Generational Dynamics Forum - New Site

Investigative Group
EXCLUSIVE: Trump’s Pollster Found Voters Were Highly Concerned About Vaccines. The Poll Never Saw Daylight

An unreleased poll appears to undermine the White House’s stated rationale for pivoting away from policies that inflame pharmaceutical companies.

The Daily Caller News Foundation obtained a secret poll conducted in October 2025 by President Donald Trump’s longtime pollster Tony Fabrizio finding that 73% of voters expressed concern about childhood vaccine mandates, while a whopping 90% of voters expressed concern about the pharmaceutical industry’s corrupting influence. (EXCLUSIVE: Fauci Privately Called Natural Immunity Data ‘Impressive’ Before Forcing Jabs On Americans)

The October poll was never released. White House officials in media reports have instead cited a more limited poll Fabrizio conducted a month later concluding the issue is a political loser to justify Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s election-year pivot to food policy. The shift away from vaccines at Kennedy’s health department culminated last week in the termination of the lead author of the Trump administration’s policy on the childhood vaccination schedule.

The secret Fabrizio poll, which has not been previously reported, tells a different story. It shows voters’ top health concern is the drug lobby’s influence on public policy, on medical research and on news coverage, and that nearly seven in ten voters want more research on vaccines’ cumulative effect in infants. The DCNF has obtained the poll but is not publishing it at the request of its source, who does not have permission to release it.

Fabrizio’s firm, Fabrizio Lee, did not respond to requests for comment.

Ebola Vaccine That 'Sheds' in 31% of Vaccinated Given to Colorado Healthcare Workers Just Down the Road from New Bat Lab

Pending pandemic?

ERVEBO Ebola Vaccine’s ‘Shedding’ Problem

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) package insert for ERVEBO states that the vaccine “shed[s]” in 31.7% of the vaccinated and for up to 20 days after vaccination.

This means that vaccinated individuals could spread the vaccine virus to those around them.

“Vaccine virus RNA has been detected in blood, saliva, urine, and fluid from skin vesicles of vaccinated individuals,” the insert reads. “In Study 6, 31.7% (19/60) of participants 12 months through 17 years of age enrolled in a substudy shed vaccine virus in saliva following vaccination.”

Alpha-gal is not mysterious at all - it is manifestation of autoimmune vaccination injuries due to vaccines and other injectable drugs (biologics, recombinant proteins, monoclonal antibodies) containing gelatin and bovine products. Alpha gal is not found in the Amish population who live in the country side, raise cattle, and are constantly exposed to ticks that feed on cattle. Neither alpha gal nor Lyme were found by the Control Group Project that tracked 1500+ completely unvaccinated people (out of a survey of 800,000+) in the US at all ages. However, any time I post about Lyme/alpha gal not being caused by ticks I am inundated by the sufferers claiming to be completely unvaccinated! Normally, I don’t know anyone who is never vaxxed, as it’s a very small % of the population. It very much seems like this is a script designed for online campaigns/influencers, activists who want to believe in and promote the official narrative for whichever reason. It may be psychologically more palatable to think that your life was randomly wrecked by an insect (or incorrect genes) and not by you believing your idiot money whore doctor. Often times these people love their doctor, have attachment need to constantly go to the doctors for “care”, and thus, exhibit hostility to the suggestion they are injuring themselves every time they run to the doctor’s office. I don’t know, I am not a shrink, but I have seen these patterns, especially in middle-aged white women.

Weaponized Ticks!!!", a mini review.
There are no "genetically engineered ticks" in your backyard. Don't fall for propaganda designed to scare the brainwashed into Lyme vaccines and useless testing.

TLDR version:

“Alpha-gal syndrome” is a collection of autoimmune vaccination/drug/iatrogenic injuries due to vaccines and other injections containing gelatin, bovine products and many other adjuvants.

There is no scientific proof of tick bites causing alpha-gal syndrome, i.e. no animal models by which a carnivore animal becomes allergic to meat after a tick bite.
Experiments claiming genetic engineering ticks are demonstrably hyped-up lab tricks, with zero evidence these “trick-ticks” can cause meat allergy. Even if you believe in genetics (I don’t) here is no gene for alpha-gal identified today. So, how would it be “spliced” into the “tick’s genome”?

Even if you believe “genetic engineering” (known method described below), there is no evidence that the “engineered” ticks can survive and successfully outcompete normal insects in nature long enough to produce any observable difference on humans.

Alpha-gal is being hyped in media for purposes of covering up vaccine injuries. The reason alpha-gal cases are “exploding” is because new CPT billing codes allow doctors to bill for this diagnosis since 2021 (mRNA vax rollout). If a doctor can make money, they will diagnose with the new code.

Pfizer and other mRNA makers have invested billions in Lyme vaccines, and they are paying for scary infommercials about “weaponized ticks” - which is nothing but propaganda of fear to sell more vaccines and useless testing.

A federal appeals court has vacated a landmark decision that found fluoridated drinking water poses an “unreasonable risk” to children’s health under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA).

The decision by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals did not challenge the substance of the lower court’s findings — that fluoride is toxic to children and ought to be regulated. Instead, the court based its decision on procedural issues related to the lower court’s handling of the litigation.

The case will now go back to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, where District Judge Edward Chen will be required to exclude all scientific evidence that became available after 2020.

Michael Connett, attorney for the plaintiffs, told The Defender the court “instructed Judge Chen to travel back in time to 2020 and make this ruling based on a stale factual record.”

Connett said the directive to ignore years’ worth of evidence on fluoride’s dangers runs counter to the intent of the TSCA — which is to protect hundreds of millions of Americans from substances that are harmful to human health.

The federal appeals court ruling, handed down late Thursday, stemmed from a lawsuit against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) brought by consumer advocacy groups including Food & Water Watch, the Fluoride Action Network (FAN), and Moms Against Fluoridation.

The groups sued after the EPA refused to consider their 2016 citizens’ petition asking the agency to regulate fluoride.

After two bench trials, Chen ruled that fluoride at the federally recommended concentration of 0.7 milligrams/liter (mg/L) posed an “unreasonable risk” to children’s health and ordered the EPA to regulate it accordingly.

However, the 9th Circuit panel said the lower court violated the “party presentation principle” — a legal doctrine requiring courts to act as neutral arbiters rather than taking control of a case’s factual development.

Blame the Patient: The Medical Gaslighting Crisis Hiding in Plain Sight

This clip of Dr. Peter Hotez is an extreme case of medical gaslighting that is easy to spot. But what about when it’s not?

Something seismic has happened to public health in America—and most people haven’t fully processed its scale.

A 2025 JAMA study surveying pregnant mothers and parents of young children found that only 37% fully trusted the CDC vaccine schedule and planned to follow it completely.

Five years ago, a number that low would have been unimaginable.

So what’s causing the drop? And what does it mean?

In memory of those who “died suddenly” in the United States and worldwide, May 11-18, 2026

LAPD Det. Mark Furman (C); actors Tom Kane, Dennis Rush, Donald Gibb; filmmaker Brian Lindstrom; B'way actor Russell Garrett; rockers Ike Willis, Dennis Locorriere; rock producer Jack Douglas; & more

A survey of the likely global toll of COVID “vaccination,” based on the reports collected by our worldwide team of researchers this past week.

Report: Kyle Busch collapsed Wednesday in simulator

At this point, the cause of death has not been released and details remain limited.

What is known is that Busch was testing in the Chevrolet racing simulator in Concord on Wednesday when he became unresponsive and was transported to a hospital in Charlotte, several people familiar with the situation told The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because details have not been disclosed by Busch’s team or family.

The mega-talented — and controversial — NASCAR driver had died. Suddenly.

What?

I immediately thought back to Sunday’s NASCAR all-star race at Dover (Del.), when Busch said late in the day and he was not feeling well and might need to leave the race. He managed to finish, but immediately sought medical attention.

Four days later, the 41-year-old, two-time NASCAR Cup champ had passed.

No cause of death has been reported for Busch, who during his career found himself in the eye or more NASCAR storms than any other two drivers combined. His nickname of “Rowdy” was well-earned and well-deserved. He was always must-see TV, off and on the track.

I Was An MIT Educated Neurosurgeon Now I'm Unemployed And Alone In The Mountains How Did I Get Here?

2006 Ralph Baric Paper Describes Synthetic 'Scapegoat' Viruses Engineered Digitally With False Origin 'Fingerprints' to Mislead Investigators

"This powerful technique provides the bioterrorist with a ‘scapegoat’ option; leaving a sequence signature that misdirects efforts at tracking the true originators of the crime," writes Baric.

In one of the paper’s most striking passages, Baric explained that synthetic viral genomes could be intentionally engineered in the computer (in silico) to resemble what are said to be naturally circulating strains from a particular region or time period, thereby creating what he called a “scapegoat” sequence signature.

Baric wrote:

“Synthetic viral genomes can be designed to be identical with exact virus strains circulating in any given location from any year. This powerful technique provides the bioterrorist with a ‘scapegoat’ option; leaving a sequence signature that misdirects efforts at tracking the true originators of the crime.”

The statement is significant because it explicitly describes that genomic lineage tracing—one of the primary methods used to infer the geographic origin and evolutionary history of viruses—could theoretically be manipulated through synthetic genome design.

Meaning, according to Baric’s own description, a synthetically assembled virus could potentially be engineered to appear on the computer screen as though it naturally emerged from a different country, outbreak cluster, or evolutionary lineage.

Even now, years after the COVID pandemic, top scientific journals are claiming no one has been able “to solve the mystery of where a virus estimated to have killed more than 20 million people by the end of 2022, and which cost the global economy up to US$16 trillion, came from.”

Could the very “scapegoat” mechanism Ralph Baric described in 2006—the deliberate engineering of synthetic viruses with misleading genetic fingerprints designed to redirect origin investigations—explain why, despite years of intense international scrutiny, the true provenance of SARS-CoV-2 remains unresolved?

First- and secondhand accounts of the ongoing "vaccine" massacre in the United States

See what just a few people have seen with their own eyes, or heard about from reliable sources, since the "vaccination" drive began. And millions all around the world could also tell such stories.

Still more first- and secondhand accounts of the ongoing "vaccine" massacre in the United States

Remember that both Trump and Biden, and their parties, pushed for this—and that both presidents, and many in Congress (on both sides of the aisle), are, or were, severely "vaccine"-injured.