Last fall:
Imagine two neighbors. Both are unemployed, yet neither are worried about it at the moment. One neighbor has a stash
of gold coins. The other has a FICO score
of 800. One has equity, the other has credit. For the time being they can each live on what they have. Eventually both will have to get a job, but hopefully you can see the difference.
Now we have the situation the Austrian School is most afraid
of since the government’s attempts to avoid readjustments from an asset bubble have simply prolonged the concurrent bubbles and made the potential fall worse. We have some time since the dimes are cashing in on the nickels housing contracts. In our area alone a $68k went for $11k cash 68:11*X Another was $160k default for $30k cash. The average time spread I am seeing is ~5.5X this year for the sake
of argument. I did not bite this round, the taxpayer took it in the…. which is absurd going into the next round
of resets soon, and the dimes are walking along gathering nickels in a easily pace, since the risk is speculation funded now, built in on subordinate debt tranches
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subordinated_debt on Tax Payers Back Ad infinitum
Back
of the envelope in pencil.
The CPI is used to calculate how prices have changed over the years. Let's say you have $28K in your pocket to purchase some goods and services today. How much money would you have needed in X to buy the same amount
of goods and services?
The CPI for 1982 = 96.5
The CPI for 2009 = 213.2
Use the following formula to compute the calculation:
1982 Price = 2009 Price x (1982 CPI / 2009 CPI*)
X (96.5 /214)
I used 214 since there number really is no better than any other for margin puts.
28k*(96.5/214) = $11000 /$62157 5.6 versus 5.5 observed, close enough I say for now.
I had to go back to ~1982 dollars for our regional context today. That is a lot
of nickels with no risk to the dimes. Who have many contracts built on
http://www.markit.com/en/products/data/ ... icing.page?
that are out there if you like it or not. Rinse and repeat and this dime will wait until correlation trend observed uptick. As I told my wife it is worth what you will pay for it in our current economy based on what we do make? They sits vacant on a lovely balance sheet with what value. Pick one…. I wait, and will wait until the adults can get back to business.
http://www.physics.utoronto.ca/~qocmp/i ... .10.05.pdf
Why should the American taxpayer, at the behest
of Senators like you, bail out those Wall Street bankers who have levered themselves beyond comprehension through complex financial instruments like naked CDOs, MBS, and credit default swaps, i.e., derivatives?
Currency peg will shift since both the parents die and the baby starves....
Thu Nov 12, 2009 7:18 pm
freddyv wrote:
An interesting article on "shadow inventory"
of housing and other housing-related topics.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/33834317
I find myself learning great patience. Just sitting here waiting for the pot to boil. As we all know, it will not boil if watched and so I am quietly listening for the bubbling sound.... --Fred
Ah the love
of money and we define avarice as a process given the vice it contains worthy
of one course since it contains demise.
No unpopular Government will last in the long run as they "insure" there own winter on the people. Those trying to make are innovating as we are
but there is so much headwinds and noise even when doing things better politics distort fact. Internal wrecking ball and they wonder what the hell just hit us.
The apathy top to bottum will give way to humilty before the last crash it appears as was the last event we remember in the 70's we had to tough out.
Pointless from here on to convey there ass kicking and misery to come. They never learn... but must suffer.
Sun Nov 15, 2009
I was early out equity as posted until spring now as conveyed earlier.
Assume a move coming from hubris and not fundamantal's. Do not know on convexity correlation but it was factored in
as was conveyed in forums on risk management. More fundamantal pressure coming to actual jobs that are value added
to capacity and demand given polital inertia which is another layer
of malinvest the British endure since the climate is votes
to a party line from manufacturing to Bureacratic centric mentality.
http://generationaldynamics.com/forum/v ... dens#p4359
Local: Seen that the brits saw the light, but wish our cousins well well, and PEG float was announced as China loosened float finally in there terms
given there realities.
http://generationaldynamics.com/forum/v ... dens#p4350
As we know watch the usual suspects.
http://generationaldynamics.com/forum/v ... 2140#p4361
Stocks and interest rates fell sharply Thursday as investors grew more pessimistic about the economic recovery. Reports on initial jobless claims and durable goods orders contributed to investors' darker view
of the economy.
Rates on 30-year fixed mortgages fall to 4.69 pct., lowest level on records dating to 1971 <----------- It will not matter as discussed in Forums.
In thus altering the configuration
of income distribution in favor
of taxpayers and to the disadvantage
of political tax consumers, the rabattage effect
of fiscal deflation results in a new structure
of consumer demands and pattern
of resource pricing and allocation that more accurately reflect the preferences
of those who earn income from the production and exchange
of goods on the market. From the standpoint
of Austrian welfare economics this result represents an improvement in social welfare and economic efficiency because, even if the precise pre-tax pattern
of income and wealth distribution is
not restored, fewer resources are siphoned off from producers in the social division
of labor mitigating the distortion
of economic calculation inherent in all government activities.
"The case that all government expenditures introduce calculational chaos and economic inefficiencies into
the market process is elaborated in Rothbard 1970, pp. 125-49. See Salerno 1993, pp. 130-31 for the
argument that the “preferences and demands”
of the participants in the social
division of labor “must serve
as the sole and ultimate standard
of socially efficient resource use” and that the market demands
of tax
consumers falsify monetary calculation and lead to “a socially inefficient reallocation
of productive
resources.”
This deflationary process effectively involves the extinguishing
of pseudo property titles to the money
commodity, in this case the paper currency embodying the fiat dollar. As argued above,
the suppression
of fictitious property titles to any commodity ends the distortion
of
economic calculation and realigns the pattern
of productive activities with actual
underlying resource scarcities.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/06/2 ... 24096.html