https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-03- ... -15-charts tyler
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LndCI6aHwC8
Financial topics
Re: Financial topics
"They have been able to settle every one of these lawsuits behind closed doors so that there are no public records of these details."
Not true. We did what had to be done. The Federal Judge agreed.
The warrants were exercised.
Mustard seeds exist.
case 3-02cv-0282-p
never piss on us and call it rain
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xxgRUyzgs0
Not true. We did what had to be done. The Federal Judge agreed.
The warrants were exercised.
Mustard seeds exist.
case 3-02cv-0282-p
never piss on us and call it rain
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xxgRUyzgs0
Re: Financial topics
8 chan, No coms. Try to keep up.
There is no collusion, except with Hillary. Cohen even proved that last week. No collusion. And by the way, collusion is not a crime in politics, only in financial matters of which there was none. Pro Tip goog quarterback.
However, Hillary took $145,600,000 from Russia for our uranium. That is both collusion and treason. She paid the fake dossier,
over $12M to get Trump. That is treason, sedition, and collusion.
Try to keep up. You are embarrassing the ignorant.
JANUARY 2004 After the Newsday report, Senator Charles Schumer (Democrat, New York) fired off a letter to Robert Mueller, the F.B.I. director. Still, the story seemed to gain little traction until, on September 27, it emerged—via another leak—that the
Justice Department’s counter-espionage chief, John Dion, was conducting a criminal investigation into the episode.
Wilson says, “The longer it appears there’s no obvious progress, the less credible it becomes, and the more it plays into the hands of those who believe an independent counsel will be necessary to get to the bottom of this. It’s appalling to me that somebody who, for their own political reasons, would see fit to compromise national security could, close to six months after that date, still be in a position of trust in the U.S. government.… What strikes me is that so few Republicans are prepared to speak up on an issue of national-security concern.”
The Democrats prove every day they are only Flagellants and assassins of the viable .
There is no collusion, except with Hillary. Cohen even proved that last week. No collusion. And by the way, collusion is not a crime in politics, only in financial matters of which there was none. Pro Tip goog quarterback.
However, Hillary took $145,600,000 from Russia for our uranium. That is both collusion and treason. She paid the fake dossier,
over $12M to get Trump. That is treason, sedition, and collusion.
Try to keep up. You are embarrassing the ignorant.
JANUARY 2004 After the Newsday report, Senator Charles Schumer (Democrat, New York) fired off a letter to Robert Mueller, the F.B.I. director. Still, the story seemed to gain little traction until, on September 27, it emerged—via another leak—that the
Justice Department’s counter-espionage chief, John Dion, was conducting a criminal investigation into the episode.
Wilson says, “The longer it appears there’s no obvious progress, the less credible it becomes, and the more it plays into the hands of those who believe an independent counsel will be necessary to get to the bottom of this. It’s appalling to me that somebody who, for their own political reasons, would see fit to compromise national security could, close to six months after that date, still be in a position of trust in the U.S. government.… What strikes me is that so few Republicans are prepared to speak up on an issue of national-security concern.”
The Democrats prove every day they are only Flagellants and assassins of the viable .
Re: Financial topics
Lula da Silva was sentenced to nine years and six months in prison last year after being accused of receiving more than $1m in bribes from construction giant OAS.
An appeals court in January upheld corruption and money-laundering convictions against the 72-year-old. His sentence was extended to 12 years and he was barred from running.
Lula unsuccessfully applied to the Supreme Court for habeas corpus, hoping they would allow him to remain out of prison during his appeals against the decision. He is now expected to be imprisoned within days, leaving Brazilians divided.
Several of Brazil's elite have been ensnared by Operation Car Wash, a huge investigation into a bribes-and-kickbacks network that has shaken the country's political establishment and cost it more than $40bn.
Led by a small group of idealistic, young Brazilian prosecutors and a crusading judge, the investigation has exposed a vast international web of corruption involving business leaders and their efforts to bribe politicians to win contracts.
2/07/19 5:49pm
During yesterday's Oversight Committee hearing on H.R. 1, the Democrats' ethics bill, Rep. Ocasio-Cortez used her time to demonstrate how our current lax campaign finance and ethics laws corrupt our government.
Telling the witnesses they were going to play a "lightning round game," AOC told them that for purposes of her questions, she would be the "bad guy."
"I want to get away with as much (sic) bad things as possible ideally to enrich myself and advance my interest, putting myself ahead of the American people," she told them. "I also enlisted all of you as my co-conspirators so you will help me legally get away with this."
First question: "So I want to run if I want to run a campaign that is entirely funded by corporate political action committees can anything prevent me from doing that?"
Answer: "No."
Second question: "If I am a really, really bad guy and there are skeletons in my closet that I need to cover up so I can get elected -- Mr. [Bradley] Smith you wrote this opinion piece for The Washington Post entitled "These payments to women were unseemly but that does not mean they were illegal?"
Answer: "I assume that's right."
Her response: "So green light for hush money, I can do all sorts of total terrible things is totally legal right now for me to pay people off and that is considered speech. That money is considered speech."
Third question: "So I use my special interest dark money funded campaign to pay off those that I need to pay off. So now I'm elected, now I am in, I have the power to draft, lobby and shape the laws that govern the United States of America. Fabulous. Is there any hard limit that I have for what legislation I'm allowed to touch, any limits on the laws I could write, especially based on the special interest money I accepted to finance my campaign?"
Answer: "There is none."
https://crooksandliars.com/2019/02/aoc- ... s-campaign
An appeals court in January upheld corruption and money-laundering convictions against the 72-year-old. His sentence was extended to 12 years and he was barred from running.
Lula unsuccessfully applied to the Supreme Court for habeas corpus, hoping they would allow him to remain out of prison during his appeals against the decision. He is now expected to be imprisoned within days, leaving Brazilians divided.
Several of Brazil's elite have been ensnared by Operation Car Wash, a huge investigation into a bribes-and-kickbacks network that has shaken the country's political establishment and cost it more than $40bn.
Led by a small group of idealistic, young Brazilian prosecutors and a crusading judge, the investigation has exposed a vast international web of corruption involving business leaders and their efforts to bribe politicians to win contracts.
2/07/19 5:49pm
During yesterday's Oversight Committee hearing on H.R. 1, the Democrats' ethics bill, Rep. Ocasio-Cortez used her time to demonstrate how our current lax campaign finance and ethics laws corrupt our government.
Telling the witnesses they were going to play a "lightning round game," AOC told them that for purposes of her questions, she would be the "bad guy."
"I want to get away with as much (sic) bad things as possible ideally to enrich myself and advance my interest, putting myself ahead of the American people," she told them. "I also enlisted all of you as my co-conspirators so you will help me legally get away with this."
First question: "So I want to run if I want to run a campaign that is entirely funded by corporate political action committees can anything prevent me from doing that?"
Answer: "No."
Second question: "If I am a really, really bad guy and there are skeletons in my closet that I need to cover up so I can get elected -- Mr. [Bradley] Smith you wrote this opinion piece for The Washington Post entitled "These payments to women were unseemly but that does not mean they were illegal?"
Answer: "I assume that's right."
Her response: "So green light for hush money, I can do all sorts of total terrible things is totally legal right now for me to pay people off and that is considered speech. That money is considered speech."
Third question: "So I use my special interest dark money funded campaign to pay off those that I need to pay off. So now I'm elected, now I am in, I have the power to draft, lobby and shape the laws that govern the United States of America. Fabulous. Is there any hard limit that I have for what legislation I'm allowed to touch, any limits on the laws I could write, especially based on the special interest money I accepted to finance my campaign?"
Answer: "There is none."
https://crooksandliars.com/2019/02/aoc- ... s-campaign
Re: Financial topics
New to the top 10 list of moving out is our State.
The carbon tax to to be imposed and blue island infiltration is spreading
like the meaningless rhetoric that we will meet you in the middle.
Truman was right about this mentality.
thread: A documentary film, Under a False Identity, by the journalist Zvi Yehezkeli
The carbon tax to to be imposed and blue island infiltration is spreading
like the meaningless rhetoric that we will meet you in the middle.
Truman was right about this mentality.
thread: A documentary film, Under a False Identity, by the journalist Zvi Yehezkeli
Re: Financial topics
https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/soci ... ati_0a.htm
Many of the early liberals were believers in a laisez faire approach to economics, ie if governments kept their hands off the market would run in such a way as to ensure long term justice. Monetarism is a modern heir of this view and it is the ideology espoused by right wing politicians and giant media corporations, although as we know the practice is often not free or hands off!
Weishaupt comes from the other end of the post enlightenment political spectrum. He has been described as a socialist (in The Occult Conspiracy) and an anarchist (by Eco) but both these terms are anachronistic since neither of these ideologies emerged until the mid-nineteenth century. None the less he does belong in the libertarian tradition from which these later movements would evolve, a tradition which, curiously enough is sometimes seen as originating from Gerald Winstanley who also allegedly replaces the concept of a transcendent God with that of immanent reason (see Woodcock’s Anarchism).
Weishaupt’s aspirations seem to have been twofold firstly to abolish belief in the Christian God and secondly to establish a libertarian republic. He sees these two running together because he takes the view, held by many at that time, that once you abolish belief in the Christian God man’s natural goodness will flourish (cf eg Rousseau). In some ways his ideology is similar to that of Bakunin Proudhon and Marx who share this view that religion is a barrier to social progress.
But these later writers are looking back on the failure of the first French Republic and asking what went wrong, both forms of socialism (Marxism and anarchism) are, as well as being a reaction to the emergence of industrialism, an attempt to answer this question. For Weishaupt the enemy is the existing social hierarchy, the aristocracy, which must be overthrown in order to create the free republic.
https://www.abebooks.com/servlet/Search ... p-_-author
France will not exist 20 years. Given our trajectory and derivatives market inertia since the Federal Lawsuit they never seen the obvious
fx recycle shift either.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_Qpy0mXg8Y
contractors: http://gdxforum.com/forum/search.php?ke ... sf=msgonly
https://www.judicialwatch.org/bulletins ... lix-sater/
https://realconservativesunite.com/2018 ... iled-deal/
We already know the blowback centers internal and externalized.
Perfidious Albion gets a free pass again.
http://gdxforum.com/forum/search.php?ke ... sf=msgonly
http://gdxforum.com/forum/search.php?ke ... sf=msgonly
Many of the early liberals were believers in a laisez faire approach to economics, ie if governments kept their hands off the market would run in such a way as to ensure long term justice. Monetarism is a modern heir of this view and it is the ideology espoused by right wing politicians and giant media corporations, although as we know the practice is often not free or hands off!
Weishaupt comes from the other end of the post enlightenment political spectrum. He has been described as a socialist (in The Occult Conspiracy) and an anarchist (by Eco) but both these terms are anachronistic since neither of these ideologies emerged until the mid-nineteenth century. None the less he does belong in the libertarian tradition from which these later movements would evolve, a tradition which, curiously enough is sometimes seen as originating from Gerald Winstanley who also allegedly replaces the concept of a transcendent God with that of immanent reason (see Woodcock’s Anarchism).
Weishaupt’s aspirations seem to have been twofold firstly to abolish belief in the Christian God and secondly to establish a libertarian republic. He sees these two running together because he takes the view, held by many at that time, that once you abolish belief in the Christian God man’s natural goodness will flourish (cf eg Rousseau). In some ways his ideology is similar to that of Bakunin Proudhon and Marx who share this view that religion is a barrier to social progress.
But these later writers are looking back on the failure of the first French Republic and asking what went wrong, both forms of socialism (Marxism and anarchism) are, as well as being a reaction to the emergence of industrialism, an attempt to answer this question. For Weishaupt the enemy is the existing social hierarchy, the aristocracy, which must be overthrown in order to create the free republic.
https://www.abebooks.com/servlet/Search ... p-_-author
France will not exist 20 years. Given our trajectory and derivatives market inertia since the Federal Lawsuit they never seen the obvious
fx recycle shift either.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_Qpy0mXg8Y
contractors: http://gdxforum.com/forum/search.php?ke ... sf=msgonly
https://www.judicialwatch.org/bulletins ... lix-sater/
https://realconservativesunite.com/2018 ... iled-deal/
We already know the blowback centers internal and externalized.
Perfidious Albion gets a free pass again.
http://gdxforum.com/forum/search.php?ke ... sf=msgonly
http://gdxforum.com/forum/search.php?ke ... sf=msgonly
Re: Financial topics
filter
the first three moves, except
that if it was the only one to cooperate on the first move and the only one
to defect on the second move, it defects on the third move. After the
third move, its choice is determined from the 3 preceding outcomes in the
following manner.
.. math:: A = 16 a_1 + 4 a_2 + a_3
Where :math:`a_i` is dependent on the outcome of the previous :math:`i` th
round. If both strategies defect, :math:`a_i=3`, if the opponent only defects:
:math:`a_i=2` and finally if it is only this strategy that defects then
:math:`a_i=1`.
Finally this strategy defects if and only if:.. math:: A \in \{1, 6, 7, 17, 22, 23, 26, 29, 30, 31, 33, 38, 39, 45, 49, 54, 55, 58, 61\}
Thus if all three preceding moves are mutual defection, A = 63 and the rule
cooperates. This rule was designed for appeared to be trustworthy, potentially
cooperative, but not gullible.
After the third move, its choice is determined from the 3 preceding outcomes in the following manner.
aoc already failed
https://mobile.twitter.com/DemSocialists
https://mobile.twitter.com/DSA_Enviro/s ... 81/photo/1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JLAaUvsKljc frogs and the fourth wall
http://gdxforum.com/forum/search.php?ke ... sf=msgonly
Justified corruption in their logic they adulterate the taxpayer.
Your being gamed. They have no problem taking 880000.00
Just as we confirmed earlier in nash game dilema
The disconnect is never an accident.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/14Nb ... i8IdQ/edit
https://climatejusticealliance.org/gree ... te-change/
https://twitter.com/LynnePatton cnn got called out as the organization they truly are.....
Land of the Pliant Ones in a narrative they never followed as we dated it.
https://www.marxists.org/archive/selected-marxists.htm
Slowly the reader understand than the conception was born how a nomenclature of all reflexions and means issues or doubts about a government. Sat Dec 07, 2013 3:10 am
“If it is true that parties are only the nomenclature for classes, it is also true that parties are not simply a mechanical and passive expression of those classes, but react energetically upon them in order to develop, solidify and universalize them.”
Antonio Gramsci (1891-1937) Italian Communist Party. Arrested in 1926 for his revolutionary activities and sentenced by a fascist court to 20 years imprisonment. Theorized key concepts such as hegemony, base and superstructure, organic intellectuals, and war of position.
dialectical materialism
the first three moves, except
that if it was the only one to cooperate on the first move and the only one
to defect on the second move, it defects on the third move. After the
third move, its choice is determined from the 3 preceding outcomes in the
following manner.
.. math:: A = 16 a_1 + 4 a_2 + a_3
Where :math:`a_i` is dependent on the outcome of the previous :math:`i` th
round. If both strategies defect, :math:`a_i=3`, if the opponent only defects:
:math:`a_i=2` and finally if it is only this strategy that defects then
:math:`a_i=1`.
Finally this strategy defects if and only if:.. math:: A \in \{1, 6, 7, 17, 22, 23, 26, 29, 30, 31, 33, 38, 39, 45, 49, 54, 55, 58, 61\}
Thus if all three preceding moves are mutual defection, A = 63 and the rule
cooperates. This rule was designed for appeared to be trustworthy, potentially
cooperative, but not gullible.
After the third move, its choice is determined from the 3 preceding outcomes in the following manner.
aoc already failed
https://mobile.twitter.com/DemSocialists
https://mobile.twitter.com/DSA_Enviro/s ... 81/photo/1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JLAaUvsKljc frogs and the fourth wall
http://gdxforum.com/forum/search.php?ke ... sf=msgonly
Justified corruption in their logic they adulterate the taxpayer.
Your being gamed. They have no problem taking 880000.00
Just as we confirmed earlier in nash game dilema
The disconnect is never an accident.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/14Nb ... i8IdQ/edit
https://climatejusticealliance.org/gree ... te-change/
https://twitter.com/LynnePatton cnn got called out as the organization they truly are.....
Land of the Pliant Ones in a narrative they never followed as we dated it.
https://www.marxists.org/archive/selected-marxists.htm
Slowly the reader understand than the conception was born how a nomenclature of all reflexions and means issues or doubts about a government. Sat Dec 07, 2013 3:10 am
“If it is true that parties are only the nomenclature for classes, it is also true that parties are not simply a mechanical and passive expression of those classes, but react energetically upon them in order to develop, solidify and universalize them.”
Antonio Gramsci (1891-1937) Italian Communist Party. Arrested in 1926 for his revolutionary activities and sentenced by a fascist court to 20 years imprisonment. Theorized key concepts such as hegemony, base and superstructure, organic intellectuals, and war of position.
dialectical materialism
Re: Financial topics
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-03- ... et-barking
They will fall like leave and still will not listen.
over 80,000 dead and we set armed watch so they could sleep
and they still insult us.
They will fall like leave and still will not listen.
over 80,000 dead and we set armed watch so they could sleep
and they still insult us.
Re: Financial topics
Tue Jul 18, 2017 12:30 pm
Intersectionality is a term coined by American civil rights advocate Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw to describe overlapping or intersecting social identities.
Actually it is from the Frankfurt School of Cultural Marxism of Felix Weil.
Tue, Mar 5 4:54 PM EST The tribe is trotting it out.
Democrats face a similar dilemma. Driven by their dominant academic and media “thought police,” any shift to the middle on issues like crime, climate change or regulation now seems unimaginable. 2016
The point remains the democrats will have to refill the body farm since using a bulldozer to cover the last forensic point still did not
factor into the run back to middle and they always eat their own at the budget table since we indeed read that playbook also
as the Dorians and Ionians.
“The research operation is very high-tech. When I got here a few years ago the budget was $3,000. Today it’s like a million and a half, or more. Probably it’s 2 million at this point. I don’t even know, it’s huge. It’s a massive budget.” He and his colleagues are keen to stay invisible: “We do it securely and anonymously. That’s the key.”
It would be hard to do it through political debate. Since the failure of the 1993 Oslo accords.
Intersectionality is a term coined by American civil rights advocate Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw to describe overlapping or intersecting social identities.
Actually it is from the Frankfurt School of Cultural Marxism of Felix Weil.
Tue, Mar 5 4:54 PM EST The tribe is trotting it out.
Democrats face a similar dilemma. Driven by their dominant academic and media “thought police,” any shift to the middle on issues like crime, climate change or regulation now seems unimaginable. 2016
The point remains the democrats will have to refill the body farm since using a bulldozer to cover the last forensic point still did not
factor into the run back to middle and they always eat their own at the budget table since we indeed read that playbook also
as the Dorians and Ionians.
“The research operation is very high-tech. When I got here a few years ago the budget was $3,000. Today it’s like a million and a half, or more. Probably it’s 2 million at this point. I don’t even know, it’s huge. It’s a massive budget.” He and his colleagues are keen to stay invisible: “We do it securely and anonymously. That’s the key.”
It would be hard to do it through political debate. Since the failure of the 1993 Oslo accords.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 4 guests