Generational Dynamics Forum - New Site

BREAKING STUDY: COVID-19 “Vaccines” Linked to Multiple Sclerosis, Lupus, Type 1 Diabetes, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Graves’ Disease, and Hashimoto’s Thyroiditis

A scoping review of 109 studies finds 56% of papers suggest a causal link between COVID-19 vaccination and six major autoimmune diseases.

Study Finds Nattokinase Dissolves 84% of Amyloid Microclots Within 2 Hours In Vitro

A natural enzyme potently degrades the same amyloid microclots recently found in 100% of COVID-19 vaccinated individuals tested.

Bombshell Rasmussen Survey Released

Millions Experienced COVID-19 Vaccine Side Effects

According to a bombshell Rasmussen survey, 36% of Americans who received the COVID-19 jab experienced side effects.

Additionally, nearly half of them believe the vaccines have caused the death of many patients.

Twenty-six percent of the people surveyed reported minor side effects, 10% reported significant side effects, and 60% of vaccinated adults reported no side effects.

According to Rasmussen, the U.S. adult population is now 258 million, which “would mean 63 million had at least some side effects from the COVID-19 vaccine, including more than 17 million who experienced major side effects.”

Forty-six percent of all American Adults believe it is likely that side effects of COVID-19 shots caused a significant number of unexplained deaths, down from 55% in September 2024 - including 25% who say it’s Very Likely.

Forty-four percent (44%) now don’t think a significant number of deaths have been caused by vaccine side effects, including 20% who believe it’s Not At All Likely. Another 12% are not sure.

Although polling has statistical errors and biases, the trend is clear: a significant minority of people believe that the Nobel Prize-winning modified RNA COVID-19 inoculation harmed them. And the discrepancy between what the public is reporting via side effects, including severe outcomes, and what the scientific literature and CDC reports are is stark. We must get to the reason why there is a massive disconnect between the public, who believe these shots have harmed them, and the scientific establishment.

Asian Population Collapse Summary. Deaths remains a step higher than Pre-pandemic levels with increases since 2018 ranging from 11.0% to 24.3%. Birth declines since 2018 range from 18.6% to 51.2%.

Hong Kong, Macau, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan Vital Statistics provide evidence of accelerating birth losses in 2025 and no recovery in deaths. Hong Kong and Taiwan have population loss.

Hong Kong. 2018 to 2025(p): 41% decline in births, 11% rise in deaths. Overt population decline since 2020 with losses accelerating.

Macau. 2018 - 2025(p): 51.9% decline in births, 17.7% rise in deaths. Nearing population decline.

Malaysia. 2018 - 2025(p): 25% decline in births, 11% rise in deaths. Population growth slowing.

Philippines. 2018 - 2024(p): 18.9% decline in births, 18.8% rise in deaths. Population growth slowing.

Singapore. 2018 - 2025(p): 23.2% decline in births, 24.3% rise in deaths. Population growth dropped by 80%, approaching population decline.

Taiwan. 2018 - 2025 (p): 40% decline in births, 16.7% rise in deaths. Decline in natural population growth since 2020, with losses accelerating.

Autism and Vaccines
QUESTIONS AND CONCERNS | PAGE 2 OF 9 | ALL PAGES
For Everyone
NOV. 19, 2025
KEY POINTS
The claim "vaccines do not cause autism" is not an evidence-based claim because studies have not ruled out the possibility that infant vaccines cause autism.
Studies supporting a link have been ignored by health authorities.
HHS has launched a comprehensive assessment of the causes of autism, including investigations on plausible biologic mechanisms and potential causal links.

BREAKING: CDC quietly rewrites its vaccine–autism guidance

In a stunning shift, the CDC now says its own “vaccines don’t cause autism” claim was not evidence-based.

For the first time in a generation, the US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has rewritten its official position on whether vaccines can cause autism.

This is a change that could reshape one of the most politically charged and emotionally fraught debates in modern medicine.

In a website update published on 19 November 2025, the agency now states that the long-standing claim “vaccines do not cause autism” is “not an evidence-based claim” because scientific studies “have not ruled out the possibility that infant vaccines cause autism.”

The page also acknowledges that “studies supporting a link have been ignored by health authorities.”

It’s difficult to overstate the significance of these statements. For nearly two decades, they would have been unthinkable for a federal public health agency.

The timing is equally striking.

The change arrives at a moment when the political and scientific landscape around vaccine safety is undergoing a marked shift inside the Trump–Kennedy administration.

For months, critics have accused Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr and several of the administration’s appointees of holding unconventional views on vaccine safety.

The CDC’s revised language now places the agency closer to Kennedy’s long-standing argument that federal agencies had ignored crucial evidence.

The CDC explains the shift by pointing to the Data Quality Act, which requires federal communications to accurately reflect the evidence.

Because studies have not excluded the possibility that infant vaccines could contribute to autism, the agency concedes that its long-standing categorical statement was not scientifically justified.

The update states plainly that scientific uncertainty remains, particularly for vaccines administered in the first year of life.

New Study Asks: Could Vaccine-Induced Viral Reactivation Trigger Autism?

Independent researcher Matthew Cormier explores whether vaccine-induced viral reactivation could trigger autism in a peer-reviewed study published in the Journal of Independent Medicine.

A Researcher Who Refused to Let the Door Stay Closed

When independent researcher Matthew Cormier began exploring a biological question he couldn’t shake, he didn’t expect the road ahead to look like this: months of peer-review resistance, unanswered submissions, and the sense that the topic itself—not the methodology—was unwelcome.

On his Substack, Health Uncensored, Cormier describes the situation plainly:

“I knew this hypothesis needed to be tested, but everywhere I went, no one wanted to touch it.”

What he was asking wasn’t sensational or speculative. It was a scientific question grounded in decades of data on congenital viral infections, viral encephalitis, and post-vaccination inflammatory responses. Yet simply connecting these domains proved controversial enough that major journals declined to peer-review it.

Today, that door is finally open.

Cormier’s paper, Vaccine-Induced Viral Reactivation and Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Review, Hypothesis, and Implications, is now peer-reviewed and published in the Journal of Independent Medicine. And with it, a long-overlooked biological mechanism is now on the table for rigorous investigation.

Read and Download the Full Paper
Vaccine-Induced Viral Reactivation and Autism Spectrum Disorder (JIM Vol. 1, No. 4, 2025)

About the Study
Cormier’s research proposes a testable hypothesis:

“Vaccines may trigger autism by reactivating latent viral infections children are already carrying.”

The paper reviews two well-established bodies of literature:

The role of viral infections in autism risk, especially congenital infections such as rubella, CMV, and HSV-2.

Evidence of vaccine-induced viral reactivation, in which vaccines act as immune stimuli that can awaken dormant viruses in the body—including in neural tissues.

The research does not claim a direct causal link. Rather, it proposes that in a subset of children already harboring neurotropic viruses, vaccination may trigger reactivation events that result in viral encephalitis or chronic neuroinflammation, which in turn may disrupt neurodevelopment.

“This potential link hasn’t been addressed or covered by any of the other experts in the field,” Cormier said in his video introducing the study.

The hypothesis is based on a comprehensive review of 54 studies across PubMed, Google Scholar, and other medical databases. Cormier used targeted search terms to examine overlapping domains of research that are rarely explored together:

Autism and viral encephalitis

Vaccines and herpesvirus reactivation

Neuroinflammation and immune dysregulation

Maternal infection and fetal brain development

What he found, he says, was a pattern worth investigating—not as a claim, but as an invitation to the scientific community.

Key Findings
A pathway rooted in established research

The paper draws from decades of virology and neurology to build a biologically plausible chain of events:

Congenital or early viral infections—including rubella, CMV, and HSV—are known to affect fetal or early brain development.

Viral encephalitis, especially from herpes simplex, has been shown to trigger autistic regression or autism-like symptoms at multiple life stages—not just infancy.

Latent neurotropic viruses such as HSV-1 can remain dormant in the central nervous system for years.

Vaccines, under certain conditions, have been shown in case studies to reactivate dormant herpesviruses—including after influenza and COVID-19 vaccination.

Chronic low-grade neuroinflammation is a common theme in both ASD pathology and viral reactivation cases.

The hypothesis, in Cormier’s words:

“My research presents a novel hypothesis that vaccines may trigger autism by reactivating latent viral infections children are already carrying. This potential link hasn’t been addressed or covered by any of the other experts in the field.”

Cormier is not claiming proof. He is identifying an under-explored mechanism and urging the research community to pursue it with rigor.

BREAKING NEWS: They killed Scott Adams.

The Cancer Drug Cartel sacrificed Scott Adams at the altar of Big Pharma.

On Nov.2, 2025, suffering from terminal Stage 4 Prostate Cancer, Scott Adams reached out to President Trump for help.

Scott Received Pluvicto (Keiser) + Anktiva (Bioshield)
They killed him.

They let the Cancer Drug Cartel get its hands on him and they sacrificed him at the altar of Big Pharma.

The irony here is: I helped develop and pioneer Pluvicto.
Pluvicto is a targeted Radiation therapy using the beta emitter Lutetium-177 (I have a dozen world first publications on Lutetium-177).

My work on Pluvicto technology is the entire reason why my medical license was ever attacked by Canadian authorities to begin with.

Pluvicto is great. FDA sat on the technology 20 years and wouldn’t approve it, afraid it would compete with chemo.

Novartis scooped up a $20 mil start-up that owned Pluvicto for $2 billion and bought the rights to Pluvicto.

Pluvicto is now a $100,000 to $150,000 treatment (I was giving it for free, which is why they still hold my medical license hostage).

Scott Adams got the wrong treatment
Pluvicto is not strong (that’s why Scott tells you he will need 6 treatments).

You give it much earlier, when the tumor burden is not that high.

It’s simply not strong enough for Scott’s current cancer situation.

So what is ANKTIVA?

Billionaire doctor Dr.Pat Soon-Shiong was made recently famous by Tucker Carlson.

Dr.Pat owns Bioshield which makes Anktiva, an immune infusion that stimulates NK-cells and T-cells to multiply. Anktiva is supposed to stimulate the immune system to attack the cancer better.

But there is a problem.

Scott Adams is severely COVID-19 Vaccine Injured.
We know the COVID-19 jabs damage the immune system.

Scott Adams’ T-cells and NK-cells are damaged. You can’t multiply damaged cells.

These T-cells and NK-cells may also be producing the spike protein and you will now potentially multiply cells that will produce MORE carcinogenic spike protein.

Did Dr.Pat test Scott Adams for spike protein production? Of course not.

Did Dr.Pat test Scott Adams’ T-Cells or NK-cells for function or spike? Of course not.

He just gave Scott Adams the Anktiva blindly.

So Scott got:

PLUVICTO + ANKTIVA = TOO WEAK + POTENTIAL DISASTER (MORE SPIKE)

Scott Adams had much better options
I offered much better options to Scott.

Pluvicto + Ivermectin + Mebendazole

Chemo + Ivermectin + Mebendazole

Both options had FAR HIGHER chance of success. Why?

Both Ivermectin and Mebendazole act as RADIOSENSITIZERS. So they would have sensitized Scott’s cancer cells to be better killed by PLUVICTO. Much higher chance of success than he has now.

Both Ivermectin and Mebendazole act as CHEMOSENSITIZERS. They would have sensitized Scott’s cancer cells to be better killed by Chemo and would have also reversed any chemo resistance that Scott may have developed.

Both choices were infinitely better than what he got.

I reached out to MAHA and MAGA. NO ONE ANSWERED.

Try Ivermectin and let the world see it?

They would rather kill you instead.
So that’s what they did.
And it makes me sick to watch it unfold.
=====

Dr.Pat Soon-Shiong is a billionaire who owns the LA Times.

He partnered with Peter Hotez to produce a “low cost” COVID-19 Vaccine.

Peter Hotez is a Big Pharma Vaccine High Priest who pushed contaminated, cancer causing COVID-19 Vaccines aggressively during the past 5 years.

DARPA’s Secret 60-Day Pandemic Pipeline: FOIA Documents Reveal U.S. Military Program to Synthesize Viruses From Digital Sequences and Mass-Produce mRNA Countermeasures

Newly released DARPA files show a Pentagon-backed system designed to turn raw genetic code into real viruses, isolate antibodies, and manufacture 20,000 doses of mRNA vaccines in just two months.

In memory of those who “died suddenly” in the United States and worldwide, November 10-17, 2025

Actress Sally Kirkland (Charlie’s Angels); Simpsons writer Dan McGrath; TV producer Eric Preven; C&W singer Todd Snider; blues musician Kat Williams; rapper Maxon Margiela (21) ; & more

A survey of the likely global toll of COVID “vaccination,” based on the reports collected by our worldwide team of researchers this past week.

BREAKING: CDC quietly rewrites its vaccine–autism guidance

In a stunning shift, the CDC now says its own “vaccines don’t cause autism” claim was not evidence-based.

For the first time in a generation, the US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has rewritten its official position on whether vaccines can cause autism.

This is a change that could reshape one of the most politically charged and emotionally fraught debates in modern medicine.

In a website update published on 19 November 2025, the agency now states that the long-standing claim “vaccines do not cause autism” is “not an evidence-based claim” because scientific studies “have not ruled out the possibility that infant vaccines cause autism.”

The page also acknowledges that “studies supporting a link have been ignored by health authorities.”

It’s difficult to overstate the significance of these statements. For nearly two decades, they would have been unthinkable for a federal public health agency.

The timing is equally striking.

The change arrives at a moment when the political and scientific landscape around vaccine safety is undergoing a marked shift inside the Trump–Kennedy administration.

For months, critics have accused Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr and several of the administration’s appointees of holding unconventional views on vaccine safety.

The CDC’s revised language now places the agency closer to Kennedy’s long-standing argument that federal agencies had ignored crucial evidence.

The CDC explains the shift by pointing to the Data Quality Act, which requires federal communications to accurately reflect the evidence.

Because studies have not excluded the possibility that infant vaccines could contribute to autism, the agency concedes that its long-standing categorical statement was not scientifically justified.

The update states plainly that scientific uncertainty remains, particularly for vaccines administered in the first year of life.

Scientific uncertainty finally acknowledged

The information on the website draws a sharp distinction between the infant vaccine schedule — which includes DTaP, HepB, Hib, IPV, PCV and others — and the measles–mumps–rubella (MMR) vaccine.

For the MMR, the CDC continues to cite observational evidence showing “no association … with autism spectrum disorders,” describing the conclusion as supported by “high strength of evidence.”

But the agency also acknowledges that these studies had “serious methodological limitations” and were all retrospective epidemiological analyses, the type that cannot establish cause and effect or identify subgroups who may be more vulnerable.

The acknowledgement of limitations is unusually candid for a federal agency discussing vaccines and autism.

For the infant vaccine schedule, the shift is even more dramatic.

The CDC cites a series of authoritative reviews — including the 1991 and 2012 Institute of Medicine’s assessments, and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s review in 2021 — all concluding that the evidence was “inadequate to accept or reject” a causal relationship between early-life vaccines and autism.

In other words, the fundamental scientific question remains unresolved.

Political dynamite

The political context makes this change even more consequential. Senator Bill Cassidy, who chairs the Senate Health Committee, has been one of the most vocal critics of Kennedy’s vaccine views.

Where Does the CDC’s Dishonesty Come From?

Is a new era at last is dawning at the CDC?

Story at a Glance:

•The widespread promotion of vaccination is predicated upon having profound benefits and no risks. As vaccines frequently injure their recipients, sustaining this paradigm requires suppressing all evidence of vaccine harm and psychologically programming vaccine supporters to be incapable of seeing injuries all around them.

•Because of this, Senator Ron Johnson held a historic Senate hearing where discarded individuals with vaccine injuries could testify on their injuries.

•The CDC has consistently used its authority to promote vaccination and support industry (e.g., soft drinks or lucrative therapeutics).

•In many cases, these promotions have been directly tied to the CDC taking money from industry. Unfortunately, despite both CDC employees and members of Congress demanding investigations, the matter has been largely swept under the rug.

•The CDC delegates vaccine recommendations to an impartial panel of (paid-off) experts who consistently support vaccination. Recently, RFK Jr. replaced them with scientists free of conflicts of interest.

•At the first ACIP meeting, the CDC repeated its existing playbook, both making a number of truly remarkable statements defending the COVID vaccine at odds with public data, while simultaneously admitting they did not know numerous fundamental questions about the COVID vaccines that should have been figured out years ago.

•Fortunately, times have changed, and many immediately saw these lies for what they were. Likewise, yesterday, the CDC made a historic pivot on a longstanding lie and acknowledged stating “vaccines do not cause autism” is a falsehood not supported by the existing evidence.

One of my major questions in life is whether the bad things that happen are a result of a secretive group of bad actors or are simply a naturally emergent phenomenon that would occur regardless of which group was in power behind the scenes.

On one hand, I frequently see policies be enacted in a coordinated fashion that lead to a clear outcome, and then watch as the years play out, that every institution works in unison to ensure that outcome comes to pass, and as such, when I see the opening moves, I tend to assume the ultimate outcome will follow (which, for example, is why I knew there would be vaccine mandates at the start of 2021 and why Obama’s wars would lead to a permanent unsustainable flood of immigrants into Europe).

On the other hand, when I speak to the most informed people within the government, I hear things like this:

You can always point a finger at a specific agency or person, but the reality is that as the government gets bigger and bigger, more and more fiefdoms will emerge within it, and those groups will fight for their own interests at the expense of everyone else.

Note: many Federal agencies depend on obtaining congressional funding and, therefore, will engage in stunts to ensure that funding is allocated to them. For example, the CDC will routinely hype up inconsequential “pandemics” each year, as this nationwide drama allows them to obtain more funding.