The Elephant In the Room
OK, let’s (finally) address the elephant in the room, which is that the most significant cause (but not the only) of unprecedented and sudden rises in infectious illnesses around the world is the likelihood that the planet’s citizens are suffering from widespread immune dysregulation in the wake of the global mRNA vaccination campaign. There, I said it.
At least, that’s my hypothesis. Part of the evidence I will use to support this assertion comes straight from the article (in a surprising twist, the explanation was literally right under their noses yet they couldn’t sniff it out). Check out the following paragraphs which, to me, are unintentionally comical:
The Biggest Risk: Canada, Japan, Singapore and Germany — places lauded for their successful efforts to contain Covid — are now seeing unusual levels of excess mortality, said Christopher Murray, Washington-based director of the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation.
“Lauded for their successful efforts to contain Covid?” Meaning.. mass mandated vaccination? And, lo and behold, they are now seeing “unusual levels of excess mortality?” Weird, right? Seems to support my “vaccine hypothesis” above no? With one caveat - although in this article I will focus on the negative immunological impacts of vaccines, I would argue that the excess mortality they cite above is more from the cardiovascular and endothelial damage of the mRNA spike vaccines. This can be seen in the data showing that during the pandemic, there were significant increases in strokes, heart attacks, and sudden deaths, especially in young people. Associated with a respiratory virus. Go figure.
Surprisingly, they make the vaccine hypothesis even stronger with the next sentence:
“In contrast, places that failed to control the spread of Covid, like Bulgaria, Romania and Russia, are now back to pre-pandemic mortality rates.”
Murray then makes a lame attempt to explain this seeming contradiction:
Why would it be worse in places that did a good job? That seems a bit strange. (ED: not really Doug). Some of this is the idea that those countries kept frail, elderly people alive,” Murray said. Mixed with the immunity debt theory, “it’s a really quite complicated set of things going on,” he said.
You have just got to be kidding me here. They are making my argument for me. Doesn’t happen often, but I’ll take it. Yeesh.
So, their best explanation is that the “best performing countries” in Covid (an oxymoron, obviously) managed to keep the frail elderly alive longer, and that is why we are seeing new excess mortality. “Mortality debt?” Hmm. Good one.
Not-So-Fun Facts About Vaccination and Immune Dysregulation
So, in the above list of “differential diagnoses” generated to explain the surges in illness, the Bloomberg journalists never entertained the possibility that the negative immunological consequences of mass vaccination with an experimental gene technology might be a cause. Oddly, they didn’t even explore the less politically charged (and much more obvious) possibility that patients who recover from Covid-19 itself can exhibit alterations in immune function.
Let’s start with vaccines. A little-known fact is that vaccines, even when they reduce the rate of the targeted infection, are also known to simultaneously increase the risk of other respiratory infections (thus creating a zero- and/or negative-sum game). Don’t believe me? Here ya go (heading is hyperlinked to the study):
Randomized Controlled Trial in Children (2012, Hong Kong):
Flu-vaccinated kids had over 4X the risk of non-influenza respiratory virus infection (rhinoviruses, coxsackie, echoviruses).
Australian Case-Control Study in Children:
Seasonal flu shots doubled the risk of illness from non-influenza virus infections. Overall, the vaccine increased the risk of virus-associated acute respiratory illness by 73%.
In this study comparing VA clinics that mandated flu vaccines to those that did not, even though flu infections decreased markedly, other respiratory infections increased by 26%.
Mechanisms Supporting Immune Dysregulation Caused by mRNA Gene Therapies
Recall that the spike protein is the primary pathogenic factor of the virus. The spike protein generated by mRNA vaccination has been shown to lead to the following immunologic disturbances (headings are hyperlinked to the study). The spike protein:
1. Induces High IgG4 Antibody Levels which promote an immune environment less focused on pathogen elimination.
2. Impairs T Cell Activation which are critical for fighting a broad range of infections
3. Suppresses Innate Immune Responses which is essential for the initial defense against many pathogens
4.Causes inflammation - spike protein triggers both increased inflammatory signals or molecular mimicry, leading to immune dysregulation and autoimmunity.
Spikeopathy
This review by Parry et al (a respected Australian psychiatrist and colleague whose scholarly work exposed numerous research integrity problems in SSRI trials) first coined and described the field of "spikeopathy." The term is used to describe the collection of autoimmune, cardiovascular, neurological, and possible oncological impacts linked to the spike protein, which they expertly and comprehensively detailed in their review.
Mechanisms include inflammation, autoimmunity, altered immune responses, and widespread biodistribution of the spike protein along with cross-reactive responses - antibodies generated by mRNA vaccines can cross-react with other pathogens, which could, in theory, also distract or suppress the immune response to other organisms.
The “Inconvenient Science” Problem: How Medical Literature Gets Neutered
What could be more inconvenient to the vaccine industry than the knowledge that vaccination might, paradoxically, actually lead to an overall increase in infectious illnesses? Nothing could be more threatening, really (well, except for the knowledge they cause death I suppose) - which is why Bloomberg carefully (or ignorantly) avoided exploring the possibility.
My readers are, by now, all well aware that when “inconvenient science” emerges, “disinformation campaigns” are deployed via peer-reviewed studies in medical journals, which are then amplified by the media to suppress or neutralize the findings. Whenever a scientific finding threatens entrenched financial interests—or doesn’t fit the preferred narrative—you can bet a flurry of “debunking” studies will follow, with designs engineered to neutralize the original results. All the “other side” has to do is publish conflicting or contradictory data to render the previous finding “controversial, conflicting, and/or inconclusive.” Easy Peezy.
I have hammered this concept home repeatedly in this Substack and my book called “The War on Ivermectin.” Note that the Hong Kong study I cited above was a prospective RCT, published in 2012, which found that kids who got the flu vaccine had a 4X increased rate of other viral illnesses compared to those who didn’t. 4X.