Generational Dynamics Forum - New Site

Lou Koller has cancer again; NY Giants owner John Mara has cancer; LA Council's Curren Price collapses at event; Bucs' Skip Peete collapses at practice; Olympian Laurie Hernandez has POTS

Fever's Kelsey Mitchell wracked by numbness, cramping; NASCAR driver Tyler Reddick's 4-month-old in cardiovascular ICU; gaming pioneer Rebecca Heinemann has cancer in lungs, liver; more

A survey of the likely global toll of COVID “vaccination,” based on the reports collected by our worldwide team of researchers this past week.

Dolly Parton postpones shows; Chris Stapleton postpones shows; Cody Johnson cancels tour; Evan Dando (Lemonhead) cancels gig; MPR's Angela Davis goes on leave (breast cancer)

UK: Bonehead leaves Oasis tour after cancer diagnosis; FR: Terence Atmane pulls out of Shanghai Masters ("sudden illness"); DE: Malthe Hejsel quits handball for 6 months (myocarditis); more

Devastating COVID-19 Vaccine Side Effect Confirmed by New Data: Study

Our worst fears have become reality.

Now, as many doctors long warned, the consequences of such reckless health policy are surfacing, and one of the most alarming outcomes is a dramatic rise in cancer risk.

A large-scale population study out of South Korea has now found a 27% overall increase in cancer linked to the COVID-19 injections that were marketed as “safe and effective.”

Dr. John Campbell noted: “There’s a one in a thousand chance that this result arose by chance.” He illustrated the overall cancer rise with a stark graph, as seen in the short video below:

Bombshell Vax vs. Unvax Study Finally Sees the Light of Day — And the Results Are Staggering

This data “should shock everyone.”

One striking example came from Dr. Peter Aaby. Once a vaccine believer, Dr. Aaby became a skeptic after discovering that the DTP vaccine he helped promote for African children led to 2.3 times higher mortality among the vaccinated.

Decades after launching the DTP program in Guinea-Bissau, Dr. Aaby realized only half the children there had received the shot — giving him a perfect comparative study between the vaccinated and unvaccinated.

The DTP vaccine did protect against diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis, but there was also more than a twofold increase in overall mortality. The results stunned Aaby, who now speaks openly about what he discovered.

“It’s important to recognize that no routine vaccine was tested for overall effect on mortality in randomized trials before being introduced. I guess most of you think that we know what our vaccines are doing. We don’t,” he now teaches.

Attempts to discredit the Zervos Henry Ford vaccine study fail miserably

Jake Scott and Jeffrey Morris engage in gaslighting cloaked in “expert” syntax in order to fool people into ignoring the ground-breaking Henry Ford vaxxed/unvaxxed study.

Executive Summary

Jeffrey Morris and Jake Scott will try to convince you that the Henry Ford vaxxed/unvaxxed study is flawed. While their arguments “sound” legitimate, they are actually not.

For example, Jake Scott says that vaccinated kids are just sicker, it has nothing to do with the vaccine. Then he tells us it is “detection bias” but completely fails to point out that the cancer rates were comparable in the two groups (the negative control). Or that the study design was flawed even though it followed CDC Guidelines for vaccination studies and was approved by Henry Ford itself who was so impressed that they funded the study. So many things they just ignore…

Neither Morris nor Scott suggest how the study should be done “right.” Why keep that a secret? If the CDC vax study design guidelines (developed by top experts) are wrong, why not tell us all how it should be done?

Both Morris and Scott ignore the single most important message of the film, which is that when top scientists are given a choice, the correct choice is to save their careers from ruin (even when they are about to retire) rather than tell the truth and publish honest science. Do Morris and Scott agree with Zervos’ decision to bury the study so he wouldn’t get fired? Is that the right decision? Sacrifice the health of kids to save your job?

That is the KEY MESSAGE OF THE FILM and Morris and Scott miss it completely because they are captured.

The Pfizer Job

How Pfizer carried out the biggest pharma trial heist ever - and the regulators swallowed it hook, line and sinker.

This median of 47 days was the basis on which the approval was given, but it gets worse - much worse.

In fact we are going to show that the whole study was a sham and that there never was a benefit - at all, never mind “95% reduction in infection”

Here is the chart provided by Pfizer that they used to show that there was a 95% reduction in infection. It’s impressive. The red line is the “placebo” group and the blue line is the “vaccinated” group. And although they initially start off getting infected at the same rate - after about 10 days after the first jab, the vaccinated pretty much stop getting infected at all. A true miracle vaccine.

Behind the White Coats: Six Surgeons General's $Millions in Pharma Conflicts Exposed

When “America’s Doctors” Become Big Pharma’s Spokespersons

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Six former U.S. Surgeons General recently condemned HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in an WSJ op-ed, but investigation reveals each has significant financial ties to pharmaceutical companies, healthcare corporations, or controversial ethical lapses that compromise their credibility as impartial voices.

Current Surgeon General Vivek Murthy earned $2.6 million in corporate consulting fees during the pandemic while advising the Biden campaign, and is now named in federal lawsuits for allegedly pressuring social media platforms to censor truthful vaccine side-effect information.

A leaked April 2025 memo from the Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) reveals a coordinated $2 million campaign to remove Kennedy from office, deploying “strategic voices and allies” in what appears to be an orchestrated pharmaceutical industry counter-offensive.

The revolving door between public health leadership and private industry has created a systemic crisis of credibility, with former officials monetizing their government experience through lucrative board positions and consulting arrangements with the very entities they once regulated.

Woman’s Cancer Cells Test Positive for Spike Protein Found in Pfizer’s COVID Booster

An 85-year-old woman whose breast cancer was in remission developed aggressive metastatic cancer one month after receiving her sixth mRNA COVID-19 vaccine dose.

An 85-year-old Japanese woman whose breast cancer was in remission developed an aggressive form of cancer one month after receiving her sixth mRNA COVID-19 vaccine dose — and her cancer cells tested positive for the same spike protein found in the shots, according to a new peer-reviewed study.

The study “provides direct biological evidence linking mRNA injections to cancer progression and metastasis,” epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher wrote on Substack. Hulscher said the study’s findings are “striking … strongly suggesting the spike originated from the mRNA injection, not viral infection.”

The case report by Dr. Shigetoshi Sano, a professor of dermatology at the Kochi University Medical School in Japan, was published last week as a letter in the Journal of Dermatological Science.

According to the study, the patient was diagnosed with breast cancer in 2022. She underwent a partial mastectomy and hormone therapy in April 2023, “after which she was deemed to be in remission.”

In October 2024, she received a Pfizer COVID-19 booster dose. One month later, she developed a skin lesion on her right chest. In January, the lesion was diagnosed as a skin metastasis from breast cancer.

Metastasis is when cancer cells break off from the original tumor and spread to other parts of the body.

A biopsy found that the metastatic cancer cells tested positive for the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein found in the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, but were negative for the nucleocapsid protein found in people who have recovered from viral infection.

Clinical educator Dr. Margaret Christensen, co-founder of the Carpathia Collaborative, said the study “is just one of thousands of case reports of unusual and aggressive cancers showing up in unexpected populations.”

Christensen said:

“Prior to COVID-19, post-menopausal women had much slower-growing tumors that were less likely to be deadly. Now … we are seeing devastating effects in all age groups.

“This foreign technology causes both immune suppression of the innate immune system, which goes after cancer cells, as well as overactivation of the adaptive branch of the immune system, leading to severe inflammation, auto-antibodies and cytokine production. No wonder we are seeing devastating effects in the population.”

Video: Breaking News Alliance Of Indigenous Nations Issues ORDER MRNA Biological and Technological Weapons with Dr. Joseph Sansone and Lawyer Lisa Miron

A recording from Dr. Joseph Sansone's live video

BREAKING: Bird Flu Mass Culling Resumes After Summer Pause — 4 Million Birds Exterminated in Past Month

America plunges back into a cycle of fear, failure, slaughter, and supply chain chaos.

During the summer, mass culling of poultry for H5N1 bird flu came to a complete halt after over 44 million birds were recklessly exterminated from January to May 2025:

At the current trajectory, it’s expected that mass culling will continue to ramp up as we head toward the winter months. This will result in a destabilized food supply chain, skyrocketing egg prices, chicken-to-human transmission, and prolonging of the crisis.

This also opens a window of opportunity for the vaccine cartel to roll out their long-awaited leaky bird flu vaccines.

The Revolving Door Strikes Again

Why did the FDA relentlessly suppress all evidence of vaccine injuries?

Many individuals I’ve spoken to believe Peter Marks is the government official most directly responsible for the entire COVID catastrophe, and those I know who directly interacted with him despise him. For that reason, six months ago, I published a detailed exposé of his conduct throughout the pandemic, both to highlight the systemic issues within our healthcare bureaucracy that must be fixed and to disincentivize other health officials from following in his footsteps. Since that time:

•Despite immense industry pushback, he was replaced with MAHA appointee Vinay Prasad

•Marks has made statements on the national media which display either a profound degree of ignorance of vaccines or a cult-like devotion to them, such as telling CBS the MMR vaccine absolutely does not cause encephalitis—despite this specific injury being one of the only vaccine injuries the Federal Government acknowledged as real and eligible for compensation when it created the the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986.
Note: the primary reason DMSO (a safe and affordable substance with remarkable therapeutic applications against a wide range of “incurable” ailments) never entered mainstream medical practice was because the FDA, feeling DMSO’s broad therapeutic potential threatened their control of American medicine, waged a multi-decade war against it despite widespread opposition from the public, Congressmen, scientists and physicians across the country. One journalist who interviewed the successive FDA commissioners throughout this saga was struck by how “lacking [they were] in solid information about the most spectacular and controversial drug of our time” and how often they simply quoted nonsensical misinformation the FDA had previously put out about the drug without a basic understanding of it—something I would argue also applies to Peter Marks.

•Yesterday, it was announced that Peter Marks had started working with Eli Lilly, where he will oversee molecule discovery and infectious diseases at Lilly. While his salary has not been publicly announced, the AI systems I queried said given the existing precedent, he would likely get 2-6 million this year (a big upgrade from his roughly $200,000.00 FDA salary)—and possibly much more (e.g. 10-15 million).

This understandably enraged the vaccine injured parties who directly interacted with Marks over the last four years, so I felt it was important to revisit exactly what Marks did and discuss the broader revolving door in regulatory medicine.

Note: last year, the FDA approved Eli Lilly’s anti-amyloid monoclonal antibody for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease (granting the application Fast Track, Priority Review, and Breakthrough Therapy designations). I showed in last weekend’s article, that these costly drugs do close to nothing (they may slightly slow the progression of Alzheimer’s disease) while simultaneously creating a variety of severe symptoms including giving over a quarter of recipients brain bleeds and brain swelling—yet remarkably, safer and much more effective Alzhemier’s therapies have languished in obscurity.