The reason for my interest in the emp attack is because of the claimHiggenbotham wrote: > An EMP attack isn't high on my list of worries either. That's
> because there are easier (and probably much more reliable - with
> emphasis on the word "much") ways to create havoc.
> I'd posted a little bit about Buffett's meeting over the weekend
> in the other thread. Buffett is an insurance man. Along this
> vein, I believe he said in the meeting that he estimates a 2%
> yearly chance of a cyber attack that causes greater than $400
> billion in damage. I believe he also said that is his number one
> worry.
that it would kill 90% of the population within a year.
Buffett isn't worried about killing off the population. He just wants
to make money.