http://harvardnsj.org/wp-content/upload ... _Final.pdf
Hydra effect with bam bam with pop eye and the carrier.
All four understood what was to be so.
Do no harm has been judged.
http://thefreethoughtproject.com/7-bee- ... ndangered/
Financial topics
Re: Financial topics
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/718 ... s-violence
Noske moments.
http://gdxforum.com/forum/search.php?ke ... sf=msgonly
GD and the wave it predicts.
Noske moments.
http://gdxforum.com/forum/search.php?ke ... sf=msgonly
GD and the wave it predicts.
Re: Financial topics
http://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/halsall/ ... xiad01.asp
Few have seen the gate. They know who they are.
Understanding the difference between the "kingdom" program for Israel and the "grace" program for us is the key.
Not our problem since two witnesses will indeed show the actual hour.
As it was said before on intelligence. The slain saints of the tribulation plead for vengeance in Revelation 6:10, "And they cried with a loud voice, saying, How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?" Contrast this with the martyr Stephen's last words: "... Lord, lay not this sin to their charge ..." (Acts 7:60). This attitude of vengeance is not a characteristic of those indwelt by the Holy Spirit. Unlike the believers today, these Revelation 6 believers, which resolves itself some suggest, are not indwelt by the Holy Spirit it was conveyed. Besides, Christians who have studied God's Word would not have to ask "How long?" They would already know, as was described in the "We do not know the day"
You have the right to defend yourself. Unless you think yours are not worthy.
http://rare.us/story/chicago-cop-who-wa ... -backlash/
As noted ---- Something doesn't add up in this story. There were 3 cops involved. This one suspect beat up 3 cops? None of them used their gun? And none of the cops involved commented, it was a supervisor who says the lady cop was afraid to use her gun out of concern for legal ramifications.
The one thing for sure in this incident is that nobody got killed. Interesting. Now, if 3 cops can't handle a suspect without killing him, I'd suggest police tactics need to be examined.
Well the report was ----- The Chicago Tribune reports that the officer stopped at a crash scene on the West Side in the morning hours of Oct. 5 when she got into a struggle with a man who was allegedly high on PCP. The erratic suspect smashed her face into the pavement over and over again until she was unconscious, police reported.
==========================================================================================================
Anyways what we knew was not what was known. As it was conveyed the unknown, unknowns will never go away for now.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Menu Some of us just consider the arc of instability ongoing today also.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nero
I consider also the more wine sealed and produced in lead the faster they went, insane.
Locally in Flint in read Shigellosis is starting to get away from health officials.
Later as we also know the higher the avarice per se of the life style the infirmities accounts appear to increase per capita.
Go ahead look at your keyboards today and who cleans them, or would consider touching them as example.
http://www.sheffield.ac.uk/news/nr/roma ... e-1.567068
There's a very important point here. It's the popularity of genocidal leaders that makes the genocidal acts possible. An unpopular leader could never get away with trying to exterminate an entire religious or ethnic group....
Bonhoeffer was further harassed by the Nazi authorities as he was forbidden to speak in public and was required to regularly report his activities to the police. In 1941, he was forbidden to print or to publish.
In the face of Nazi atrocities, the full scale of which Bonhoeffer learned through the Abwehr, he concluded that "the ultimate question for a responsible man to ask is not how he is to extricate himself heroically from the affair, but how the coming generation shall continue to live.
Unpopular leaders may need some refinement on the ability to not dispense with groups since in Rome you did not report until Caesar was a very cold funeral pyre. I assert also you are correct in many areas of research also. The fish rots from the head down in all cultures.
A democrat insists they know better, and a republican who knows they are right are both dangerous to taxpayers we consider correct.
Basic stipends will suffice since both are over paid we consider since they do not provide a service to us may be considered correct
since they doubled the wages better to serve us they contended. Revolving door politics serves them, not us.
A notable example of a high-status slave was Tiro, the secretary of Cicero. Tiro was freed before his master's death, and was successful enough to retire on his own country estate, where he died at the age of 99.
The Stoic had more brains but less power until they came over the seven hills. The point is where to put the spoke as Bonheoffer warned us.
Who served better?
thread: 1202.
Few have seen the gate. They know who they are.
Understanding the difference between the "kingdom" program for Israel and the "grace" program for us is the key.
Not our problem since two witnesses will indeed show the actual hour.
As it was said before on intelligence. The slain saints of the tribulation plead for vengeance in Revelation 6:10, "And they cried with a loud voice, saying, How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?" Contrast this with the martyr Stephen's last words: "... Lord, lay not this sin to their charge ..." (Acts 7:60). This attitude of vengeance is not a characteristic of those indwelt by the Holy Spirit. Unlike the believers today, these Revelation 6 believers, which resolves itself some suggest, are not indwelt by the Holy Spirit it was conveyed. Besides, Christians who have studied God's Word would not have to ask "How long?" They would already know, as was described in the "We do not know the day"
You have the right to defend yourself. Unless you think yours are not worthy.
http://rare.us/story/chicago-cop-who-wa ... -backlash/
As noted ---- Something doesn't add up in this story. There were 3 cops involved. This one suspect beat up 3 cops? None of them used their gun? And none of the cops involved commented, it was a supervisor who says the lady cop was afraid to use her gun out of concern for legal ramifications.
The one thing for sure in this incident is that nobody got killed. Interesting. Now, if 3 cops can't handle a suspect without killing him, I'd suggest police tactics need to be examined.
Well the report was ----- The Chicago Tribune reports that the officer stopped at a crash scene on the West Side in the morning hours of Oct. 5 when she got into a struggle with a man who was allegedly high on PCP. The erratic suspect smashed her face into the pavement over and over again until she was unconscious, police reported.
==========================================================================================================
Anyways what we knew was not what was known. As it was conveyed the unknown, unknowns will never go away for now.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Menu Some of us just consider the arc of instability ongoing today also.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nero
I consider also the more wine sealed and produced in lead the faster they went, insane.
Locally in Flint in read Shigellosis is starting to get away from health officials.
Later as we also know the higher the avarice per se of the life style the infirmities accounts appear to increase per capita.
Go ahead look at your keyboards today and who cleans them, or would consider touching them as example.
http://www.sheffield.ac.uk/news/nr/roma ... e-1.567068
There's a very important point here. It's the popularity of genocidal leaders that makes the genocidal acts possible. An unpopular leader could never get away with trying to exterminate an entire religious or ethnic group....
Bonhoeffer was further harassed by the Nazi authorities as he was forbidden to speak in public and was required to regularly report his activities to the police. In 1941, he was forbidden to print or to publish.
In the face of Nazi atrocities, the full scale of which Bonhoeffer learned through the Abwehr, he concluded that "the ultimate question for a responsible man to ask is not how he is to extricate himself heroically from the affair, but how the coming generation shall continue to live.
Unpopular leaders may need some refinement on the ability to not dispense with groups since in Rome you did not report until Caesar was a very cold funeral pyre. I assert also you are correct in many areas of research also. The fish rots from the head down in all cultures.
A democrat insists they know better, and a republican who knows they are right are both dangerous to taxpayers we consider correct.
Basic stipends will suffice since both are over paid we consider since they do not provide a service to us may be considered correct
since they doubled the wages better to serve us they contended. Revolving door politics serves them, not us.
A notable example of a high-status slave was Tiro, the secretary of Cicero. Tiro was freed before his master's death, and was successful enough to retire on his own country estate, where he died at the age of 99.
The Stoic had more brains but less power until they came over the seven hills. The point is where to put the spoke as Bonheoffer warned us.
Who served better?
thread: 1202.
Last edited by aedens on Sat Oct 08, 2016 11:09 am, edited 3 times in total.
Re: Financial topics
spoke meets wheel
YHC-FTSE •Oct 7, 2016 10:52 PM
This may be deeply unpopular here, but I'll add my pittance of opinion.
For those who have already made up their minds to vote Trump, this is not for you. Rather, I wanted to implore the Hillary supporters (If we have any left these days), the undecided, the apathetic and the disgusted who would rather not give credence to the farce of the elections by participating. Many of these Americans, informed or not, face a difficult choice in the coming weeks. It is not difficult because the choices are so vague and familar but because they are, or appear to be, several several sigmas off the reservation. You are constantly being bombarded by lies in the media, seemingly offered a choice between a reality tv personality and a career politician who is familiar in power. Believe it or not, many of you reading this are hardwired to obey authority - it's one of the tricks of psychology that people in power use to control large swathes of the population. Look up Solomon Asch's experiments if you want to know more. You will notice that Hillary has worked hard to establish her authority credentials, even going as far as wearing chairman Mao's castoffs and her speeches are formulaic beyond the point of cliches.
Anyway, thanks to a completely captive mainstream media, perhaps you have missed some news about Hillary Clinton:
About the massive $100 billion charity fraud machine that is the Clinton Foundation;
About the growing list of dead journalists, ex-body guards, business associates and the like who tried to blow the whistle on the Clintons;
About the list of Zionists and shady oligarchs who fund the Clinton presidential campaign - those who have a vested interest in milking America dry to the last drop before leading it to slaughter.;
About the allegations of fraud in the one time donations to her campaign, the wholesale corrupt nepotism of selling cushy government jobs to her biggest donors,
I won't go into the rumours about her physical and mental health, the DNC's plot to kill the Sander's campaign, voter fraud, email scandals, the constant lies blaming Russia to divert attention away from the contents of the leaks and many others which you may have read about already.
The things is, some of you have already decided to vote for Hillary no matter what and some of you have decided to do nothing despite the overwhelming evidence that she is not only unfit for office, but a revolting criminal of epic proportions walking free at the centre of a corrupt and compliant criminal justice system unwilling to prosecute her. How can you stand by and let such a creature take the highest office in the land?
Under ordinary circumstances, Donald Trump is not a man I would endorse. In fact, I'm not sure I would enjoy drinking a beer with the man - which is a test I put to all my new acquaintances before I would call them a friend. In comparison to the smooth, practiced (& therefore authorative) delivery of Hillary's speeches, I have cringed at his lack of oratory skills during the last debate. His flippant attitude, the bullying of those he believes beneath him, the ease with which he slips into bigotry and what passes for his hair annoy me. But, I understand the man because I have met the same sort in my clubs, boardrooms, locker rooms and dining rooms throughout my life. He is, to me, the quintessential businessman, not quite first class in the brains department, but hardworking with his own ideas on how things should be done. I understand him and I know he is not bad, which relatively speaking, makes him a saint in comparison to his opponent.
He is, as far as I know, not (yet) beholden to the establishment, as clearly evidenced by the lack of mainstream media support. And the best thing? He has no political history. If I know the Zionists they will be busy trying to get him under their control right now. He has a simple mission to control immigration, create jobs (Somehow) and most important for me, stop the escalation of impending world war being triggered by the Yinon Plan or the necon's PNAC by the neocon zionists. Quite frankly, I don't think anything can be done about America's economic woes but I do care passionately about peace. For my world, my country, my friends and my loved ones. I am and have been most of my adult life, anti-war and I believe very strongly that Hillary represents an existential threat to humanity. Just as neo-conservatism is a zionist construct in disguise, she is a true establishment operator using the "First Woman President" circus and the farce of "Caring for gays & minorities", the sick joke of a "Humanitarian war" and the like - the plucking of the heartstrings of those who like to think of themselves as fair and decent to get your votes. Take a good look at Hillary's work at the State Dept and you will see that together with Victoria Nuland she has destroyed millions of lives in Ukraine (with the neo-nazi Maidan), Syria (with Al-Queda and ISIS), Libya and Palestine. The creature is pure evil.
Trump may be many things but he is not a proven mass murderer, a compulsive liar who hides behind a PC facade, a fraudster and warmonger. It is not an option to abstain from adding your voice of discontent to the establishment. All of our lives may depend on what happens in the coming weeks, so I implore to your common sense and good judgement to hold your nose and vote for Trump. Vote and raise hell about the election fraud that is sure to follow from Hillary.
The article is wrong about its title. For all his money, Trump most reminds me of the average guy. I reckon the contest is the unknown common man -v- absolute establishment evil masquerading as the caring candidate.
YHC-FTSE •Oct 7, 2016 10:52 PM
This may be deeply unpopular here, but I'll add my pittance of opinion.
For those who have already made up their minds to vote Trump, this is not for you. Rather, I wanted to implore the Hillary supporters (If we have any left these days), the undecided, the apathetic and the disgusted who would rather not give credence to the farce of the elections by participating. Many of these Americans, informed or not, face a difficult choice in the coming weeks. It is not difficult because the choices are so vague and familar but because they are, or appear to be, several several sigmas off the reservation. You are constantly being bombarded by lies in the media, seemingly offered a choice between a reality tv personality and a career politician who is familiar in power. Believe it or not, many of you reading this are hardwired to obey authority - it's one of the tricks of psychology that people in power use to control large swathes of the population. Look up Solomon Asch's experiments if you want to know more. You will notice that Hillary has worked hard to establish her authority credentials, even going as far as wearing chairman Mao's castoffs and her speeches are formulaic beyond the point of cliches.
Anyway, thanks to a completely captive mainstream media, perhaps you have missed some news about Hillary Clinton:
About the massive $100 billion charity fraud machine that is the Clinton Foundation;
About the growing list of dead journalists, ex-body guards, business associates and the like who tried to blow the whistle on the Clintons;
About the list of Zionists and shady oligarchs who fund the Clinton presidential campaign - those who have a vested interest in milking America dry to the last drop before leading it to slaughter.;
About the allegations of fraud in the one time donations to her campaign, the wholesale corrupt nepotism of selling cushy government jobs to her biggest donors,
I won't go into the rumours about her physical and mental health, the DNC's plot to kill the Sander's campaign, voter fraud, email scandals, the constant lies blaming Russia to divert attention away from the contents of the leaks and many others which you may have read about already.
The things is, some of you have already decided to vote for Hillary no matter what and some of you have decided to do nothing despite the overwhelming evidence that she is not only unfit for office, but a revolting criminal of epic proportions walking free at the centre of a corrupt and compliant criminal justice system unwilling to prosecute her. How can you stand by and let such a creature take the highest office in the land?
Under ordinary circumstances, Donald Trump is not a man I would endorse. In fact, I'm not sure I would enjoy drinking a beer with the man - which is a test I put to all my new acquaintances before I would call them a friend. In comparison to the smooth, practiced (& therefore authorative) delivery of Hillary's speeches, I have cringed at his lack of oratory skills during the last debate. His flippant attitude, the bullying of those he believes beneath him, the ease with which he slips into bigotry and what passes for his hair annoy me. But, I understand the man because I have met the same sort in my clubs, boardrooms, locker rooms and dining rooms throughout my life. He is, to me, the quintessential businessman, not quite first class in the brains department, but hardworking with his own ideas on how things should be done. I understand him and I know he is not bad, which relatively speaking, makes him a saint in comparison to his opponent.
He is, as far as I know, not (yet) beholden to the establishment, as clearly evidenced by the lack of mainstream media support. And the best thing? He has no political history. If I know the Zionists they will be busy trying to get him under their control right now. He has a simple mission to control immigration, create jobs (Somehow) and most important for me, stop the escalation of impending world war being triggered by the Yinon Plan or the necon's PNAC by the neocon zionists. Quite frankly, I don't think anything can be done about America's economic woes but I do care passionately about peace. For my world, my country, my friends and my loved ones. I am and have been most of my adult life, anti-war and I believe very strongly that Hillary represents an existential threat to humanity. Just as neo-conservatism is a zionist construct in disguise, she is a true establishment operator using the "First Woman President" circus and the farce of "Caring for gays & minorities", the sick joke of a "Humanitarian war" and the like - the plucking of the heartstrings of those who like to think of themselves as fair and decent to get your votes. Take a good look at Hillary's work at the State Dept and you will see that together with Victoria Nuland she has destroyed millions of lives in Ukraine (with the neo-nazi Maidan), Syria (with Al-Queda and ISIS), Libya and Palestine. The creature is pure evil.
Trump may be many things but he is not a proven mass murderer, a compulsive liar who hides behind a PC facade, a fraudster and warmonger. It is not an option to abstain from adding your voice of discontent to the establishment. All of our lives may depend on what happens in the coming weeks, so I implore to your common sense and good judgement to hold your nose and vote for Trump. Vote and raise hell about the election fraud that is sure to follow from Hillary.
The article is wrong about its title. For all his money, Trump most reminds me of the average guy. I reckon the contest is the unknown common man -v- absolute establishment evil masquerading as the caring candidate.
Re: Financial topics
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/ ... ail-merger
Quote from a friend "what problem since DC Market is fine" This was last year all the numbers today tells the tale of lets say 2 city's. We know what we see and it is what it is. There is no single index used to calculate beta. We posted causation issues that the interest rate in New York has nothing to do with North Dakota and the Liberal Keynesians always flatly ignore reality. Consumers are found and as a article earlier forwarded they are pushed around like vegtables on a plate.
There can be no recovery since we all know malinvestment must be cleared from the incompetant to competant individuals but this must press further to acountabilty.
Notes: Monday, Oct. 07, 1985
In 1932, with international trade in collapse, Franklin Roosevelt denounced Smoot-Hawley as ruinous. Hoover responded that Roosevelt would have Americans compete with "peasant and sweated labor" abroad. Then, as now, protectionism had a strong if superficial political appeal: by election eve, F.D.R. had backed down, assuring voters that he understood the need for tariffs. Protectionist politicking, however, could not save the Republicans in 1932. Smoot and Hawley joined Hoover in defeat. The Democrats dismantled the G.O.P.'s legislative handiwork with caution, using reciprocal trade agreements rather than across-the-board tariff reductions. The Smoot-Hawley approach was discredited. Sam Rayburn, House Democratic Speaker from 1940 until 1961, insisted that any party member who wanted to serve on the Ways and Means Committee had to support reciprocity, not protectionism. We shall see. Amos warned us. Nov 15, 2009
Kahn fell off his horse at 62 and died, 50 years later the route from the Yellow sea to Caspian sea was open for trade.
"Violence is the vestige of the incompetent" -- Really? Who won WWII, how did Gengas Kahn create his empire, what did Alexander the Great do, how was the US of A created, etc,
USof A is now, and was grain colony since the Bankers wars. Ask Lincoln and who guarded the Gold reserves of San Francisco as not upset the currency markets during the slaughter of the sheep.
1861 Internecine Slaughter, not a civil war..... “I have two great enemies, the Southern Army in front of me, and the financial institutions in the rear. Of the two, the one in my rear is my greatest foe.”
One month after the inauguration of President Abraham Lincoln, the American Civil War got underway . . .
The real reason for the war is that . . .
Northern industrialists had used trade tariffs to prevent the Southern States from buying cheaper European goods. Europe subsequently retaliated by stopping cotton imports from the South. Thus the South were being forced to pay more for goods whilst having their income slashed.
This is when the money changers saw the opportunity to divide and conquer America by plunging it into Civil War. This is confirmed by Otto Von Bismarck when he was Chancellor of Germany (1871 - 1890), who stated, "The division of the United States into federations of equal force was decided long before the Civil War by the high financial powers of Europe, these bankers were afraid that the United States if they remained as one block and as one nation, would attain economic and financial independence which would upset their financial domination over the world.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/ ... nions1.jpg
When you have 50 year plans it appears maybe the black plague was really not much of an accident.
Washington wants to cut the «Silk Road», while Moscow wants to destroy the jihadists.
The win / win will not be on sticky notes any time soon....
Yes he had a professional army well paid and organized also.
The plainsman's of the origin of the plague seen the effects and moved from that area and never caught it.
They simply observed and learned from the nature of things. Who knows but I observed no monarchs this years.
Quote from a friend "what problem since DC Market is fine" This was last year all the numbers today tells the tale of lets say 2 city's. We know what we see and it is what it is. There is no single index used to calculate beta. We posted causation issues that the interest rate in New York has nothing to do with North Dakota and the Liberal Keynesians always flatly ignore reality. Consumers are found and as a article earlier forwarded they are pushed around like vegtables on a plate.
There can be no recovery since we all know malinvestment must be cleared from the incompetant to competant individuals but this must press further to acountabilty.
Notes: Monday, Oct. 07, 1985
In 1932, with international trade in collapse, Franklin Roosevelt denounced Smoot-Hawley as ruinous. Hoover responded that Roosevelt would have Americans compete with "peasant and sweated labor" abroad. Then, as now, protectionism had a strong if superficial political appeal: by election eve, F.D.R. had backed down, assuring voters that he understood the need for tariffs. Protectionist politicking, however, could not save the Republicans in 1932. Smoot and Hawley joined Hoover in defeat. The Democrats dismantled the G.O.P.'s legislative handiwork with caution, using reciprocal trade agreements rather than across-the-board tariff reductions. The Smoot-Hawley approach was discredited. Sam Rayburn, House Democratic Speaker from 1940 until 1961, insisted that any party member who wanted to serve on the Ways and Means Committee had to support reciprocity, not protectionism. We shall see. Amos warned us. Nov 15, 2009
Kahn fell off his horse at 62 and died, 50 years later the route from the Yellow sea to Caspian sea was open for trade.
"Violence is the vestige of the incompetent" -- Really? Who won WWII, how did Gengas Kahn create his empire, what did Alexander the Great do, how was the US of A created, etc,
USof A is now, and was grain colony since the Bankers wars. Ask Lincoln and who guarded the Gold reserves of San Francisco as not upset the currency markets during the slaughter of the sheep.
1861 Internecine Slaughter, not a civil war..... “I have two great enemies, the Southern Army in front of me, and the financial institutions in the rear. Of the two, the one in my rear is my greatest foe.”
One month after the inauguration of President Abraham Lincoln, the American Civil War got underway . . .
The real reason for the war is that . . .
Northern industrialists had used trade tariffs to prevent the Southern States from buying cheaper European goods. Europe subsequently retaliated by stopping cotton imports from the South. Thus the South were being forced to pay more for goods whilst having their income slashed.
This is when the money changers saw the opportunity to divide and conquer America by plunging it into Civil War. This is confirmed by Otto Von Bismarck when he was Chancellor of Germany (1871 - 1890), who stated, "The division of the United States into federations of equal force was decided long before the Civil War by the high financial powers of Europe, these bankers were afraid that the United States if they remained as one block and as one nation, would attain economic and financial independence which would upset their financial domination over the world.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/ ... nions1.jpg
When you have 50 year plans it appears maybe the black plague was really not much of an accident.
Washington wants to cut the «Silk Road», while Moscow wants to destroy the jihadists.
The win / win will not be on sticky notes any time soon....
Yes he had a professional army well paid and organized also.
The plainsman's of the origin of the plague seen the effects and moved from that area and never caught it.
They simply observed and learned from the nature of things. Who knows but I observed no monarchs this years.
Last edited by aedens on Sat Oct 08, 2016 1:28 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Re: Financial topics
https://prayfor.us/roll-call-who-defended-america/ guess who did not
Re: Financial topics
http://carnegie-mec.org/diwan/54509?lang=en
https://nikitamalik.com/
Of Iran’s regional ambitions, he says, the Islamic Republic’s underlying aims have long been consistent, but its strategy for achieving those objectives is flexible. However, rampant sectarianism and antipathy toward Iran in the Sunni Arab world represent obstacles to its ambitions. Iran may help win the war in Syria, Sadjadpour predicts, but it cannot win the peace.
Fulcrum of reality:
Iran doesn’t employ public relations agencies, but there is a large Iranian-American community that plays an active role in the policy debate as journalists, analysts, and scholars. While many of them are not sympathetic to the Iranian regime, they try to portray a positive image of Iran’s culture and people. Saudi Arabia is disadvantaged by the fact that it doesn’t have a large diaspora community and there is not a visible Saudi presence in Western media.
https://nikitamalik.com/
Of Iran’s regional ambitions, he says, the Islamic Republic’s underlying aims have long been consistent, but its strategy for achieving those objectives is flexible. However, rampant sectarianism and antipathy toward Iran in the Sunni Arab world represent obstacles to its ambitions. Iran may help win the war in Syria, Sadjadpour predicts, but it cannot win the peace.
Fulcrum of reality:
Iran doesn’t employ public relations agencies, but there is a large Iranian-American community that plays an active role in the policy debate as journalists, analysts, and scholars. While many of them are not sympathetic to the Iranian regime, they try to portray a positive image of Iran’s culture and people. Saudi Arabia is disadvantaged by the fact that it doesn’t have a large diaspora community and there is not a visible Saudi presence in Western media.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 2 guests