Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) ;) :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen: :geek: :ugeek:

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by tim » Mon Sep 08, 2025 3:34 pm

https://jkunadhasan.substack.com/cp/172677986
Letter to AG of Georgia highlighting details of the hidden vaccinated death from Georgia in the Pfizer Covid 19 Vaccine trial
https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/cp/172511315
Trump Questions If Operation Warp Speed 'Was as Brilliant as Many Say It Was'—Demands Big Pharma 'Justify the Success of Their Various COVID Drugs'

President Trump puts "brilliant" in quote marks when describing operation that brought COVID-19 shot to market, demands Pfizer and other drug makers release withheld data to the public.
President Donald J. Trump issued a fiery post on Truth Social this morning, calling on Pfizer and other pharmaceutical companies to publicly release their internal COVID-19 data and raising doubts about whether Operation Warp Speed was truly the triumph it has long been hailed as.

Trump’s words come immediately following my weekend report exposing (here) that Pfizer’s COVID-19 shot plasmids contain three human DNA sequences capable of integrating into the genome—blood, immune, and neurological control codes that match the very systems most often injured after vaccination.

The move also comes after Trump last month described Operation Warp Speed as an “incredible” accomplishment but stressed that it was “a long time ago” and that his team is now “looking for other answers” beyond mRNA shots—remarks that drew frantic backlash from pro-vaccine loyalists.

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by tim » Mon Sep 08, 2025 3:33 pm

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by tim » Mon Sep 08, 2025 3:32 pm

https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/ ... kin-cancer
UK: Gordon Ramsay has skin cancer; Chris Foreman (Madness) has multiple myeloma; DE: TV star Winnie Topp has second cancer; IN: TV anchor Rajesh Keshav in ICU after collapse on stage

CA: N.B. Premier Susan Holt back at work after brain cancer surgery; G-B: PM Braima Camara in Senegal hospital after mid-speech collapse; AU: cricket captain Michael Clarke has skin cancer again; more

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by tim » Mon Sep 08, 2025 3:26 pm

https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/why- ... -illnesses
Why Do Vaccines Cause the Illnesses They Prevent

Revealing The Forgotten Science of Vaccine Disease Provocation
Story at a Glance:

•Many people notice they appear to become ill with the disease they are being vaccinated against (e.g., the flu or COVID) after receiving a vaccine.

•While this association is frequently ridiculed by medical profession, over a century of evidence exists that demonstrates it occurred for a variety of diseases (e.g., there is extensive literature on it for typhoid fever, tuberculosis, and polio), to the point it was previously termed “disease provocation.”

•Unfortunately, since the knowledge of disease provocation would decrease vaccine sales, it tends to “vanish” from the medical profession’s memory, leading to almost identical debacles happening a few decades later that doctors at the time were “baffled by” (e.g., we discuss how this happened with polio).

•Disease provocation appears to be due to the immune system being diverted to targeting the vaccine’s antigen rather than doing it’s natural job. Since we frequently depend upon the immune system to control latent infections or recent ones currently in the incubation stage, that immunological diversion can lead to an existing infection spiraling out of control.

•In this article we review many examples of how this happened with infections in the past and highlight how this same process can cause vaccination to increase one’s risk of a severe flu infection, a severe COVID infection, a Lyme disease reactivation or a HPV infection progressing to cervical cancer.

Medicine is built around memorizing foundational axioms from which all other medical decisions and policies are made and any dissenting perspective is relentlessly ridiculed—despite the fact these axioms aren’t always correct. In the case of vaccines, to sustain their market, they have been presented as both “safe and effective,” leading to doctors frequently assuming anyone vaccinated for a disease cannot catch it and that any injuries occurring immediately after vaccination are unrelated coincidence—resulting in a frequent failure by physicians to diagnose either of these.

In turn, throughout my life, I have noticed more people than I can count (including groups of people) come down with the flu after they receive the flu vaccine. Whenever this is brought up in medical circles, the response typically is “correlation is not causation” and being lectured on the fact the injected influenza vaccine does not contain any live viruses so it can’t give you the flu.

More recently, I (and quite a few of my colleagues) noticed that this also happened with the COVID vaccine and more concerningly, we would come across cases where the person we knew not only got COVID but in some cases became severely ill, had to be hospitalized and then died. While this was understandably “denied,” I soon came across research from the adverse event reporting databases which showed that the two most common causes of death seen in association with the COVID-19 vaccines were heart issues (e.g., dying suddenly) and COVID-19, with the heart issues typically being clustering near the time of vaccination, while after a few weeks, the most commonly reported cause of death following a COVID-19 vaccine was…COVID-19.
Note: this is also shown in national trends of COVID-19 cases and deaths, as they tended to spike after vaccination campaigns were conducted.

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by Higgenbotham » Mon Sep 01, 2025 10:11 am

He (Robert F Kennedy Jr) hired David Geier, a promoter of the link (of vaccines to autism), to review CDC vaccine databases to study the issue, unsettling career CDC officials tasked with working with him.
Dan Jernigan, who helped oversee the CDC’s infectious-disease response, told The Post he quit in part because HHS was demanding Geier be given access to sensitive vaccine safety data as part of examining autism.

“What we see is a desire to go back and try and find those links that had been identified not to be there previously,” Jernigan said.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2 ... 381875178f

Nothing to see here! Move along!

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by tim » Fri Aug 29, 2025 7:43 am

https://jennasside.rocks/p/breaking-fda ... d-vaccines
BREAKING: FDA Approves New Covid Vaccines

Actually, they sort of destroyed the whole program. I just stole that headline—verbatim—from USA Today.
The truth is, what actually happened is almost the exact opposite. Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s FDA just revoked the Covid shots’ Emergency Use Authorization—the very magic wand that greenlit mandates, job losses, military purges, school expulsions, and the whole dystopian circus of the last four years. Finally, mercifully, the golden ticket for coercion has been run through the shredder.

Instead of sweeping recommendations that essentially include anyone with a pulse, now you must be over 65 or have at least one health condition to qualify for endless jabs. In other words, if you’re not frail or high-risk, the government is officially done forcing you to take one for the team.

I know. They’re still allowing poisonous cocktails to be given to the most fragile groups on earth. Tell me you’re keen on depopulating the planet without telling me you’re keen on depopulating the planet. But at least someone is trying to protect some of us.

Naturally, mainstream media rushed to spin this as great news for vaxaholics. “FDA APPROVES UPDATED COVID-19 SHOTS,” PBS bellowed, followed by a sheepish whisper in microscopic type: “…with some restrictions for kids and adults.” The same outlets that once hawked the jab as a granny-saving miracle are now straining to slap a smiley-face sticker on what is, in reality, a massive retreat.

“Parents will still be able to seek out shots from rival drugmaker Moderna, the other maker of mRNA vaccines, which has full FDA approval for children as young as 6 months,” PBS attempted to soothe, after having to break the tragic news to its readers that Pfizer’s vaccine will no longer be available for any child under five. “But the company’s Spikevax vaccine is only approved for children with at least one serious health problem.”
The American Academy of Pediatrics—who just two weeks ago issued their own vaccine guidance (in summary: every arm, every season, quit questioning) that differs from federal policy—moaned that the new limits “may block vaccine access for families who want to protect their children.” Imagine the horror: parents panicking because their healthy toddlers won’t be injected with an experimental gene therapy.

An epidemiologist at Brown even lamented that the changes might “make it harder for people to get vaccines.” Harder? It means you now have to talk to your doctor before you roll up your sleeve. Oh, the humanity.

Pfizer and Moderna, of course, rushed out press releases reminding us that yes, the juice is still flowing if grandma wants her Spikevax fix—because nothing says “science” like a quarterly earnings call.

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by tim » Tue Aug 26, 2025 11:06 am

https://www.malone.news/p/weaponizing-m ... on-to-bury
Weaponizing "Misinformation" to Bury Safety Concerns: A Response on RSV Monoclonal Antibodies
Yaffa Shir-Raz

The recent critique raises a number of claims regarding my article. This response addresses the substantive points directly, focusing solely on the evidence.

When evaluating new interventions for healthy newborns, presenting the full safety record – including every death – is not optional, it is a fundamental obligation. This is always true, but in the case of Merck’s clesrovimab it was especially critical: the FDA skipped presenting the product to its advisory committee on the grounds that it was "not first in class." This left ACIP as the only public forum charged with reviewing the product. Instead of two independent layers of oversight, there was only one. In such circumstances, withholding or downplaying deaths meant that ACIP – the sole safeguard – was not given the complete picture it needed to protect infants and families.

Before turning to the substantive issues, two clarifications are in order:

A large portion of the critique is devoted to personal ad hominem remarks. Such rhetoric does not honor the principles of scientific debate and is contrary to what science should represent. I will therefore not address these attacks further.

Some of the first claims in the critique actually concern an article by Dr. Maryanne Demasi, which I cited. Since I included them, I will clarify them briefly:

"The CDC split the age groups (0-37 days vs. 38 days-8 months) for sound epidemiological reasons, not to conceal a signal."
My article highlighted that the split erased statistical significance. A unified calculation shows a nearly four-fold increase in seizure risk, a signal that was never presented to ACIP. The split was not explained during the meeting, and it occurred exactly at the point when routine vaccinations begin. Even if additional vaccines are a confounder, that does not absolve the CDC of its obligation to present the combined analysis. An advisory committee deserves to see both the stratified and the pooled results.

"Pooling the two age groups is not epidemiologically valid."
I wrote explicitly that the problem lies in presenting only a single stratified analysis that removed the signal. Good pharmacovigilance practice requires sensitivity analyses, including pooled windows and alternative models. A pooled analysis is standard in post-marketing surveillance, and the CDC should have shown it as well.

Beyond the factual dispute, this argument demonstrates a methodological fallacy: it invokes epidemiological rigor selectively. The critic dismisses pooled safety analysis as "inappropriate" while ignoring that pooling is exactly the standard practice for rare adverse events. This selective deployment of rigor is itself unscientific. The same inconsistency appears in the treatment of confidence intervals: wide intervals do not make results meaningless; they mean large risks cannot be ruled out, which is precisely why transparency is required.

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by tim » Tue Aug 26, 2025 11:02 am

Higgenbotham wrote: Mon Aug 25, 2025 7:22 pm
Newsweek

RFK Jr. may roll back major achievement Donald Trump called "monumental"
Story by Nick Mordowanec

President Donald Trump and Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. are allegedly planning to ban the COVID vaccine "within months," years after Trump labeled the vaccine's development during the pandemic as a "monumental achievement," according to an associate of Kennedy's.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/ ... 32f2&ei=10
When the truth comes out and people realize what has been done, will this be the catalyst to the crisis?

The countless people who were mandated to get this injection or lose their livelihood and ability to provide for their families won't be happy when the knowledge becomes mainstream.

I once read that the Chernobyl Disaster in 1986 precipitated the collapse of the Soviet Union and the mRNA injections may be our "Chernobyl Disaster".

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by Higgenbotham » Mon Aug 25, 2025 7:22 pm

Newsweek

RFK Jr. may roll back major achievement Donald Trump called "monumental"
Story by Nick Mordowanec

President Donald Trump and Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. are allegedly planning to ban the COVID vaccine "within months," years after Trump labeled the vaccine's development during the pandemic as a "monumental achievement," according to an associate of Kennedy's.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/ ... 32f2&ei=10

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by Higgenbotham » Mon Aug 25, 2025 6:29 pm

Revamped CDC Panel Taps Covid Vaccine Critic to Lead Task Force
Story by Jessica Nix

(Bloomberg) -- An influential vaccine panel’s task force will be led by a member who has previously expressed distrust in the Covid vaccine, weeks after a shooting on the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was fueled by Covid misinformation.

Retsef Levi, an operations professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, will lead the Covid-19 immunization task force, a spokesperson for Health and Human Services confirmed without offering additional comment. Levi has previously said the Covid shots should be removed from the market and has called the safety of mRNA shots into question.

“The evidence is mounting and indisputable that MRNA vaccines cause serious harm including death, especially among young people. We have to stop giving them immediately!” Levi posted on X in January 2023.

Levi was appointed to the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, or ACIP, in June during an overhaul of the panel. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. fired all 17 members, citing high levels of conflicts of interest, and replaced them with seven members, many of which are vaccine critics.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/ ... ffcc&ei=15

Top