Financial topics

[aedens]

http://24ahead.com/harry-reids-strong-1 ... ve-blocked
Yellow dogs got what was expected.

Democratic Party supports massive/illegal immigration, and it isn't because they're "compassionate". http://24ahead.com/s/tea-parties lulz
No , they are products.

[aedens]

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-04-0 ... -unleashed

80:20 market since twenty percent do not need it and the eighty cannot ever pay for it.

“In God we trust; all others must bring data.” 10/12

http://metttc.com/

[gerald]

Ah yes the rule of law --

Martin Armstrong: "Hillary Commits A Crime And They Defend Her" http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-04-0 ... defend-her

You cannot get around the fact that what she did was criminal for when all those emails were subpoenaed by Congress, she failed to produce them or inform Congress she had a secret personal email. That is outright OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE and anyone else would go to prison for 5 years. Then when they are discovered, she erases the files. Come on! Why are there three sets of laws – (1) for Democrats, (2) for Republicans, and (3) for the rest of us?

-----------------------------------

"Let them eat cake."

[aedens]

Cake in the cave to avoid.

The problem, as Socrates indicates in his famous cave analogy, is that the ignorant can never be taught or “persuaded” to recognize the prudence of individuals who actually have it. Because such individuals will necessarily challenge both the truth and the wisdom of popular opinion, especially when it is fueled by popular passions, the truly prudent will arouse the anger and enmity of the mob. Recognizing this, the truly prudent will never seek to rule and the many will not force them to do so. The friendship Socrates declares he has just made with Thrasymachus does not entail a hope or belief that rhetoric can overcome the tension between philosophy and politics (or popular opinions and passions). The friendship between Socrates and Thrasymachus is based rather on two agreements they share, which Socrates’ three interlocutors in the Gorgias do not. Socrates and Thrasymachus think that the best speaker is the one who can refute another in argument—whether or not everyone else listening is persuaded. In contrast to eristic sophists like Euthydemus, however, neither Socrates nor Thrasymachus maintains that victory in speech is virtuous or good in itself. Socrates and Thrasymachus both respect arguments or speeches as opposed merely to “what works” in fact or deed, because they both also agree that it is necessary to know what is truly good or to one’s advantage. Speeches or arguments are merely means of acquiring knowledge of what is truly good. According to a definition of friendship Socrates proposes in the Lysis (216c-217a), he and Thrasymachus can become friends, because lacking the good, they nevertheless seek it. Thrasymachus is confused about the goodness or virtue of justice, and thus shifts sides in the course of his exchange with Socrates, because he has not thought out the relation between his admiration of power and wealth, on the one hand, and his conviction that it is necessary to know what is truly in one’s own advantage, on the other. It is not clear from the Republic or any other Platonic dialogue exactly what impression or lesson Thrasymachus took away from the conversation. But unlike Gorgias, Thrasymachus is never said to have “solved” the tension by declaring that it is impossible to teach virtue and ridiculing those who claimed to do so.

In Plato, the charge that Socrates is ironic is explicitly an expression of a failure on the part of the accuser, including the people of Athens, to believe that any intelligent, clever speaker like Socrates really thinks that virtues like justice and moderation and piety are good for the individual.

No in the strict terms I am not a Strauss observant either. Consider the news this week alone. Any more question would entail actual thought to why they persist at current scale when they fail at the current.

[aedens]

http://legacy.utsandiego.com/news/state ... rapes.html the fisher multiplier model and zirp - machines can only do so much as we are

http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle ... story.html

http://www2.bloomberglaw.com/public/des ... 3_Court_/1

[gerald]

Cake in the cave to avoid.

The problem, as Socrates indicates in his famous cave analogy, is that the ignorant can never be taught or “persuaded” to recognize the prudence of individuals who actually have it. Because such individuals will necessarily challenge both the truth and the wisdom of popular opinion, especially when it is fueled by popular passions, the truly prudent will arouse the anger and enmity of the mob. Recognizing this, the truly prudent will never seek to rule and the many will not force them to do so. The friendship Socrates declares he has just made with Thrasymachus does not entail a hope or belief that rhetoric can overcome the tension between philosophy and politics (or popular opinions and passions). The friendship between Socrates and Thrasymachus is based rather on two agreements they share, which Socrates’ three interlocutors in the Gorgias do not. Socrates and Thrasymachus think that the best speaker is the one who can refute another in argument—whether or not everyone else listening is persuaded. In contrast to eristic sophists like Euthydemus, however, neither Socrates nor Thrasymachus maintains that victory in speech is virtuous or good in itself. Socrates and Thrasymachus both respect arguments or speeches as opposed merely to “what works” in fact or deed, because they both also agree that it is necessary to know what is truly good or to one’s advantage. Speeches or arguments are merely means of acquiring knowledge of what is truly good. According to a definition of friendship Socrates proposes in the Lysis (216c-217a), he and Thrasymachus can become friends, because lacking the good, they nevertheless seek it. Thrasymachus is confused about the goodness or virtue of justice, and thus shifts sides in the course of his exchange with Socrates, because he has not thought out the relation between his admiration of power and wealth, on the one hand, and his conviction that it is necessary to know what is truly in one’s own advantage, on the other. It is not clear from the Republic or any other Platonic dialogue exactly what impression or lesson Thrasymachus took away from the conversation. But unlike Gorgias, Thrasymachus is never said to have “solved” the tension by declaring that it is impossible to teach virtue and ridiculing those who claimed to do so.

In Plato, the charge that Socrates is ironic is explicitly an expression of a failure on the part of the accuser, including the people of Athens, to believe that any intelligent, clever speaker like Socrates really thinks that virtues like justice and moderation and piety are good for the individual.

No in the strict terms I am not a Strauss observant either. Consider the news this week alone. Any more question would entail actual thought to why they persist at current scale when they fail at the current.

Your above is an explanation for the "Groundhog Day " phenomenon.

[aedens]

Nice one here I like also. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-04-0 ... -ever-need

[gerald]

Richard Duncan: The Real Risk Of A Coming Multi-Decade Global Depression http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-04-0 ... depression

"This is not going to be a 1921-style two-year recession that we bounce back from after a little bit of pain and unpleasantness. After a 50-year global economic boon involving what is now a $59 trillion expansion of credit in 50 years, this isn’t going to be a one or two-year hard recession. This is going to be a multi-decade global depression and I’m not sure that anyone alive today would live long enough to see the recovery. I mean, it’s like Rome: when Rome fell, there was a recovery, but it was 1,000 years later"

Hmmm happy days are here --- sarcasm

However, if you listen to the video --a bit long, this could be a pivoting point for humanity , for the better, hmmm

[gerald]

Your source for financial advice --- http://www.financialpaparazzi.com/

for the above

"DISCLAIMER: All the content in this website was produced by delusional people. If you believe anything you see or hear in these pages, or feel offended in any way, there´s a good chance you may be an idiot. See a doctor and close the door when you leave."

----------------------------------------
and how much different is the "real" news?

[aedens]

http://www.goldensextant.com/Gibson%27sParadox.html

They knew exactly what they where doing with the dislocation. Rubin and Summers. Brooksley Born is Twice as smart as them both.
The red circling on housing was a political non starter, and proven inept. They knew on the Senate flow in 2005. The CCI account was the
clean up crew from the 1983 papers. Taxpayers never had a chance with these predators.

http://winteractionables.com/?p=19769

http://archive.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/ir/Ch13.html We where lucky some say...
http://wn.com/madeleine_albright_justif ... hildren_as_

http://rense.com/general77/balk.htm The spillover effects are fact.

Seymour Lipset, the historian said, "Great nations don't die, they commit national suicide."

No, the white flag zones shift, and are as to what Malachi Martin already knew.