Re: Financial topics
Posted: Fri May 23, 2014 7:06 am
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-05-2 ... ell-ordersaedens wrote:The capping in the metals is obvious.
There is no economic news or theory otherwise that is needed to explain it. j
Generational theory, international history and current events
https://gdxforum.com/forum/
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-05-2 ... ell-ordersaedens wrote:The capping in the metals is obvious.
There is no economic news or theory otherwise that is needed to explain it. j
http://www.michaelsincere.com/Last week, I wrote a controversial column for MarketWatch (http://on.mktw.net/1kg4b5p). In the column, I wrote there are signs a bear market is approaching, although no one can say when. I also don't know the catalyst that will cause the current bull market to end, but I'm looking for clues. More than likely, I wrote, it will be a geopolitical crisis, an economic disruption, or a spike in interest rates.
After the column was published, I received an onslaught of negative comments and tons of emails. A few fund managers wrote to thank me for confirming what they believe, but the majority of investors attacked me for being "stupid," "wrong," and "insincere."
In 2004, Gasiorowski edited a book on the coup arguing that "the climate of intense cold war rivalry between the superpowers, together with Iran's strategic vital location between the Soviet Union and the Persian Gulf oil fields, led U.S. officials to believe that they had to take whatever steps were necessary to prevent Iran from falling into Soviet hands." While "these concerns seem vastly overblown today"the pattern of "the 1945–46 Azerbaijan crisis, the consolidation of Soviet control in Eastern Europe, the communist triumph in China, and the Korean War—and with the Red Scare at its height in the United States" would not allow U.S. officials to risk allowing the "Eisenhowers prudent view" Tudeh Party to gain power in Iran. Furthermore, "U.S. officials believed that resolving the oil dispute was essential for restoring stability in Iran, and after March 1953 it appeared that the dispute could be resolved only at the expense either of Britain or of Mosaddeq." He concludes "it was geostrategic considerations, rather than a desire to destroy Mosaddeq's movement, to establish a dictatorship in Iran or to gain control over Iran's oil, that persuaded U.S. officials to undertake the coup."Higgenbotham wrote:http://www.michaelsincere.com/Last week, I wrote a controversial column for MarketWatch (http://on.mktw.net/1kg4b5p). In the column, I wrote there are signs a bear market is approaching, although no one can say when. I also don't know the catalyst that will cause the current bull market to end, but I'm looking for clues. More than likely, I wrote, it will be a geopolitical crisis, an economic disruption, or a spike in interest rates.
After the column was published, I received an onslaught of negative comments and tons of emails. A few fund managers wrote to thank me for confirming what they believe, but the majority of investors attacked me for being "stupid," "wrong," and "insincere."