Generational Dynamics Forum - New Site

The 1979 revision of the International Classification of Diseases eliminated all cause-of-death classifications associated with vaccination.⁴ Previous versions of the ICD had listed “prophylactic inoculation and vaccination” as a separate cause-of-death category, with subcategories for deaths caused by specific vaccines. The 1979 revision and every subsequent update removed these. Since 1979, medical certifiers have had no code to assign vaccine-related deaths to. They are required, by the structure of the manual they use, to assign the death to a different category.

The asymmetry this produces is striking. The same federal government that maintains the ICD code structure also operates the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, established by the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. As of May 2021, the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program had awarded more than $4.5 billion in compensation for vaccine injuries and deaths.⁷ The federal government, in one capacity, compensates families for deaths caused by vaccines. The same federal government, in another capacity, removes the cause-of-death code that would allow those deaths to be officially documented in mortality statistics. The compensation requires the cause; the mortality statistics deny it. Both are operated by the same institution.

This structure has been in place for forty-six years. Every infant death that has occurred in temporal proximity to vaccination since 1979 has been recorded under a different code than the one that would name what happened. SIDS, “accidental suffocation,” “unknown cause,” “unspecified viral disease,” “diseases of the blood,” “cardiac arrest,” and “shaken baby syndrome” are among the 130 categories that have absorbed these deaths.² The codes operate as containers. The volume of what they contain has grown as the schedule has grown.

What Is SIDS?

An Essay on the Diagnostic Category Built to Receive What Cannot Be Officially Named

Before 1969, this category did not exist. Before organized vaccination programs expanded in the 1960s, what was then called crib death was so rare that it was not mentioned in infant mortality statistics.² The term Sudden Infant Death Syndrome was created in 1969 in response to a rise in unexplained infant deaths that coincided with expanded vaccination campaigns. By 1972, SIDS had become the leading cause of post-neonatal mortality in the United States, the leading cause of death between 28 days and one year of age.³ A category that had not existed three years earlier had become the dominant verdict on dead infants.

The 1967 Pediatrics review by Maria Valdes-Dapena examined the world literature on sudden unexpected infant deaths from 1954 to 1966. The review documented a rising phenomenon in industrialized nations, with the author professing herself “woefully ignorant” of the cause.⁵ The deaths were already occurring. They had not yet been categorized.

A causal connection to vaccination was made early. Within fifteen years of the Valdes-Dapena review, William Torch presented findings at the 1982 American Academy of Neurology Conference identifying DPT vaccination as a potential cause of the deaths the new category had been created to receive.⁶ The category was new. The deaths were not. What was new was the schedule that produced them and the institutional naming that made them legible only as a syndrome of unknown origin.

In 1969, when the term Sudden Infant Death Syndrome was created, the United States was four years past the introduction of the measles vaccine and five years past the licensing of the oral polio vaccine. DPT was being administered at expanded coverage. Mumps and rubella vaccines had been licensed. The childhood schedule was growing rapidly. Pre-1969, organized vaccination of infants was limited; crib death was rare and unstratified.² The temporal alignment between the expansion of the schedule and the creation of the category to absorb the resulting deaths went unnoticed because nobody was looking. There was no institutional reason to look.

Ivermectin Effective Against New World Screwworms Larval Stages (L1, L2, L3)

As New World screwworms emerge in Texas and New Mexico, the evidence suggests ivermectin may be one of the most effective defenses in both animals and humans.

I guess this time they won't be able to say:
•
“You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously y’all. Stop it.”
•
12 field studies conducted in South America — where New World screwworm outbreaks are common — found that ivermectin provided more than 97% protection against screwworm infestations in wounds under real-world conditions.

Canada, land of the dead (and the state's ongoing cover-up of that macabre toll)

Justin Trudeau, and many others, must one day stand in the dock with Bill Gates, Dr. Fauci and all their peers and patrons

In doing our compilations of those who have “died suddenly” worldwide since the COVID “vaccination” rollout, we’ve found that Canada appears to lead the world, with between 400 and 500 deaths per week. This number is especially striking, since Canada’s “free press” has done its best, or worst, not to report such deaths by turbo-cancer, heart disease, stroke and other ailments more exotic, as well as deaths with no cause given, even when the decedents were unnaturally young.

The Canadian government’s desperation to keep its eugenicist campaign under wraps has entailed the conviction, last year, of Ottawa Police Detective Helen Grus for Discreditable Conduct. Why? Because she had not asked permission to investigate a cluster of infant deaths in Ottawa.

One of the Greatest Manipulations Humanity Has Ever Known." She Told the Truth About the Pfizer Vaccine. Then Her Body Broke.

One biostatistician’s 25 years of industry experience. Four-and-a-half years of relentless analysis. And a death that should never have happened.

What She Found

Cotton didn’t rely on pre-coded variables for deaths. She searched every symptom text field for phrases like “Death,” “Patient died,” “Pronounced dead,” “Found dead,” “Patient expired” — and added missing death data where the text clearly documented it.

The results were, and remain, chilling.

Thousands of deaths temporally linked to vaccination. A previously unseen volume of serious adverse events. Specific risk groups, including pregnant women with alarming rates of miscarriage and fetal complications.

Under normal circumstances —before 2020— these signals would have immediately suspended any vaccine campaign.

China Engineers Mutant H5N1 Influenza Viruses 560,000 Times More Lethal in Mammals: Journal 'Emerging Microbes & Infections'

As the U.S. simultaneously performs similar gain-of-function lab experiments.

Family Receives $373,000 Federal Settlement After Fatal Guillain-Barré Case Following Flu Vaccine: My Vaccine Lawyer

U.S. VICP vaccine injury system has paid out $5.6 billion in compensation—roughly $403,000 per day—since its founding.

DNI Tulsi Gabbard steps down due to husband's bone cancer; Rod Stewart cancels 2 shows in Vegas; UK: Zayn Malik cancels US tour; IR: Coronas cancel Limerick gig; NZ: STATIC-X cancels this year's tour

UK: Labour's Tom Watson on leave of absence with 2nd prostate cancer; NO: Queen Sonja in ICU due to "heart failure"; AU: rugby's Jai Arrow, 30, retires, diagnosed with motor neurone disease; more

Barry Manilow may not survive lung cancer surgery; Pam Bondi has thyroid cancer; Spurs' coach Gregg Popovich looks half-dead after stroke; Peabo Bryson recovering from stroke

UK: footie Kevin Keegan has Stage 4 abdominal cancer; IN:MasterChef India winner Pankaj Bhadouria has breast cancer; more

A survey of the likely global toll of COVID “vaccination,” based on the reports collected by our worldwide team of researchers this past week.

The 12 Remedies They Can't Patent

Why the cheapest, oldest, best-documented treatments vanished from medicine

How They Rig Clinical Trials and The Price We All Pay For It

A practical guide to spotting doctored research and finding the therapies that actually help

Story at a Glance:

Scientific research has provided immense benefit to society, but as its success earned it power, prestige and enormous financing, incentives shifted from advancing humanity to protecting the status quo and ensuring vast profits for the pharmaceutical industry.

We spend more and more on science each year, yet the problems we’ve tasked it with solving remain unsolved, even when solutions already exist. COVID-19 made this painfully clear: dozens of treatments existed for the disease, but rather than utilize them, the medical establishment treated the infection as “incurable” and used that framing to justify a series of counterproductive policies which devastated the economy and left us with a death toll well over a hundred times greater than the poorest nations that did nothing at all.

Central to maintaining this orthodoxy is the belief that large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) must serve as the primary arbiter of scientific truth while other viable and proven research approaches are discarded. While RCTs are sometimes immensely helpful, their data often has minimal clinical relevance to patients yet their dominance displaces all the scientific data which does.

Because large RCTs cost tens of millions of dollars, only a handful of parties can afford to conduct them, which means they are typically done to bring profitable products to market rather than to advance health. Worse, since so much money rides on each trial, perverse incentives always exist to doctor the results so a positive outcome is guaranteed.
Over the years, a robust system of ways to rig trials has emerged, with tactics that exaggerate or fabricate benefits while downplaying or erasing harms. Despite being well recognized, these tactics persist because the regulators and medical journals who depend on the status quo turn a blind eye.

This article provides a concise summary of how trials are routinely rigged, gives you the resources to spot this manipulation and protect yourself from it, and highlights the straightforward solutions that could bring science back to something that prioritizes advancing humanity.

A few weeks ago I emailed my bulldog breeder, from whom I recently acquired a puppy, the following: “The CDC is normalizing mandatory draconian rabies vaccines and microchipping of dogs so that their owners follow suit — this represents nothing more than the tightening of the dystopian technocratic screws for ever growing surveillance and deadly vaccine uptake for humans and their pets alike…”

Unsurprisingly, the breeder never replied to that email.

Vets are increasingly administering vaccines into K9 tails and legs knowing full well that these are the limbs that may be amputated when the animal eventually develops vaccine-induced tumors at said injection sites. That is anything but “safe and effective.” I recently spoke with a woman who was forced by her county every few years to inject her dog with the rabies vaccine, and her beloved pet developed a tumor in the neck (not so easy to amputate an entire neck); she explained that her astute vet contacted the vaccine manufacturer, who in turn sent their reps to diagnose the dog and concluded that they were responsible such that they ended up paying in full for all of the vet bills associated with the tumor removal.