Joel wrote: ↑Thu May 05, 2022 3:48 am
Thomas lacks discernment. He believes in a convicted fraudster (Martin Armstrong) and links to videos by a shyster conman named James Corbett who peddles 9/11 conspiracies. Thomas believes in crazy things. If a great reckoning is coming, Thomas will lose out. So will you, Cool Breeze. Martin Armstrong claims to be "right" about everything, but has been wrong about nearly everything. (Most likely everything.) Corbett has taken his dim witted You Tube followers for a ride.
Corbett's followers (Thomas is one of them) are NOT red pilled; they are social outcasts and weirdos whose lives have probably been made even more difficult and left them even more socially isolated.
Both of you take the Russian side on Ukraine and attempt to defend the indefensible. I don't see how either one of you is special or enlightened. Both of you are drowning in conspiracy theories and paranoid delusions.
I will not wish either one of you luck.
At least this is a serious post with a name. For that, I congratulate you. I'm not sure what "believes in" means regarding MA, and I don't know what "convicted fraudster" has to do with anything, knowing that the FBI and other three letter organizations are political hack groups that just seek and destroy without real evidence or with the ability to throw unlimited funds at you while you can't defend yourself and they put you in prison. See Whitmer fraud case (luckily the jury acquitted because people are finally wise), see the Jan 6 fraud, see the FISA fraud, see the Durham investigation, the list is endless.
I don't think Thomas "believes"
all things that everyone you quote says. In this you show your dishonesty and lack of discernment. If Corbett for example, or Armstrong, says something that you disagree with that Thomas purports or supports as ideas of theirs, point it out! What you whining naysayers do all the time is just naming someone and character assassination, as if we don't take a man's ideas and critically assess them. All of them.
Again, what am I defending that's "indefensible"? More random and big platitudes so that you don't actually have to argue a point. It's all emotion. I know that the position that the violation of the Budapest and Minsk accords, the speeches of Mr. Putin for
years detailing the NATO and western warmongering and abuses, the Zelensky Panama papers and puppet regime, the Maidan Massacre and 2014 Ukrainian COUP ... look I just mentioned
several very specific things that people like you won't counter,
because you can't. And I asked John about those very things for several weeks now and crickets.
The truth is that this is very complicated, tragic, and the west and NATO are sacrificing Ukrainians so they can keep up the fake energy slush fund they shared with the jew backers and Zelensky puppet, who killed many themselves, and enriched themselves along with Biden and more US pols. If you don't believe me, look up Kolomoisky and all the other "oligarchs" that stir up all the trouble there. It's quite obvious.