Religion and Vaccine Arguments

As requested, this sub-forum is for partying, fun, gossip, conundrums, flirting, comedy, tragedy, or whatever.
tim
Posts: 1085
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

https://wherearethenumbers.substack.com ... -now-admit
We were right! The UK ONS now admit that deaths in the vaccinated were categorised as unvaccinated in 2021

The ONS denied it then but admit it now.
In 2021 when the UK ONS (Office for National statistics) started releasing its vaccine by mortality status reports we exposed that there were large spikes in the non-covid death rates in the 'unvaccinated'. These spikes in mortality coincided with the first main vaccine rollout and did so for each age group (see this report, for example).

Here is the chart for non-covid mortality rates in weeks 1-38 of 2021 for the 60-69 age groups:

Image

The charts for the other age groups looked much the same.

We asserted that these obvious anomalies were a result of the standard ONS procedure of categorising anyone within 20 days of their first dose as ‘unvaccinated’. However, in our own discussions with the ONS they maintained that, although that method was used for their efficacy calculations, it was not used when it came to mortality. They clearly said that a person dying any time after vaccination was correctly categorised, as a vaccinated death, in the mortality data they regularly released to the public and which formed the basis of a massive public communication campaign encouraging vaccination.

To ‘explain’ the spikes the ONS pushed the implicit assumption that there was a phenomenon called the 'healthy vaccinee' effect, whereby they claimed that people ‘close to death’ were not vaccinated. And they made this bold claim without any data to support it whatsoever.

Apart from the fact that this would have contradicted the NHS policy at the time we showed that, while a healthy vaccinee effect might have partly explained the longer term lower non-covid mortality rates in the vaccinated, it could not possibly have explained those spikes in mortality rates.

They could only be explained by categorising deaths shortly after vaccination as unvaccinated. Yet the ONS, along with many of the staunchest covid vaccine disciples, doubled down on their insistence that such miscategorisation did not occur. To them all the anomalies in the ONS data could only be explained by the hallowed ‘healthy vaccinee effect’.

Later, the ONS did actually claim that there was indeed an ‘unhealthy vaccinee effect’ but did so to explain other anomalies in the data. Clearly the ONS was so self-serving they did not see the contradictions between these claims and simply wanted to have their cake and eat it.

As a result of a subject access request that Clare Craig submitted to the ONS we have now found out that we were correct after all!

Clare has posted on this twitter/X thread, an internal ONS email confirming that the NIMS database of vaccinated people, that the ONS relied upon, had excluded those people who had died before vaccine records had been sent back to the central system:


When we pointed out to the ONS exactly this possibility for miscategorisation in 2021 they continued to deny that it had happened (see Table 8 of our report here).

Why is this so important? Because the ONS data - possibly more so than any other source of data in the world - was used to bolster the claim that the vaccines were highly effective and safe.

And, as we have always argued, and which is now certain, any claims of efficacy and safety based on their data were completely illusionary and subject to the cheap trick of miscategorisation whereby even a placebo - or something even worse - could be ‘shown’ to be safe and effective.

They therefore lied and intentionally created and spread misinformation. We were accused of conspiracy thinking and our reputations were tarnished as a result.

But we were right!
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5

tim
Posts: 1085
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

https://merylnass.substack.com/p/the-da ... -telegraph
The Dam Has Broken. UK's Telegraph says COVID shots "may be to blame for increase in excess deaths"

Front page. Penned by Sarah Knapton, Science Editor, who has written truthful articles about COVID and deaths before
Image
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5

tim
Posts: 1085
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

https://supersally.substack.com/p/austr ... r-february
Australian Mortality Data for February 2024 Released: The Mass Mortality Event is Clearly Ongoing as Excess Deaths Continue. 2024 COD Data shows a Clear Increase in Cancer and Respiratory deaths.

Men aged 0-44, and women aged 65-84 had their worst ever recorded February mortality in 2024. Males and females aged 75-84 both had their highest January mortality in 2024.
ABS no longer uses a baseline for these data releases, referring only to deaths in the same months in 2022 and 2023. Comparing 2024 deaths with those in 2022 and 2023, it would appear that death rates are “within range” and there is nothing to see. However, the failure to account for typical death rates prior to the “pandemic” is obfuscating the ongoing excess deaths.

I have prepared a baseline against which to assess excess deaths. This baseline inputs the 2015 to 2019 deaths into excel forecast, to forecast the numbers of deaths that would have been expected from 2020 though to 2024 and to arrive at a possible excess death count. Using this approach, the provisional January 2024 deaths are 8%, and the provisional February 2024 deaths are 1.9% above baseline.

It should be noted that the Covid-19 injectables rolled out in February 2021. February 2021 was the last ‘typical’ death month, marked with a red arrow in all of my figures. Thereafter, from March 2021 onwards, deaths inflected upwards, with a clear separation from all prior death levels: 2022 had exceptional excess deaths, 2023 was somewhat lower than 2022, and 2024 to February is running slightly higher than 2023. Highest annual and monthly deaths are highlighted below. The mass mortality event is still ongoing!
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5


Cool Breeze
Posts: 2966
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2020 10:19 pm

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by Cool Breeze »

Vindicated.

Guest

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by Guest »

Cool Breeze wrote:
Sun Jun 09, 2024 8:42 pm
Vindicated.
Good to see you back, CB.

Cool Breeze
Posts: 2966
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2020 10:19 pm

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by Cool Breeze »

Guest wrote:
Mon Jun 10, 2024 10:12 am
Cool Breeze wrote:
Sun Jun 09, 2024 8:42 pm
Vindicated.
Good to see you back, CB.
Thanks, my man.

You will see, and are, what I've said is all coming true.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests