Generational Dynamics Forum - New Site

Canada, land of the dead (and the state's ongoing cover-up of that macabre toll)

Justin Trudeau, and many others, must one day stand in the dock with Bill Gates, Dr. Fauci and all their peers and patrons

In doing our compilations of those who have “died suddenly” worldwide since the COVID “vaccination” rollout, we’ve found that Canada appears to lead the world, with between 400 and 500 deaths per week. This number is especially striking, since Canada’s “free press” has done its best, or worst, not to report such deaths by turbo-cancer, heart disease, stroke and other ailments more exotic, as well as deaths with no cause given, even when the decedents were unnaturally young.

The Canadian government’s desperation to keep its eugenicist campaign under wraps has entailed the conviction, last year, of Ottawa Police Detective Helen Grus for Discreditable Conduct. Why? Because she had not asked permission to investigate a cluster of infant deaths in Ottawa.

One of the Greatest Manipulations Humanity Has Ever Known." She Told the Truth About the Pfizer Vaccine. Then Her Body Broke.

One biostatistician’s 25 years of industry experience. Four-and-a-half years of relentless analysis. And a death that should never have happened.

What She Found

Cotton didn’t rely on pre-coded variables for deaths. She searched every symptom text field for phrases like “Death,” “Patient died,” “Pronounced dead,” “Found dead,” “Patient expired” — and added missing death data where the text clearly documented it.

The results were, and remain, chilling.

Thousands of deaths temporally linked to vaccination. A previously unseen volume of serious adverse events. Specific risk groups, including pregnant women with alarming rates of miscarriage and fetal complications.

Under normal circumstances —before 2020— these signals would have immediately suspended any vaccine campaign.

China Engineers Mutant H5N1 Influenza Viruses 560,000 Times More Lethal in Mammals: Journal 'Emerging Microbes & Infections'

As the U.S. simultaneously performs similar gain-of-function lab experiments.

Family Receives $373,000 Federal Settlement After Fatal Guillain-Barré Case Following Flu Vaccine: My Vaccine Lawyer

U.S. VICP vaccine injury system has paid out $5.6 billion in compensation—roughly $403,000 per day—since its founding.

DNI Tulsi Gabbard steps down due to husband's bone cancer; Rod Stewart cancels 2 shows in Vegas; UK: Zayn Malik cancels US tour; IR: Coronas cancel Limerick gig; NZ: STATIC-X cancels this year's tour

UK: Labour's Tom Watson on leave of absence with 2nd prostate cancer; NO: Queen Sonja in ICU due to "heart failure"; AU: rugby's Jai Arrow, 30, retires, diagnosed with motor neurone disease; more

Barry Manilow may not survive lung cancer surgery; Pam Bondi has thyroid cancer; Spurs' coach Gregg Popovich looks half-dead after stroke; Peabo Bryson recovering from stroke

UK: footie Kevin Keegan has Stage 4 abdominal cancer; IN:MasterChef India winner Pankaj Bhadouria has breast cancer; more

A survey of the likely global toll of COVID “vaccination,” based on the reports collected by our worldwide team of researchers this past week.

The 12 Remedies They Can't Patent

Why the cheapest, oldest, best-documented treatments vanished from medicine

How They Rig Clinical Trials and The Price We All Pay For It

A practical guide to spotting doctored research and finding the therapies that actually help

Story at a Glance:

Scientific research has provided immense benefit to society, but as its success earned it power, prestige and enormous financing, incentives shifted from advancing humanity to protecting the status quo and ensuring vast profits for the pharmaceutical industry.

We spend more and more on science each year, yet the problems we’ve tasked it with solving remain unsolved, even when solutions already exist. COVID-19 made this painfully clear: dozens of treatments existed for the disease, but rather than utilize them, the medical establishment treated the infection as “incurable” and used that framing to justify a series of counterproductive policies which devastated the economy and left us with a death toll well over a hundred times greater than the poorest nations that did nothing at all.

Central to maintaining this orthodoxy is the belief that large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) must serve as the primary arbiter of scientific truth while other viable and proven research approaches are discarded. While RCTs are sometimes immensely helpful, their data often has minimal clinical relevance to patients yet their dominance displaces all the scientific data which does.

Because large RCTs cost tens of millions of dollars, only a handful of parties can afford to conduct them, which means they are typically done to bring profitable products to market rather than to advance health. Worse, since so much money rides on each trial, perverse incentives always exist to doctor the results so a positive outcome is guaranteed.
Over the years, a robust system of ways to rig trials has emerged, with tactics that exaggerate or fabricate benefits while downplaying or erasing harms. Despite being well recognized, these tactics persist because the regulators and medical journals who depend on the status quo turn a blind eye.

This article provides a concise summary of how trials are routinely rigged, gives you the resources to spot this manipulation and protect yourself from it, and highlights the straightforward solutions that could bring science back to something that prioritizes advancing humanity.

A few weeks ago I emailed my bulldog breeder, from whom I recently acquired a puppy, the following: “The CDC is normalizing mandatory draconian rabies vaccines and microchipping of dogs so that their owners follow suit — this represents nothing more than the tightening of the dystopian technocratic screws for ever growing surveillance and deadly vaccine uptake for humans and their pets alike…”

Unsurprisingly, the breeder never replied to that email.

Vets are increasingly administering vaccines into K9 tails and legs knowing full well that these are the limbs that may be amputated when the animal eventually develops vaccine-induced tumors at said injection sites. That is anything but “safe and effective.” I recently spoke with a woman who was forced by her county every few years to inject her dog with the rabies vaccine, and her beloved pet developed a tumor in the neck (not so easy to amputate an entire neck); she explained that her astute vet contacted the vaccine manufacturer, who in turn sent their reps to diagnose the dog and concluded that they were responsible such that they ended up paying in full for all of the vet bills associated with the tumor removal.

The geographical distribution of refusal was highly uneven: in Leicester, the center of the English anti-vaccination movement, the share of infants exempted reached 80 to 90 per cent in the early 1900s, while in much of the rest of the country exemption rates remained in single figures[9]. The Leicester case is important because it falsifies the otherwise plausible inference that compulsion necessarily produces high coverage: the city achieved low smallpox mortality through isolation and notification (the ‘Leicester method’), with very little vaccination of infants.

Vaccination Campaigns and Coverage Prior to 1930.

This post is a continuation of my series about the causes of chronic disease epidemic we are currently experiencing in the 21st century. In my previous articles, I have discussed that vaccines are by far the most significant driver of all serious chronic illness, and nearly 100% of it in children. I am currently focusing on cancer, the 2nd leading cause of death in the US after cardiovascular disease:

The report demonstrated that prior to the 19th century, cancer had not been the constant threatening presence of human life as we are lead to believe. In fact it was almost unheard of. However, mysteriously, during 19th century cancer rates rose from near absence to quite significant numbers. Even more mysteriously, it affected primarily “civilized” people, those who had access to the modern scientific medicine. As the Hoffman report demonstrated with actuarial precision, the rise of cancer over the span of the 19th century was a real trend, and NOT due to aging population, improved diagnostics, environmental/occupational exposure to toxic materials, and lack of medical care. It was often inversely correlated with racial differences (the “primitives” did not have cancer) and with socioeconomic differences (the relatively affluent classes had much more of it). The Hoffman report, despite its 800+ page volume, exactness and investigation of numerous possible factors, never mentioned the word “vaccine” even once. To me that looks like a tell - the authors already knew that vaccines were responsible. Numerous contemporaneous accounts of medical doctors confirm this. Doctors who practiced medicine instead of chasing profits via “gold standard science” knew what was killing people and animals - injection of poison from rotting putrid concoctions pushed as “protection”. Here are some illustrations of cancers developed from vaccination sites, late 1800s-early 1900s

Predictably, Moderna has secured up to $60 million from the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) to accelerate development of an Ebola “vaccine” amid an ongoing outbreak in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo, where there have been 282 confirmed cases, 42 deaths, and around 1,100 suspected cases, plus nine confirmed cases (one fatal) in Uganda.12