Script: The “nightmare scenario” for inflation starts with growth much poorer than the administration’s forecasts, possibly due to larger government distortions and higher tax rates. Lower growth is the single most important danger to the Federal budget. Then, the government may have to make good on its many credit guarantees, and continue its string
of bailouts. If this happens, prospective deficit to GDP ratios will rise much further than current projections suggest. When investors see that path coming, they will quite suddenly bail out
of the dollar; we will see a dramatic rise in interest rates, a fall
of the dollar, and large inflation — and quite possibly “stagflation” not inflation associated with a boom.
http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/john.co ... nceton.pdf
===========================================================================
Higgenbotham
The Fed can't guarantee any
of this mess. Once investors get nervous about what the Fed can and can't do, at some point the credit and stock markets will panic. I'm guessing August on that, but who knows.
============================================================================
Dollar: In this analysis, we can read the government’s actions as a much modified version
of Friedman and Schwartz’s advice for the great depression. In that event, the Fed failed to accommodate a demand for money at the expense
of government debt. In this one the government recognized and accommodated a massive demand for both money and government debt at the expense
of private debt.
Current: Conveyance
of Gold EU tonnage sales. History does convey that Currency is the true safety valve to relive economic stress.
http://www.reuters.com/article/wtMostRe ... dChannel=0
It was plain to the eye who seen what and when to debt stabilization. Namely influx basket currencys.
http://dallasfed.org/research/eclett/2009/el0904.html
Taming the Credit Cycle by Limiting High-Risk Lending by Jeffery W. Gunther
This as a taxpayer simply put is the problem and why they should follow the debt to logical conclusion
of timely terminations from the top down hence the true reform ensues. Given the extent to avarice they will never let it be so in the vein
of atypical Syndicalism stays veiled from public discernment and will be rendered for purpose
of Capital and Labor Responsibilities systemic misnomers. The encyclical Quaddragesimo anno 1931 contained passages which could but need not to date be interpreted as an endorsement
of corporativism. The relevance to be seen is in a historical context
of view is then it only lasted a few years and will be a simple addition to human action
of governance expediencies to delay proper supply chain metrics. Minsky elaborated to the capital management ideologues and precursors
of fund capital movements.
Most
of the Administration’s defense
of fiscal stimulus (For example Bernstein and Romer 2009) cites simple Keynesian flow multipliers, not the sort
of fiscal-monetary inflation I have described as “stimulus.” And by May, these simple positive multipliers turned in to a widespread worry about fiscal sustainability and can be read as dramatically negative multipliers. For example, the CEA’s (2009) analysis
of the Administration health proposal states that “slowing the growth rate
of health care costs will prevent disastrous increases in the Federal budget deficit” and will raise the level
of GDP by 8%, permanently. Secretary Geithner went out
of his way to assure the Chinese that the dollar will not be inflated (Cha 2009). In sum, government statements do not paint a clear picture. This may reflect an understandable indecision on the part
of the government facing a Catch-22: In this analysis, the only way to “stimulate” is to commit forcefully and credibly to an unsustainable fiscal path, so that people will try to get rid
of all their government debt including money, and in so doing drive up demand for goods, services, and real assets. But the government clearly understands that such an action trades modest stimulus today for financial and economic chaos when the inflation really comes. Faced with that stark decision, it is not surprising that the government settles for half-measures, wishful thinking and contradictory statements — as the Japanese were accused
of doing for a decade. Insert debt to GDP ratio here to the G-20 over 30 years.
Net result:
http://www.piie.com/publications/pb/pb09-10.pdf
What is clear, however, is that after the highly appropriate effective appreciation, it is important that China changes its peg from the dollar to a basket to stabilize the effective rate.
A fundamental equilibrium exchange rate (FEER) is defined as an exchange rate that is expected to be indefinitely sustainable on the basis
of existing policies. It should therefore be one that is expected to generate a current account surplus or deficit that matches the country’s underlying capital flow over the cycle, assuming that the country is pursuing internal balance as well as it can and that it is not restricting trade for balance
of-payments reasons.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/econ ... ollar.html
Current : Until we see another five years'
of evidence over whether China is a more consumer-driven economy, becoming bigger and bigger, and whether the euro can have a successful second decade, the dollar looks set to remain dominant." China has made some hints about loosening its hold over the yuan in recent months, but these are only early maneuvers. A second step would be to allow the yuan to become a part
of the SDR – whose own value is determined by those
of a basket
of currencies including the dollar, pound and euro.
Quo Vadis?: Laborem exercens
Thus, the principle
of the priority
of labour over capital is a postulate
of the order
of social morality. It has key importance both in the system built on the principle
of private ownership
of the means
of production and also in the system in which private ownership
of these means has been limited even in a radical way. Labour is in a sense inseparable from capital; in no way does it accept the antinomy, that is to say, the separation and opposition with regard to the means
of production that has weighed upon human life in recent centuries as a result
of merely economic premises.
Such a vision
of the values
of human work, or in other words such a spirituality
of work, fully explains what we read in the same section
of the Council's Pastoral Constitution with regard to the right meaning
of progress: "A person is more precious for what he is than for what he has. Similarly, that entire people do to obtain greater justice, wider brotherhood, and a more humane ordering
of social relationships has greater worth than technical advances. For these advances can supply the material for human progress, but
of themselves alone they can never actually bring it about".
http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_ ... en.html#-D
To separate the cause and the cure is only hindered by values which to date followed to logical conclusions do tell
of its rate
of malinvestment “oversupply” and intent in multiple terms
of true regard
of its classed inertia in time. The customer must decide who produces what and focus capital movements.
http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/leo_x ... um_en.html
To sum up, then, We may lay it down as a general and lasting law that working men's associations should be so organized and governed as to furnish the best and most suitable means for attaining what is aimed at, that is to say, for helping each individual member to better his condition to the utmost in body, soul, and property. It is clear that they must pay special and chief attention to the duties
of religion and morality, and that social betterment should have this chiefly in view; otherwise they would lose wholly their special character, and end by becoming little better than those societies which take no account whatever
of religion. The arrow
of time properly indicates who omits relevance to the common good. It has been said give to the authorities without malice since it is not the most important thing in life and I agree to the extent we must and are hidebound to hold them accountable. The differences in direction
of that arrow are no different in any time. We were clearly told what it would bring. Abraham’s seed has no excuses as in the three pillars we see today to freedom’s regard to stability. The dead letter proscribed a viable path to reason since the lack
of it is the definition
of hell.
