Generational Dynamics Forum - New Site

Wags wrote: Tue May 05, 2026 9:28 pm

tim wrote: Fri May 01, 2026 8:26 am https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/ ... ll-chronic

Not to be argumentative, but her degree is in business administration not science or healthcare. Maybe she’s well educated enough to make such a claim, but I seriously doubt it. I do think there is some truth regarding vaccines and systemic toxicity (alterations in immune system and neuro inflammation, for sure), but to pretend that’s the whole reason behind chronic disease? That would mean the Amish never have chronic disease (like hypertension, diabetes, or cancer)— which I’ve personally seen and treated in the Amish.
Trauma, diet, and genetics all play a factor (as well as the gut microbiome). As a healthcare provider who did NOT get the vax for Covid—because the data was always sketch—I do feel like we’ve been fed a bunch of false/misleading information. And one can’t reasonably blame the totality of chronic disease on vaccines.

Not too long ago, lethal infections were feared in the Western world. Since that time, many countries have undergone a transformation from disease cesspools to much safer, healthier habitats. Starting in the mid-1800s, there was a steady drop in deaths from all infectious diseases, decreasing to relatively minor levels by the early 1900s. The history of that transformation involves famine, poverty, filth, lost cures, eugenicist doctrine, individual freedoms versus state might, protests and arrests over vaccine refusal, and much more.Today, we are told that medical interventions increased our lifespan and single-handedly prevented masses of deaths. But is this really true?Dissolving Illusions details facts and figures from long-overlooked medical journals, books, newspapers, and other sources. Using myth-shattering graphs, this book shows that vaccines, antibiotics, and other medical interventions are not responsible for the increase in lifespan and the decline in mortality from infectious diseases. If the medical profession could systematically misinterpret and ignore key historical information, the question must be asked, “What else is ignored and misinterpreted today?”Perhaps the best reason to know our history is so that the worst parts are never repeated.

tim wrote: Fri May 01, 2026 8:26 am https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/ ... ll-chronic

Sasha Latypova: 98% of ALL Chronic Diseases Are Caused by Vaccines

"Only 2% of the risk is everything else... including glyphosate, chem spraying, EMF radiation, etc."

Sasha Latypova argues that vaccines and related injections are the primary cause of chronic illnesses across all age groups.

She claims that 98% of an individual’s risk of developing conditions such as cancer, cardiovascular disease, autoimmune disorders, and neurodegenerative illnesses comes from vaccines, while only 2% is attributable to all other environmental and lifestyle factors combined (e.g., chemicals, radiation, pollutants).

She also asserts that mainstream narratives intentionally portray chronic disease as having many uncertain causes (“it could be anything”) in order to deflect attention away from vaccines.

According to her, researchers who challenge this narrative face professional consequences.

The clip features Sasha Latypova in an interview with UK Column, where she presents a personal “working theory” about the causes of chronic disease.

Persistence of Vaccine mRNA, Plasmid DNA, Spike Protein, and Genomic Dysregulation Over 3.5 Years Post-COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination

Conclusion: This case documents the longest reported in vivo persistence of vaccine-derived mRNA, plasmid DNA fragments, and spike protein following mRNA vaccination, with reproducible detection across multiple independent laboratories, distinct biological compartments, and complementary molecular detection systems extending beyond 3.5 years after the final dose. Spike protein, spike mRNA sequences, and plasmid backbone elements were identified in both immune cells and somatic tissue, with continued absence of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein or antibodies, effectively excluding prior infection as the source.

Dr. Karl Jablonowski: The Cover-Up of Covid Shot Injuries is “THE BETRAYAL OF OUR TIME—So Vast That We Cannot Even Count Its Casualties.”

The cost we may never fully measure.

In this clip, Dr. Karl Jablonowski delivers a sweeping allegation that U.S. public health institutions failed to monitor and respond to adverse events linked to COVID-19 vaccines.

He frames it as a historic “betrayal,” arguing that the very agencies tasked with safeguarding the public didn’t just fall short, they failed outright.

The FDA was “completely blind” to emerging harms, the CDC “wasn’t even looking,” and, most damningly, it chose to ignore its own safety standards at the very moment they mattered most.

BREAKING STUDY: Infant Mortality Surged 37% and Birth Defect Deaths Jumped 46% After COVID-19 "Vaccine" Rollout

Official Philippine government data show a 20-year decline in infant mortality was completely erased in just five years—alongside a collapse in live births.

In 1990, Anthony Schapira and his colleagues at the Royal Free Hospital in London published a paper in the Journal of Neurochemistry. They had measured the activity of the mitochondrial electron transport chain in the substantia nigra of patients who had died with Parkinson’s disease. One specific component — Complex I, the enzyme that begins the chain by accepting electrons from NADH — was significantly reduced. Other components were normal. The defect was specific, anatomical, reproducible.

What they wrote next is the sentence the field has spent the last thirty-six years declining to act upon:

“This biochemical defect is the same as that produced in animal models of parkinsonism by 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) and adds further support to the proposition that an environmental toxin may have a role in the pathogenesis of the disease.”¹

Schapira is not a fringe figure. He is one of the most cited researchers in mitochondrial neurology. The journal is mainstream. The peer review was standard. The sentence is plain English. The biochemical lesion that defines Parkinson’s disease is the same lesion produced by a known chemical poison. Environmental toxin, his words, may have a role in the pathogenesis.

Thirty-six years later the disease is still officially classified as idiopathic. The word means cause unknown.

This is not a small thing. It is the entire problem. The establishment’s foundational biochemistry, in its own peer-reviewed literature, named the mechanism and the cause-class in 1990. Parkinson’s continues to be presented to patients, families, doctors, and the public as a mysterious neurodegenerative condition of unknown origin requiring lifelong symptomatic management with a drug regimen that does not address the disease. Research investment focuses on genetics, on protein aggregation, and on monoclonal antibodies designed to clear the aggregated proteins from the brain — none of which has produced a disease-modifying therapy in sixty years of trying.²

What follows is an attempt to read the establishment’s own files honestly, to identify what the medical literature has been saying about Parkinson’s, and to name what the word idiopathic is doing.

Sasha Latypova: 98% of ALL Chronic Diseases Are Caused by Vaccines

"Only 2% of the risk is everything else... including glyphosate, chem spraying, EMF radiation, etc."

Sasha Latypova argues that vaccines and related injections are the primary cause of chronic illnesses across all age groups.

She claims that 98% of an individual’s risk of developing conditions such as cancer, cardiovascular disease, autoimmune disorders, and neurodegenerative illnesses comes from vaccines, while only 2% is attributable to all other environmental and lifestyle factors combined (e.g., chemicals, radiation, pollutants).

She also asserts that mainstream narratives intentionally portray chronic disease as having many uncertain causes (“it could be anything”) in order to deflect attention away from vaccines.

According to her, researchers who challenge this narrative face professional consequences.

The clip features Sasha Latypova in an interview with UK Column, where she presents a personal “working theory” about the causes of chronic disease.

We Now Know How The Government Lied About the COVID Vaccines

For more than 250 years, the same playbook has been used to prop up toxic vaccines. At long last, we have a chance to end it.

Story at a Glance:

Since the dawn of vaccination, authorities have habitually doubled down on unsafe and ineffective vaccines, regardless of the pushback they received or the evidence against them.

Sustaining this has required increasingly brazen methods to censor and conceal the deluge of “extremely rare” injuries caused by an ever-expanding vaccination schedule.

Senator Ron Johnson, who has worked tirelessly to expose this coverup, recently held a Senate hearing whose title says it all: “Unmasked: How Biden Health Officials Purposely Turned a Blind Eye Toward COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Signals.”

Faced with a tsunami of vaccine injuries too large for anyone to ignore, the FDA and CDC searched for a way to statistically dismiss it, eventually settling on comparing Moderna’s injury rate to Pfizer’s and declaring the vaccines “safe” because there was no major difference between the two.

When a senior FDA analyst pointed out this obvious flaw and suggested comparing them to less toxic vaccines instead, documents show the entire FDA turned against her to suppress her findings. As a result, dozens of conditions we have all seen the COVID vaccines cause were never officially linked to them—despite the data clearly showing they were.

The unprecedented damage caused by the COVID-19 vaccines has created a historic loss of trust in the parties who covered it up, giving us a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to force them to start telling the truth and end an immunization experiment that has profoundly damaged the health of our society.

COVID Vaccine Hearing Exposes Deliberate Blind Eye to ‘Overwhelming Evidence of Harm’

This is not a fringe “conspiracy theory.” It was revealed by the government’s own investigation—and it’s a story they don’t want you to read.

According to VAERS, the US’s vaccine adverse event reporting system, more adverse events and deaths have been reported following COVID vaccines than from all other vaccines combined over the system’s 30+ year history.

More dangerous than ivermectin. More dangerous than hydroxychloroquine (which turned out not to be so dangerous after all).

It was 55 times more deadly than the flu vaccine (0.46 deaths vs 25.5 deaths per million doses).

And even more dangerous than Remdesivir, which earned the nickname “Run Death Is Near” after it wreaked havoc on the kidneys and livers of tens of thousands of COVID patients in the hospital.

But still the question remains. How did US health officials miss a safety signal this big?

Dr. Szarfman went on to retire from the FDA in 2025 after more than 35 years of service.

She raised concerns about safety signal masking. The FDA essentially told her to shut up.

Because in their eyes, “49 examples of extreme masking” could create “erroneous conflicts” and fuel “vaccine hesitancy.”

So, health officials decided to let people die from devastating side effects and bury the data because it was too inconvenient to take head-on.

People should be going to jail for this.

BREAKING: Senate Investigation Finds FDA Officials Covered-Up 25 COVID Shot Safety Signals

FDA’s own data flagged sudden cardiac death, heart attacks, blood clots, neurological damage, and dementia… and the FDA analyst uncovering it was ordered to “cease and desist.”

Their new method (Regression-Adjusted Gamma Poisson Shrinker — RGPS) fixed a known flaw called “masking” — where signals for one COVID vaccine get drowned out by the sheer volume of reports from the others.

What they found was explosive:

49 examples of extreme masking
~25 new statistically significant safety signals that FDA’s standard MGPS method completely missed
Signals included: sudden cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction, pulmonary infarction, Bell’s palsy, non-site specific embolism/thrombosis, dementia, and “Death and sudden death” — for Pfizer, Moderna, and J&J shots
Dr. Szarfman repeatedly shared these findings with senior CBER officials (the very people in charge of vaccine safety), including Dr. Peter Marks, in March, April, May, and July 2021.

Their response?

Told her to “hold off” on creating and sending any more data mining reports
Called her work a “major distraction”
Worried it would “create erroneous conflicts that feed into anti-vaccination rhetoric”
Eventually ordered her to “cease and desist”
Later, FDA quietly locked down distribution of its own weekly data mining reports to CDC — right around the time FOIA requests and Sen. Johnson’s letters started coming in. One CDC official even admitted they may have asked FDA to stop sending them “because of the FOIAs.”

Even after Dr. Szarfman and DuMouchel published their findings in Drug Safety (2022) showing masking was eight times more likely with COVID vaccines, and Dr. Robert Califf replied “Thanks. These are good,” no changes were made to the methodology.

This is documented, internal FDA communication showing deliberate suppression of safety signals at the exact moment millions of Americans were being told the shots were “safe and effective.”

The cover-up continues to unravel. Accountability is urgently warranted.