4:36 pm
Thanks for the reminder to re-read that discussion.Megaphone formation H conveyed some time back as feedback, or to say flutter.
Generational theory, international history and current events
https://gdxforum.com/forum/
Thanks for the reminder to re-read that discussion.Megaphone formation H conveyed some time back as feedback, or to say flutter.
Higgenbotham wrote:I can't remember the exact quote, but in the 1930's the US Central Bank was quoted as saying to the effect that, "We did all we could to stop the deflation." Now I need to add to that, "We did all we could to stop the deflation within the moral precepts that confined activity at that time." The harpooning process and press conferences that put the Tass News Agency to shame have nothing to do with "the moral precepts that confined activity at that time." The current process is a Dark Age process. It is strictly mechanical and physical from the standpoint of where we are going. All post year 1500 models are broken and there are not enough records pre year 1500 to contruct a model. What that means in my view is the system will be run hot to its physical limit, as described by the flutter effect and the stimulation effect to the dying patient, the theory being that the structure has already collapsed and the patient is already terminal. The idea is to blast the structure with enough high pressure air to keep it standing before the vibrations collapse it, or to give the patient enough stimulation to keep the organs functioning and the patient moving. There will be no stock market crash that is regenerative or cleansing, in that the cleansing process of the crash takes the economy to new heights as has been the case for 5 centuries of Western civilization. Instead, the economy will be run hot to its dying breath (note the irony of my statement), then it will completely collapse.
True to some extent. I would say that the dark age that is sweeping across America has rendered wide swaths of territory inhospitable while benefiting narrow sections of territory due to refugees leaving the inhospitable areas. There may be 3 or 4 states that have significantly grown jobs and wealth since 2008 (around pre-2008 rates for the US as a whole).John wrote:It's not clear to me why millionaires fleeing Chicago for Seattle
means anything by itself. After all, Chicago's loss is Seattle's
gain.
A good example is what happened in Flint. Enough wealth and expertise was sucked out of that area to allow recent events to happen, rendering the city a wasteland. The water distribution system will never be rebuilt and the city will be abandoned. That's not a problem necessarily until the same type of thing happens in a city/cities that is/are critical to the functioning of the civilization as a whole, like Chicago.Higgenbotham wrote:The millionaires leaving the second tier cities are taking their wealth and expertise that sustains the functionality of that geographic area, accelerating the collapse of that area.