Re: Abortion as a universal value?
Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2022 6:42 pm
This is an incredible statement.Bob Butler wrote: ↑Wed Aug 24, 2022 1:24 pmThis leaves someone who eats meat but tries to restrict abortion on questionable ground.
Generational theory, international history and current events
https://gdxforum.com/forum/
This is an incredible statement.Bob Butler wrote: ↑Wed Aug 24, 2022 1:24 pmThis leaves someone who eats meat but tries to restrict abortion on questionable ground.
Someone who knows how please alert "Libs of TikTok" to post this.Bob Butler wrote: ↑Wed Aug 24, 2022 1:24 pmThis leaves someone who eats meat but tries to restrict abortion on questionable ground.
This confirms the Republicans decided not to join. If there was no cross, this was the Republican choice.
SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT.
There is hereby established the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol (hereinafter referred to as the “Select Committee”).
SEC. 2. COMPOSITION.
(a) Appointment Of Members.—The Speaker shall appoint 13 Members to the Select Committee, 5 of whom shall be appointed after consultation with the minority leader.
(b) Designation Of Chair.—The Speaker shall designate one Member to serve as chair of the Select Committee.
(c) Vacancies.—Any vacancy in the Select Committee shall be filled in the same manner as the original appointment.
Care to counter it? Should the government impose one culture's moral opinion on another culture? How does one draw a line of who is sentient other than by language use? Alternatives? We had a naked statement of one culture with no explanation or justification. Explanation or justification?spottybrowncow wrote: ↑Wed Aug 24, 2022 6:42 pmThis is an incredible statement.Bob Butler wrote: ↑Wed Aug 24, 2022 1:24 pmThis leaves someone who eats meat but tries to restrict abortion on questionable ground.
Here is further evidence that the "Republicans decided not to join" the committee to include their justification:Bob Butler wrote: ↑Thu Aug 25, 2022 5:02 amThis confirms the Republicans decided not to join. If there was no cross, this was the Republican choice.
Bob Butler wrote: I did find the bill that created the committee, including the procedure for membership. The Democrats did have the majority to pass the bill in question. Pelosi did control membership. The relevant section...
Thank you for providing the evidence that supports Pelosi's sole appointment authority over the selection process. Pelosi chose to exclude the voice of the Trump voters. Her choice gave Alan Dershowitz, a liberal democrat and legal expert, cause to render the following opinion:SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT.
There is hereby established the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol (hereinafter referred to as the “Select Committee”).
SEC. 2. COMPOSITION.
(a) Appointment Of Members.—The Speaker shall appoint 13 Members to the Select Committee, 5 of whom shall be appointed after consultation with the minority leader.
(b) Designation Of Chair.—The Speaker shall designate one Member to serve as chair of the Select Committee.
(c) Vacancies.—Any vacancy in the Select Committee shall be filled in the same manner as the original appointment.
The statement is not worthy of the relative dignity it would be afforded by someone arguing against it.Bob Butler wrote: ↑Thu Aug 25, 2022 5:16 amCare to counter it? Should the government impose one culture's moral opinion on another culture? How does one draw a line of who is sentient other than by language use? Alternatives? We had a naked statement of one culture with no explanation or justification. Explanation or justification?spottybrowncow wrote: ↑Wed Aug 24, 2022 6:42 pmThis is an incredible statement.Bob Butler wrote: ↑Wed Aug 24, 2022 1:24 pmThis leaves someone who eats meat but tries to restrict abortion on questionable ground.
I haven't been able to find a story of how the membership went. As I recall it, Liz Chaney and the other Republicans currently on the committee were in the initial nine. After that, the consultation with the minority leader. Five members were nominated. Three were quite acceptable, but two were such Trump followers that they would only be interested in messing up the investigation. Like, in the first impeachment trial, when the Republicans had a chance to cross, they would attack Hunter Biden to the point you would think he was the one being impeached. So, Nancy said three good, can you come up with two more?jdcpapa wrote: ↑Thu Aug 25, 2022 9:57 amThank you for providing the evidence that supports Pelosi's sole appointment authority over the selection process. Pelosi chose to exclude the voice of the Trump voters. Her choice gave Alan Dershowitz, a liberal democrat and legal expert, cause to render the following opinion:
Clueless and beyond hope could be read as they have a different worldview, values, culture. People seldom change their values as I have often commented. One needs a highly emotional event, the complete failure of the values one is moving on from. If one assumes one culture should not impose its values on another, there you go. Covered.spottybrowncow wrote: ↑Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:07 amThe statement is not worthy of the relative dignity it would be afforded by someone arguing against it.
Most people know that unborn babies are not "meat," the rest are clueless and beyond hope.
Because:Bob Butler wrote: ↑Tue Aug 23, 2022 11:29 am
You obviously haven’t been following the January 6 Committee.
Dershowitz sums it up here: "Due process for thee but not for me isn't justified," Dershowitz continued. "And therefore, I don't think that the Jan. 6 committee's report will have the kind of credibility that the 9/11 commission report, for example, had."Bob Butler wrote: ↑Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:19 amThe investigation is one sided as the evidence is one sided.