War will stop when Mommies can't get the addled kids to school as Classical Annihilation ends you
and yes Pharmakeia is as real as the stupidity that will continue to enable and alleged to think Coke or Pepsi Polo-Tics.
More will start to contend full term murder of the Innocents is nothing new under the Sun.
Blame the Amish as they back fill the stupidity as they must seek lower Tax districts to feed your
useless idiots as the Corporates will just do what is already known.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1KS9hh1dfk
Financial Topics avec aeden
Re: Financial Topics avec aeden
That's fair.
I only saw search excerpts, not the full document. Let me open it and read it properly.
Debt is a fair lens that I haven't covered yet,
so let me get current numbers instead of speaking in generalities....
The idea itself is worth taking seriously, and it has real support, though it's contested.
The parts of the 1930s record most economists agree on:
Tightening into weakness. The gold standard forced deflationary policy on many countries, and in 1936-37 the Fed doubled bank reserve requirements while fiscal policy tightened, contributing to the 1937-38 recession.
Tariffs. Smoot-Hawley in 1930 was followed by retaliation and a collapse in trade. Most economists think it worsened the Depression but wasn't its main cause.
Debt and banking fragility. The slow response to bank failures turned a downturn into a catastrophe.
Some people see echoes today: tariffs, a rate hike during an energy shock, and heavy debt. There are also large differences that make "a renewing failure map" too strong a claim. The gold standard is gone, and the Fed and Treasury acted forcefully in 2008 and 2020 to prevent bank runs and a collapse in the money supply, which is the specific mistake of the early 1930s. Today's problem is inflation of around 3.7%, not deflation. And the Fed's unanimous hike can be read as acting on risk, not ignoring it, though critics argue that hiking during a supply shock risks a 1937-style overcorrection.
It cannot parse intent since it has no snow shovel to dig.
The comment none is to many in sum is lost on level 2 and 3 maps.
To claim intent, you'd still need evidence of coordination.
The Office refuses to negate activist Judges to duty.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ek0SgwWmF9w
I only saw search excerpts, not the full document. Let me open it and read it properly.
Debt is a fair lens that I haven't covered yet,
so let me get current numbers instead of speaking in generalities....
The idea itself is worth taking seriously, and it has real support, though it's contested.
The parts of the 1930s record most economists agree on:
Tightening into weakness. The gold standard forced deflationary policy on many countries, and in 1936-37 the Fed doubled bank reserve requirements while fiscal policy tightened, contributing to the 1937-38 recession.
Tariffs. Smoot-Hawley in 1930 was followed by retaliation and a collapse in trade. Most economists think it worsened the Depression but wasn't its main cause.
Debt and banking fragility. The slow response to bank failures turned a downturn into a catastrophe.
Some people see echoes today: tariffs, a rate hike during an energy shock, and heavy debt. There are also large differences that make "a renewing failure map" too strong a claim. The gold standard is gone, and the Fed and Treasury acted forcefully in 2008 and 2020 to prevent bank runs and a collapse in the money supply, which is the specific mistake of the early 1930s. Today's problem is inflation of around 3.7%, not deflation. And the Fed's unanimous hike can be read as acting on risk, not ignoring it, though critics argue that hiking during a supply shock risks a 1937-style overcorrection.
It cannot parse intent since it has no snow shovel to dig.
The comment none is to many in sum is lost on level 2 and 3 maps.
To claim intent, you'd still need evidence of coordination.
The Office refuses to negate activist Judges to duty.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ek0SgwWmF9w
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests