Generational Dynamics Forum - New Site

So here we are at the crossroads since On April 25, 1986, the nuclear power plant at Chernobyl (in the Ukraine 90 kilometers north of Kiev) exploded. The radiation killed hundreds of women and children, contaminated rivers and streams and ruined local agriculture. In the Soviet Union, public mistrust of nuclear plants dashed hopes of nuclear energy as an inexpensive source of power, and plans were laid instead for building new natural gas pipelines.

As we noted Turkey will host run the natural gas with you know who. Funny indeed how the north magnetic lines of force alighned with that...
speculation....due north is ez38:15

Keynes and Hayek only differed in the timing to preserve or eliminate "legal" cartel players and the definition of moral hazzard.

Millions vote with no water or electical power to "poll with a mouse click". Black or white it matters not what catches the mice it was said...

Velvit rope

http://gdxforum.com/forum/search.php?ke ... sf=msgonly

I was reviewing the top ten list when they fell and what happened to them when they awoke.
Carnage today is the simple sad result.
http://gdxforum.com/forum/search.php?ke ... sf=msgonly

Yuri Bezmenov checklist.
1. Infiltration
2. Re-education
3. Demoralization
4. Destabilization http://ivarfjeld.com/2015/07/05/sodomis ... hristians/
5. Create and Use Crisis
6. Normalization of Communist System

Believers are called on to "awake" out of sleep; unbelievers, to "arise" from the dead eph5:14

Re3:10 Because thou hast kept the word of my patience, I also will keep thee from the hour of temptation,
which shall come upon all the world, to try them that dwell upon the earth.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Lord Macaulay’s address to the British Parliament in 2 February, 1835:

"I have traveled across the length and breadth of India and I have not seen one person who is a beggar, who is a thief. Such wealth I have seen in this country, such high moral values, people of such calibre, that I do not think we would ever conquer this country, unless we break the very backbone of this nation, which is her spiritual and cultural heritage, and, therefore, I propose that we replace her old and ancient education system, her culture, for if the Indians think that all that is foreign and English is good and greater than their own, they will lose their self-esteem, their native self-culture and they will become what we want them, a truly dominated nation."

Henry Kissinger,the time of the turkish invasion in Cyprus, while addressing a group of Washington, D.C. businessmen in Sept.1974:

"The Greek people are anarchic and difficult to tame. For this reason we must strike deep into their cultural roots: Perhaps then we can
force them to conform. I mean, of course, to strike at their language, their religion, their cultural and historical reserves, so that we can
neutralize their ability to develop, to distinguish themselves, or to prevail. Thereby removing them as an obstacle to our strategically
vital plans in the Balkans, the Mediterranean, and the Middle East, to all this neuralgic territory of great strategic importance for us, for
the politics of the USA."

http://gdxforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php ... ion#p24047

Basic Definitions

Civilization - a structure based on lies which exists for the benefit of the few and the detriment of the many
Revolution - the dissolution of the structure based on lies that happens when the many collectively figure out they've been screwed by the lies of the few

Example:
Lie: "Ben Bernanke saved the world" Sources: News media, Warren Buffett, etc.
Truth: Ben Bernanke has never produced anything in his entire life except for false theories and counterfeit money. His actions were encouraged by a structure based on lies whereby the false theories and counterfeit money were solely for the benefit of the few and the detriment of the many.

Higgenbotham wrote:Basic Definitions

Civilization - a structure based on lies which exists for the benefit of the few and the detriment of the many
Revolution - the dissolution of the structure based on lies that happens when the many collectively figure out they've been screwed by the lies of the few

Example:
Lie: "Ben Bernanke saved the world" Sources: News media, Warren Buffett, etc.
Truth: Ben Bernanke has never produced anything in his entire life except for false theories and counterfeit money. His actions were encouraged by a structure based on lies whereby the false theories and counterfeit money were solely for the benefit of the few and the detriment of the many.

Bingo!!!

And what is the difference between the ancient priests of the temples and now? same old same old, just a variation on a theme.

And yet, anarchy would be even worse.

This is kind of interesting. First on CBS News it can be seen that a Mexican illegal randomly shot and killed a White female in San Francisco:
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/feds-san-fr ... d-5-times/

Next we read about what a horrible person Donald Trump is for saying Mexican illegals bring crime to the US:
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/donald-trum ... is-severe/

John wrote:And yet, anarchy would be even worse.

The anarchy that will eventually come will be worse than the anarchy that would have come.

How much worse is debatable but I doubt the few years he bought will be worth it. A lot of destruction has occurred in those few years.

Esau sold his birthright for a bowl food. Later Edom ws destoyed. His spiritual blessings and responsibilities meant nothing to him.
We can go full circle with any logic man has for mere entertainment already. The script has choices as we all know.

John wrote: > And yet, anarchy would be even worse.

Higgenbotham wrote: > The anarchy that will eventually come will be worse than the
> anarchy that would have come.

After all these years in writing about generational theory, I've
reached the following conclusions:

Every country goes through a cycle around 80 years long, the length of
a human lifetime, because a new crisis arises when the survivors of
the previous crisis die off, losing the accumulated wisdom and lessons
learned.

So, out of that 80 years, there will be 10-20 years of anarchy,
bloodshed, slaughter, disaster. The other 60-70 years have the
potential to be fairly "nice," with only brief spurts of violence.

So my contribution to the theory of governance is that countries
should focus their policies on making the non-crisis period as "nice"
as possible, knowing that the can't do anything about the crisis
period anyway.

Man of La Mancha wrote: > "'Life as it is.' I have lived for over forty years
> and I've seen 'life as it is'. Pain. Misery.
> Cruelty beyond belief. I've heard all the voices of
> God's noblest creature -- moans from bundles of filth
> in the street. I've been a soldier and a slave. I've
> seen my comrades fall in battle or die more slowly
> under the lash in Africa. I've held them at the last
> moment. These were men who saw 'life as it is,' but
> they died despairing.

> No glory. No bray of last words. Only their eyes,
> filled with confusion, questioning, 'Why?'

> I do not think they were asking why they were dying,
> but why they had ever lived.

> When life itself seems lunatic, who knows where
> madness lies? Perhaps to be too practical is madness.
> To surrender dreams, this may be madness. To seek
> treasure where there is only trash. Too much sanity
> may be madness. But maddest of all -- to see life as
> it is, and not as it should be!"

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles ... f_law.html
http://gdxforum.com/forum/search.php?ke ... sf=msgonly
Taxpayers are scary enough.
When they said they are our children he said more than He should have.
I understand the state education comment is far from a concise fact of
what we seen when we had known to be on its way.
They more than appear to creating enclaves carving up zones and nothing will stop it now.
They need it appear relavent.

John wrote:

John wrote: > And yet, anarchy would be even worse.

Higgenbotham wrote: > The anarchy that will eventually come will be worse than the
> anarchy that would have come.

So my contribution to the theory of governance is that countries
should focus their policies on making the non-crisis period as "nice"
as possible, knowing that the can't do anything about the crisis
period anyway.

That seems to conflict with your regression and undershoot of the mean theory. That says the longer and further the stock market drfits from the underlying mean growth the further it will eventually fall when the music stops. Applying that theory overall would say that extending and pretending more during the nice period results in greater anarchy during the crisis period. My guess is that the relationship is not linear, but exponential.