** 03-Jul-2021 World View: Bob's Perspective of the CCP
Bob Butler wrote: ↑Sat Jul 03, 2021 1:01 pm
> I have characterized the CCP under Xi Jinping as into
> brinksmanship. They will respond to any threat with bombast,
> willing to heighten tensions and induce the opponent to back down.
> To date they have not gone over the edge. They have had some
> success with their financial plots, and seemingly don’t wish to to
> trigger sanctions.
> This may not continue, but the tendency should be remembered.
> Still, any time you make it a habit of dancing on the edge, you
> run the chance of a miscalculation.
> I also ran into one report on the CCP’s status which projects
> short term trouble. The coal affair with Australia, the flooding
> in the Three Gorges area, racial troubles in Xinjiang and Tibet,
> the poor performances with the COVUS vaccines and general tensions
> about lack of human rights and democracy were projected to combine
> in a general rejection of the CCP. It sure hasn’t happened yet,
> but their projection of the next China trouble is a combined many
> factors revolt against the CCP.
> I’m not sure of this version of what is coming in China is
> accurate, but it is a possibility at least. It might provide a
> balance to the perspectives project here. The conservative
> perspective seems to be moving towards rejection worldwide, which
> has left many clinging to violent though patterns embracing
> disaster scenarios. Not clear.
I guess when you talk about the "conservative perspective" being one
of "rejection" of the CCP, you are confirming to me my impression that
the "Democrat perspective" is one of "acceptance" of the CCP.
Joe and Hunter Biden are firmly in bed with the CCP, as are the banks,
the media and the Big Tech firms that the Democrats depend on for
their Stalinist Fascist censorship regime.
Occasionally a Democrat will say that he's "troubled" by the reports
of enslavement of Uighurs, but it's obvious that they're far less
"troubled" about that than the laws being passed by several states to
prevent a repeat of the massive election fraud that occurred in
November 2020. The conclusion that I reach is that the Democrats
would like to see as much fraud in American elections as the Chinese
have in their elections.
So if the "Democrat perspective" is "acceptance" of the CCP, what does
that mean? It means "acceptance" of the Uighur enslavement,
"acceptance" of the CCP crackdowns on democracy and free press, and
"acceptance" of the CCP's claims on Taiwan.
Thursday's speech by Xi Jinping was almost insane. He has a view of
history that's entirely incorrect, and a view of the future that's
entirely delusional. His delusion is that by 2050 the US will be in
total decline, and the world will have accepted China as its leader,
in peace and harmony.
It's increasingly clear to me that many Democrats share this delusion,
and they see a world in 2050 in which they have dictatorial control of
the US, in conjunction with the Glorious Socialist leadership of
China. What does this shared delusion mean?
For one thing, it would mean an end to the US Constitutional
government. That's not surprising. The Democrats were willing to
destroy the country in the Civil War, and they're still bitter about
losing, so it's not suprising that they still want to destroy the
country. That's the purpose of HR-1, for example.
For another thing, it means that the Democrats can re-enslave the
blacks. They've already adopted policies in Chicago, Detroit,
Baltimore and other Democrat-run cities so that as many thousands of
blacks will slaughter each other as possible -- achieving the goals of
the KKK by other means. Working in conjunction with Big Tech, the
Democrats could do what the Chinese have done in Xinjiang -- set up
massive surveillance, and use AI to track people.
Each day it becomes clearer that this "acceptance of the CCP" is the
delusion of many Democrats, sharing the delusions of the CCP as
expressed last week.
So you and other Democrats may have adopted the "acceptance
perspective" of the CCP, but I'm pleased to say that I have adopted
the "rejection perspective," as have many Republicans.