If you believe in a Virgin Birth, which is impossible from geneticCool Breeze wrote: ↑Mon Jan 24, 2022 11:38 am> I understand what you are saying, but should one not call things
> for what they are? If we can do genetic tests that disprove claims
> of various aspects of Mormonism, beyond all the other dubious
> claims, should we not do that?
science, then what right have you to question genetic tests on
Mormons?
If you believe that someone can walk on water, or if you believe that
someone can rise after being dead for three days, which should be
impossible, then what right have you to question anyone else's
religion?
If you are honest and earnest, though it might be hard hitting, the
truth is put out plainly on media like this.
If you believe in a religion that has, throughout history, committedCool Breeze wrote: ↑Mon Jan 24, 2022 11:38 am> Should we not point out that Muhammad is not a good example to
> live by (the opposite of the claim of islam), if you examine his
> life?
various forms of genocide and ethnic cleansing, then what right have
you to question the lives of people of other religions?
If you are honest and earnest, though it might be hard hitting, the
truth is put out plainly on media like this.
The problem with the internet is that there are too many people likeCool Breeze wrote: ↑Mon Jan 24, 2022 11:38 am> That's what I'm getting at. If you can't do it on the internet,
> you surely aren't going to do it in many places. That's the value,
> social etiquette is removed and if you are honest and earnest,
> though it might be hard hitting, the truth is put out plainly on
> media like this. Is there a lot of garbage to sift through on the
> internet at the same time? Yes, that's a cost that's fairly large
> to the benefit, since anyone can post anything, indeed.
yourself who don't know shit but who think that they're so smart that
they have the right to offend anyone at will.
"Social etiquette" means not making a jackass of yourself every day.