Religion and Vaccine Arguments

[tim]

https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/ ... den-deaths

See how many CLUSTERS of “sudden deaths” we’ve noted just this year. How many will it take to get the press to start reporting it, and everybody else to notice it?

140+ articles make all too clear that the whole world is going through an unacknowleged Holocaust

[tim]

Ed Dowd has said that the excess deaths are continuing and at the rate it is holding it is a national security risk.

[tim]

https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the- ... d-the-mrna

The Fraud That Launched the mRNA Era

A forensic audit of Pfizer's trial data, newly released Argentine regulatory documents, and what they reveal about the "safe and effective" claim the entire mRNA platform rests upon

A MIDWESTERN DOCTOR
OCT 11, 2026

Story at a Glance:

Before COVID, mRNA had failed for decades and both companies developing it were in financial trouble. However, an emergency framework built years in advance made it possible to rush their vaccines to market. Now there is a major push to replace much of the vaccine schedule with lucrative mRNA vaccines, despite the platform being immensely problematic and still poorly understood.
The mRNA platform’s acceptance rests on the claim that its trials proved it “safe and effective,” yet the same tactics routinely used to rig clinical trials were used throughout them, from the misleading “95% effective” figure to injured participants having their injuries recoded as unrelated conditions.

Using trial data released by court order, a team of independent researchers and whistleblowers spent years auditing Pfizer’s trial. Within the limited records procured, extensive irregularities were documented throughout the trials including 1,203 participants vanishing from the records, 1,209 adverse events re-filed as COVID symptoms, undisclosed deaths in the vaccine group, unequal COVID testing between the groups, and the public receiving a more dangerous formulation of the vaccine which was never tested prior to being released.

Newly released documents from Argentina’s FDA show the trial’s largest site had twenty violations, including 52 participants given nearly double the planned dose, which finally resolves one of the trial’s longstanding mysteries.
Fortunately, the tide has turned. Federal health officials are now acknowledging vaccine injuries, investigators have gained the power to obtain the evidence long kept hidden, and public opinion has shifted to the point that it is finally possible to openly discuss what was done.

[tim]

https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/emergi ... -childhood

Emerging Datasets Linking Childhood Vaccination to Autism

Dr McCullough sits down with Steve Kirsch to review the findings

Kirsch’s central argument is temporal asymmetry as the fingerprint of causation:

If vaccines were irrelevant, autism onset should be evenly scattered across the calendar relative to shots.
Instead, onset clusters in the days after vaccination and almost never in the days before.

Coupled with a dose-response relationship (more shots → higher odds), he asserts every Bradford Hill criterion is met.
McCullough frames it with the encephalitis model: vaccine → fever → subclinical brain inflammation (encephalitis) → autistic child (post-encephalitic). That’s the mechanistic story the datasets are meant to support. This is consistent with the McCullough Foundation Report: The Determinants of Autism Spectrum Disorder.

[tim]

https://pierrekorymedicalmusings.com/p/ ... career-but

Ōmura’s laboratory discovered the soil organism that gave the world avermectin, and from it, ivermectin. My COVID work had intersected with his, if not nearly duplicated it. Like me, he did not stay quiet during COVID. From the very beginning of the pandemic, he reached out to Merck, imploring them to fund trials. Like me, he and his colleagues published a major, highly positive review of the dozens of ivermectin studies available at the time. He also wrote a book about ivermectin’s role in COVID, though its title, Ivermectin: Can It Become a Lifesaving Treatment for COVID-19?, was more optimistic than mine, The War on Ivermectin.

The world’s press, which had been perfectly happy to celebrate him in 2015, decided it didn’t want to hear from him in 2021. Only when I met him did I learn how complete that silence had been, even at home. His book became a bestseller in Japan, yet the Japanese media barely covered it, and no one invited him to give a single interview. No major publisher would take it. A Nobel laureate in his own country, writing about the drug that won him the prize, couldn't find a mainstream publisher.

I had seen a glimpse of that silencing from the other side of the world, years before we ever met. Because of my highly public advocacy for ivermectin and my role in the FLCCC, I slowly became fairly visible on Twitter, reaching over 600,000 followers. My single most popular tweet to date was me reporting that YouTube had taken down an interview with Ōmura about using ivermectin. Check out the retweet count, for a man not named Elon Musk:

That tweet was paired, in an old post, with a video clip I want to reshare: a fiery diatribe by Professor Masanori Fukushima, Professor Emeritus of Kyoto University, delivering a scathing and scientifically accurate critique of pretty much every aspect of the COVID vaccine campaign. The world had only a handful of truly prominent academics bold enough to publicly criticize their country’s COVID response, and no one came close to Fukushima’s fury (it’s even angrier than my ivermectin Senate testimony). When I watch it, I feel like I did as a kid watching the training montage in Rocky, with the theme music cranked up. Best line: “a bunch of incompetent scholars who cannot be called scholars... a total disregard for science and medicine.” Amen.

[tim]

https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/vaccin ... endangered

Vaccine Cartel Begins Injecting Endangered Baby Elephants With Experimental mRNA Shots

Zoos across America have begun subjecting their elephants to elephant herpesvirus (EEHV) gene therapy procedures.

The experimental mRNA injection rollout has now reached endangered baby elephants. On October 8, 2026, the Saint Louis Zoo announced that a 1½-year-old Asian elephant named Jet had received his third dose of an experimental mRNA injection targeting elephant endotheliotropic herpesvirus (EEHV).

Developed by Baylor College of Medicine in collaboration with zoo researchers, the gene therapy uses lipid nanoparticles to deliver four synthetic mRNA sequences encoding EEHV viral proteins.

Experimental mRNA Gene Therapy Is Expanding Across American Zoos

The research program involves institutions including Houston Zoo, Cincinnati Zoo, Fort Worth Zoo, Rosamond Gifford Zoo, and White Oak Conservation. Saint Louis Zoo has now publicly confirmed vaccinating its young elephant.

A peer-reviewed study published in the Journal of Virology in July 2026 evaluated the gene therapy in nine Asian elephants. Elephants received up to FOUR injections containing 400 micrograms of mRNA each. Three of six initially antibody-negative elephants failed to develop detectable antibody responses after their first two injections and required additional booster shots.

Vaccinated Elephants Still Contracted EEHV

Perhaps most notably, a second peer-reviewed study published in the Journal of Virology documented that two juvenile elephants at Cincinnati Zoo developed confirmed EEHV infections after receiving two doses of the experimental mRNA injection.

Both animals received their injections in October and November 2024 before testing positive in February and March 2025. The findings show that the mRNA gene therapy does not reliably prevent EEHV infection in elephants.

The expansion of dangerous mRNA technology into endangered wildlife already facing the threat of extinction marks a disturbing new frontier in veterinary medicine.

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Epidemiologist and Foundation Administrator, McCullough Foundation

Support our mission: mcculloughfnd.org

Please consider following both the McCullough Foundation and my personal account on X (formerly Twitter) for further content.

[tim]

https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/the-an ... ection-who

The Annual Influenza Injection: Who Really Profits When 40% of America Lines Up

Volumes falling, prices rising, and the cheapest products mysteriously disappearing. Coincidence?

The Influenza Vaccine Business: Brands, Prices, and the Money Behind the Needle

Roughly 40% of Americans rolling up a sleeve means somewhere in the neighborhood of 130–135 million doses moving through the U.S. market in a season. That’s not a public health program with a marketing budget. That’s a product line, and a lucrative one.

Vaccine Oligopoly

The U.S. flu market is essentially a four-player oligopoly:

Sanofi — Fluzone, Fluzone High-Dose (for 65+), and the multi-dose vials that anchor institutional purchasing
CSL Seqirus — Flucelvax (cell-based) and the legacy egg-based Afluria, which the company is now sunsetting
GSK — Fluarix and FluLaval
AstraZeneca — FluMist, the nasal spray, and the only real non-injection option at scale
That’s it. Four companies. No meaningful independent competition, no transparent price discovery, and a purchasing structure where a handful of distributors and government contracts set the terms for everyone.

What It Costs

Prices vary wildly depending on channel — private list price, distributor contract, government bulk purchase — which is exactly how you keep the real numbers murky.

Egg-based standard trivalent/quadrivalent: roughly $20–$21 per dose at list
Flucelvax (cell-based): $43.54 per dose list price for 2026/27 — a deliberate premium positioning
Fluzone High-Dose: sits above standard pricing, marketed on the “stronger immune response” angle for the 65+ cohort
FluMist: priced in the standard range but with the convenience premium baked in
Note the pattern: the industry has been retiring cheap egg-based products and pushing cell-based and adjuvanted alternatives at double the price. CSL is literally discontinuing Afluria while expanding Flucelvax. That’s not a scientific necessity. Is that medical progress or margin engineering?

The Revenue Picture

Here’s where it gets interesting.

U.S. market value: roughly $2.98 billion for the 2025 season, projected toward $5.45 billion by 2030 on base-case modeling
Global market: around $9 billion in 2025, forecast to $12–13 billion by 2030–2032
Sanofi’s U.S. flu revenue alone: approximately $1.54 billion in the 2025/26 season
CSL Seqirus: over $1 billion in U.S. revenue
So of that ~$3 billion U.S. pie, two companies take the overwhelming majority. The “40% uptake” figure isn’t a public health target — it’s a revenue floor that manufacturers lobby, market, and contract to protect.

What the Numbers Don’t Tell You

A few things worth sitting with:

Volume fell, value rose. Distributed doses dropped from ~145 million to ~132 million — yet aggregate revenue held or grew. That’s pricing power, not demand.
The mRNA push is next. GSK is advancing a dual-antigen mRNA flu candidate into Phase 3. Moderna already has one marketed. The next price tier is being built right now.
Liability architecture. The U.S. government’s vaccine injury compensation system means manufacturers carry minimal product liability exposure. The risk is socialized; the revenue is privatized. That asymmetry is the core of the business model.
Forecast accuracy is a feature, not a bug. Strains are selected months ahead based on surveillance data, and effectiveness varies season to season — but the revenue doesn’t vary with effectiveness. That’s the tell.
Bottom Line

The influenza vaccine market is a $3 billion U.S. business and a $9–13 billion global one, controlled by four companies, increasingly priced upward through product substitution, and underwritten by government purchasing and liability protection. The “40% uptake” expectation isn’t just epidemiology — it’s a sales target dressed as a public health campaign, and the companies behind it have every incentive to keep the number climbing.

[tim]

https://blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/break ... _id=746368

BREAKING: Misconduct at Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine trial site in Argentina

Previously undisclosed documents expose dosing errors, disputed safety records and ethics violations at one of Pfizer’s largest Covid-19 vaccine trial sites.

Dosing errors and protocol chaos

Trouble surfaced on 11 August 2020, when a volunteer assigned to receive a placebo was mistakenly injected with Pfizer’s experimental vaccine.

The research team discovered the error and contacted Pfizer to correct the participant’s treatment assignment in IMPALA, which is the automated medication allocation system.

But when he returned for his second injection on 3 September, the system again assigned placebo. He was not informed of the mistake until 23 September, more than six weeks after receiving the incorrect injection.

By then, a much larger medication error had already unfolded.

On 23 August, pharmacy staff incorrectly diluted the experimental vaccine, resulting in 52 volunteers receiving approximately 58 micrograms of mRNA instead of the prescribed 30 micrograms — almost double the intended dose.

In a letter to Polack dated 31 August, Pfizer blamed human error, saying the pharmacist or unblinded administrator “did not read the label correctly” before administering improperly diluted vaccine.

The mistake was discovered during routine medication checks by a Pfizer pharmacist, prompting a temporary recruitment hold.

Pfizer’s 31 August 2020 letter documenting the dosing error (original English document).

But recruitment resumed the very next day after staff retraining, even as Pfizer continued investigating the incident and considering further corrective measures.

Pfizer said it contacted all 52 volunteers who received the higher dose that same day and found no increase in reported adverse events, although it was too early to rule out complications that might have emerged later.

Pfizer also recommended unblinding affected volunteers so they could decide whether to continue receiving the vaccine.

Argentina’s National Administration of Drugs, Foods, and Medical Devices (ANMAT) was not satisfied.

After questioning Pfizer and the research team about inadequate training and vaccine preparation procedures, the drug regulator ordered them to suspend recruitment again on 9 September until further notice, demanding an informed-consent addendum explaining the risks and benefits of receiving another dose.

When inspectors examined the trial more closely, they uncovered problems extending well beyond medication errors.

[tim]

https://read.sayerji.com/p/why-every-na ... medium=web

A 2010 plan to watch mothers who asked questions about vaccines. A 2012 forward to Jeffrey Epstein asking for his idea about those mothers. A label that followed me for a decade. All of it is in the record now.

Picture a mother at a kitchen table in 2010. Her son has a fever after his shots, and she types a question into a search box: Is this normal?

That same year, in a report commissioned by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, consultants proposed a system to catch her question. They called it a “vaccine rumor surveillance system.” It appears on page 17. On the same page, the same report concedes “real and suspected adverse events following immunization.”




Real. Their word. The question the mother asked was legitimate, and they knew it. The system was for her anyway.

I know this because the report is in the Epstein files.

She was not the first

The mother at that table in 2010 had a long line of women behind her.

In the 1950s and 60s, the leading theory of autism blamed the mother. “Refrigerator mothers,” the experts called them: cold women who had frozen their children into silence. It took decades to retire that idea, and no one apologized for it.

Their daughters became the mothers of the 1990s and 2000s who watched a talking, laughing child go quiet after a round of shots, said so, and were told they had imagined the child they remembered. They were called hysterical, then anti-science, then dangerous. The one thing they were almost never called was witnesses.

The system they reported to was built not to hear them. In 1986, Congress shielded vaccine makers from most lawsuits and created a no-fault compensation program in their place; in 2011 the Supreme Court confirmed that the courthouse door stays shut. The program’s own reporting system, VAERS, is voluntary, and a federally funded Harvard study in 2010 found it captures fewer than one percent of adverse events. In 2008 the government quietly conceded one child’s case, Hannah Poling’s, agreeing that vaccines had aggravated an underlying disorder and produced “features of autism.” The next year, in a single omnibus proceeding, it turned away roughly five thousand families at once.

So when a mother said, “I saw my child regress,” here is what she had: no lawsuit, a reporting system that recorded almost nothing, a compensation program that had admitted one case and shut the door on thousands, and a public conversation that treated her memory as misinformation.

That is the history on page 17 of the Gates Foundation’s 2010 report. Its authors conceded that some adverse events after immunization are “real.” They proposed watching the mothers anyway.

The forward

On February 3, 2012, an email from inside the Foundation’s world was forwarded to jeevacation@gmail.com, Jeffrey Epstein’s private address. It carried the Foundation’s internal immunization strategy and that 2010 report. The note on top read: “Can we discuss this over the weekend?”

Then it got to the point. The sender referred to an immunization idea credited to Epstein himself, “your idea about Mother’s Army,” and closed: “Check out the slides. See if you think it is appropriate. If you do, I will make the proposal and the deck.”




Read that again. More than three years after Epstein pleaded guilty to procuring a minor, someone with the Foundation’s vaccine strategy in hand was asking whether his idea about mothers was appropriate enough to pitch.

The sender’s name is redacted. The Justice Department knows it. We don’t.

What they built, in order

I was one of the mothers’ questions. Not literally, but in the system’s logic I was worse: a researcher who gathered the peer-reviewed studies those questions pointed to and made them free to read. Here is what happened next, from the record, in the order it happened.

2012. The Foundation funded a university researcher to study online “anti-vaccine” messaging. I reported it that August.
2013. A UNICEF working paper tracking “anti-vaccination sentiment” listed GreenMedInfo among the sites it monitored. The surveillance system had a list now, and I was on it.
2018 to 2019. GreenMedInfo’s search visibility fell 81 percent. In June 2019 our email provider shut us down without notice.
May 2020. A British think tank, with the BBC, published a list of 34 websites. We were sixth.
March 2021. The Center for Countering Digital Hate named twelve people its “Disinformation Dozen.” I was one. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was another. That July the President of the United States said of us: “It’s killing people.” The platforms did the rest. In August, Facebook itself said the twelve accounted for a tiny fraction of vaccine content. It didn’t matter.
October 2024. CCDH’s internal minutes leaked: plans for “roundtables” with a vaccine alliance so an issue that had “fallen off the radar” could be brought back, and a line attributed to its chief executive about “black ops being set up” around Kennedy.
February 2026. CCDH’s founder resigned as the British Prime Minister’s chief of staff.
I covered the entire arc of this story in my CHD in DC presentation on Constitution Day, Sept 17th. You can watch it here.

Fourteen years. A plan, a grant, a list, a label, a presidential sentence, and a leak. I used to think I was imagining the machine. The documents say I wasn’t.

I will not claim more than they show. Nothing here proves the Foundation directed the list or the label. That restraint is not weakness; it is the whole point of the book, and it is the one thing the people who labeled us never extended to us.

The man they asked

Now the part that should stop every natural health advocate cold.

The institution whose consultants proposed watching mothers was, in the same years, in correspondence with a convicted sex offender about its money. In 2011 Epstein pitched JPMorgan a fund to capture the “more than 60 billion” America’s billionaires had pledged to give away. “IT will be the largest foundation in the world,” he wrote. (EFTA00904739)

And on July 9, 2017, he wrote to Bill Gates proposing that philanthropists be “orgazanized to decide a shadow governmental grants structure.”

Email from Jeffrey Epstein to Bill Gates, July 9, 2017, DOJ file EFTA01041100


Email from Jeffrey Epstein to Bill Gates, July 9, 2017. U.S. Department of Justice, EFTA01041100.
The typo is his. So is the word. The record shows no reply.

Think about what a shadow governmental grants structure decides. Which research is funded. Which health programs run where. Which questions count as science and which count as “rumors.” Governments make those decisions in public, under oath, subject to a vote. Epstein’s proposal was to make them privately, by a group organized, in his words, “to blunt” the “bad pr risk.”

We have been arguing with that structure for fifteen years. We just couldn’t see who was in the room. Now we can. One of them was Jeffrey Epstein, and he was being asked for his ideas about mothers.

Go deeper, with the documents

From the Gates Foundation to Epstein’s Inbox to the Disinformation Dozen
Fourteen years of documents, read in the order they were written. The plan, the money, the list, and the label.

“We May Need to Do a Bit of Damage Control”: Inside NIAID’s Ebola Vaccine Crisis
What happened inside a federal institute, from Senate records, when its own vaccine experiment produced lung damage in the animals it was meant to protect.

Why this book

Shadow Empire: The Epstein Files is not a book about vaccines. It is a book about an architecture: a fund, an offshore option, a private back channel through a single Gmail inbox, a science program that reached from the human genome to a budget for a “designer baby and human cloning company,” and the institutions that kept answering Epstein’s email for a decade after his conviction.

But it was written by one of the twelve. And it was written for everyone who was ever told that their question was the danger.

Every claim the case rests on carries a footnote to a document you can pull from justice.gov/epstein. Each chapter says what it establishes and what it does not. Every correction will be logged, with its date, at shadowempirebook.com/corrections.

Your turn

For fifteen years they told you not to look. So look.

Go to justice.gov/epstein. Type EFTA00702570. Read the note about “Mother’s Army.” Then type EFTA01041100 and read the word “shadow” in Epstein’s own hand.

Then decide who was spreading rumors.

If you want to go further, I made a free guide: Start Here: 12 Documents in the Epstein Files, and How to Read Them. Each entry has the original page, what it shows, what it doesn’t prove, and a link to check it yourself.

[tim]

https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/ ... medium=web

In memory of those who “died suddenly” in the United States and worldwide, October 5-12, 2026

Actors Amber Siyavus (46), RJ Mitte (34); movie producer Linda Duncombe; singer Freddie Jackson; rapper Sam King; hoopster Heidi Horton (54, C); boxer Wilfredo Gómez; wrestler Jeff Cannonball; & more

MARK CRISPIN MILLER
OCT 14, 2026

A survey of the likely global toll of COVID “vaccination,” based on the reports collected by our worldwide team of researchers this past week.