Defensive Interpretation on GD?

[malleni]

...

[malleni]

...

[malleni]

** Ahmadinejad holds two-day Holocaust denial conference
** http://www.generationaldynamics.com/cgi ... 13#e061213

John,
Thank you for your link, but:
1. important link on your page does not work
2. I must admit that I stopped to read your site for time ago, since in my point of view there are really nothing new to read. Namely, I understand your site as pure "translation" of the US administration policy and main stream media. Personally I do not need this "help"... Thank you.
3. Finally things like: "...Generational Dynamics predicts that the Mideast is headed for a new genocidal war..." - Exactly those kind of "predictions" are more irritating jokes that anything others. How difficult is to "predict" such event, in situation where an artificial country, made by World powers (US and GB) before 60 years, threatening and oppressing all neighbors from its beginnings (EVEN with nukes!) AND always with support of its "grounders" which also getting a big part of cake - in each US "democratic" elections? Even worse... when those "grounders" in US has obviously huge economical (and others) problem at home.

Further:
I can not understand how a conference about Holocaust could be "antisemitic".
Even from your site it is impossible to find that Ahmadinejad is - "antisemitic"... despite picture with with former Ku Klux Klan Imperial Wizard David Duke.
I do not understand that Ahmadinejad even form your (working) link deny Holocaust - but insist that it should be historically investigate more in detail and facts.
Why you think this could be - a problem?
Obviously you are identify all Jews with Zionism.

I am suggesting to you as usually, that instead of your wrongly "explanation on your site - please try to investigate situation even from other sources rather that mainstream media:
http://www.counterpunch.org/atzmon03032007.html
I personally believe that you think that you are "bigger American" than Dennis Kucinich and Ron Paul (even if they are small when you measure their weights)... They are perhaps NOT "pro-American" as you?... (definitely not on your understanding of "Americanism")...
http://hnn.us/roundup/entries/40314.html

Someone who definitely knows things better than me (and of course, better than you also, as the meter of fact).
John, I am sure that you considering him as a "bed American" too, but here are the facts:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ray_McGovern
And what he saying about Iran:
http://www.antiwar.com/mcgovern/

Lets see what Ahmadinejad himself saying about it- to magazine Time:
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/print ... 27,00.html

Lets see what Iranian Jews have to say:
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/881714.html
http://www.iribnews.ir/Full_en.asp?news_id=259090&n=25
http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0427/p01s03-wome.html
http://www.forward.com/articles/9834/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persian_Jews

In your case (...and if you would honestly like to find a neutral position) - I would suggest you to try again...
The nonsense form your home page "...we're pro-American"(it obviously means pro-US regime) & "We take no sides" - can not help you.
Why?
Because - it is simply a nonsense in case of your "Americanism & neutrality".

Kind regards

[malleni]

mallleni -- I've transferred your posting to "Defensive Interpretation
on GD?", where it seems more appropriate.

Sorry John.

1. I can not find it.
2. I think that my discussion definitely need not to be "transfered" anywhere because - it is definitely discussion about Iran and can be a contribution here.
3. It has nothing to do with GD but much with Iran discussion and that was actually answer on your link
(I expected - either discussion or silence from you about this topic - but not at all that you moving my simple and correct discussion somewhere because you do not like it.)

So I respectfully disagree that my discussion be moved from this topic.
I do not find your move correct. Please - next time, ask me before such an action.
If you do not like to discuss with arguments (or not at all) - I agreed...
BUT if you do not like discussion and can not find any reasonable ground which supporting your theory - than you have just two possibilities:
1. Not to discuss
2. Disagree but without any reasonable evidence in your favor.

You choose real bad "solution"...
(Some kind of totalitarian.)

As said - I am really angry that you did it without any consultation with me!
And besides - I do not brake any civil or Forum rule in my discussion...
(We can definitely exclude explanation - "yes but you do not agreed with John"... It would be really, not just non-democratic, but - miserly)

Moreover, please, put back my discussion about Iran here in this topic, where it has its correct place.

Thank you.

[John]

The "Iran" topic is currently being used for discussion of the
upcoming Iranian presidential elections. Your lengthy harangues
about me and Generational Dynamics are off-topic for the election
discussion.

[malleni]

The "Iran" topic is currently being used for discussion of the
upcoming Iranian presidential elections. Your lengthy harangues
about me and Generational Dynamics are off-topic for the election
discussion.

The "Iran" topic - is just that... IRAN topic.

Nobody said or marked it - "Iran election discussion"

On this topic
1. After my discussion with member "protagonist" you give a link to your site.
2. I give you my opinion.
3. your "harangues" (even about other members) are not short neither and regarding GD theory - I always thought that anyone who has a THEORY on his side can always be prepared and open for honest discussion... Especially on forum which has name "Generational Dynamics Forum"...

OK... My mistake.
Sorry.