Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) ;) :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen: :geek: :ugeek:

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by tim » Sun Aug 03, 2025 10:39 am

https://pierrekorymedicalmusings.com/p/ ... -again-how
Surgical intervention? Oh %$#! no. Although I mentioned my nosocomephobia above, I actually have a “dual diagnosis” in that I also now suffer from “iatrophobia” (fear of doctors).

Iatrophobia, an extreme and overwhelming fear of doctors, can prevent individuals from seeking necessary medical care, including vaccinations, check-ups, and other routine care. This condition can negatively impact a person's health by delaying essential treatments and preventive measures (you don’t say). People with iatrophobia may experience anxiety before a doctor's appointment, which can be so severe that it stops them from attending (yup). Common reasons for this fear include the anticipation of painful procedures, anxiety over potential diagnoses, mistrust of medical professionals (ED: nailed it), and embarrassment about health issues.

The latter condition has been severely worsened in the wake of my recent medical record reviews - the Texas girls who did not die of measles, the twin Idaho infants who died simultaneously in their bed after being vaccinated, and the New York baby who died 12 hours after receiving 12 vaccines in one visit to “catch up.”

Although I wrote about the above cases publicly in the past month, what my readers don’t know is that my iatrophobia was further compounded just last week when I was hired to serve as an expert reviewer on a a case of a healthy man in his 50s who died of horrifically neglectful medical care (again, missed bacterial pneumonias while he was hospitalized for Covid). That case was the most disturbing because the grossly incompetent care appeared heavily influenced (could see it in the documentation) by a severe bias and lack of empathy, driven by his unvaccinated status for Covid.

Although I should be clear, my fear is not of all doctors, but mostly the “system” ones that are trained by pharma-ganda curricula and then work for massive institutions within corporate health systems governed by rapacious insurance companies and uncaring, captured governmental agency heads.

Those physicians were among the most propagandized citizens in our society, and thus their behavior was some of the most alarming. Conversely, I am much more of a fan of private practice docs and those from non-pure allopathic disciplines like integrative, functional, osteopathic, naturopathic, homeopathic, chiropractic, etc. (note they were not immune from propaganda either but given their backgrounds and experience, had a generally higher level of immunity to it than the allopaths).

Iatrophobia Or Fury Over The Implosion of Biomedical Ethics In Covid?

Is it really fear that I have less than a simple, unremitting anger and resentment from watching my profession ( a field I have devoted my adult life to) so rapidly (and easily) implode?

Biomedical ethics, once the bedrock of my field, was quickly eroded, its collapse first ignited by the sudden and ruthless imposition of lockdowns and the shuttering of small businesses. Those measures orchestrated the largest wealth transfer in history, stripping the “little people” of their livelihoods while funneling obscene riches to mega-corporations and global elites. What began as economic devastation morphed into a grotesque assault on truth itself, as prestigious medical journals churned out corrupted trials, peddling scientific lies to prop up deranged public health policies devoid of reason or an honest analysis of the totality of scientific evidence.

Those policies—suppression of effective early treatments with off-label medications, enforced mask-wearing, social distancing, and coerced mass “vaccination”—were not born of science but of tyranny, buttressed by a relentless cacophony of propaganda from corporate journalists and complicit politicians and public health authorities worldwide. Colluding media and social media giants, bought or bullied by captured government agencies, unleashed mass censorship to silence dissent, ensuring the public swallowed a grotesque and toxic brew of lies.

The cost? Countless preventable deaths from untreated illness, compounded exponentially by the forced inoculation of billions with a barely tested, lethal gene therapy masquerading as a vaccine. Its aftermath festers still: declining life expectancy, skyrocketing cancer rates, sudden deaths of the young, plunging fertility rates, and a tidal wave of chronic and acute disabilities ravaging lives. This was no accident—it was a crime against humanity, orchestrated by a system that forsook its duty to heal. Is it any wonder I refuse to trust a “system doc” who was complicit in this catastrophe? My rage is not just personal; it’s a call for justice against a profession—and a world—betrayed.

Whoa, where did that come from? As they say, “forgive me for I digress.” Let’s get back to my personal case report. Sorry, folks, given its nature, I am just sharing it with my paid subscribers.

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by tim » Sun Aug 03, 2025 10:09 am

https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/f ... whistle-on
Funeral Director Blows Whistle on Horrifying Covid ‘Vaccine’ Cover-Up

A funeral director has blown the whistle to expose an alarming cover-up of the rising number of “white fibrous clots” being found in the corpses of people who received Covid mRNA “vaccines.”
https://www.thefocalpoints.com/cp/169758673
After COVID-19 Vaccine Blood Clots, Deion Sanders Hit with Turbo Cancer

Unusual Aggressive Bladder Cancer Reported During Pandemic in Literature
We covered former Dallas Cowboy superstar Deion Sanders and his horrific experience with vaccine blood clots earlier in the pandemic. Now it was reported that Sanders, who must of had very good health care with imaging and urine tests, developed a rapidly moving high grade bladder cancer with removal of his entire bladder. I have never seen this in my practice in a 57-year old man

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by tim » Sun Aug 03, 2025 10:08 am

https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/n ... id-vaccine
Norway’s 54-Year-Old COVID Vaccine Rollout Czar DIES SUDDENLY

Are Stuwitz Berg, a respected pediatrician and senior official at Norway’s Institute of Public Health, who lead the nation’s COVID-19 vaccination roll out, has died suddenly at just 54 years old
Are Stuwitz Berg, a respected pediatrician and senior official at Norway’s Institute of Public Health, who led the nation’s COVID-19 vaccination roll out, has died suddenly at just 54 years old—adding to a growing list of high-profile figures linked to the vaccine rollout whose unexpected deaths continue to raise eyebrows.

Berg served as chief physician and department director at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health (FHI), where he oversaw infection control and vaccination efforts during the pandemic.

He also became a famous face in Norway for his frequent TV appearances reassuring the public about the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines—particularly as Norway rolled out mass immunization campaigns in 2021 and 2022.

Described by his colleagues as “a unique and present leader” and “a highly respected” professional, Berg’s passing has left many in the Norwegian health community stunned.

Mainstream outlets have yet to report a cause of death, though they emphasize his kindness, humor, and commitment to science. But some observers are asking a different question: Why are so many young and middle-aged architects of the COVID response dying unexpectedly?

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by tim » Sun Aug 03, 2025 10:04 am

https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what ... ines-teach
When you study history, it’s always striking how frequently dysfunctional cycles tend to repeat themselves—which is why many of us were able to foresee much of what came to pass with the disastrous COVID-19 vaccines. Medicine has its fair share of erroneous beliefs (which frequently have little to no evidence supporting them). Sadly, my profession has held tightly onto them for centuries regardless of the problems those beliefs create and I believe the vaccination meme is one of the most harmful ones.

As all of this began with the smallpox vaccines which “ended” the scourge of smallpox, I believe it’s critical to review exactly what actually happened as:

•The mythology of the smallpox vaccines has served as the justification for all the other vaccination atrocities which followed.

•Many issues emerged during that campaign (resulting in immense public backlash) which are almost identical to what we’ve seen again and again since then (including throughout COVID-19). As such, to break this dysfunctional cycle which has consumed our culture, it is critical to understand what’s actually happened.

•I believe the smallpox vaccines served as an inflection point in humanity’s health, as after them, an era of chronic illness (particularly autoimmune and neurologic ones) began which has continued to increase ever since. In fact, many of the unusual complications of the COVID-19 vaccines are very similar to what was observed from the smallpox vaccine over a century ago.

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by tim » Thu Jul 31, 2025 10:56 am

https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/ ... 21-28-2025
Seven teenagers “died suddenly”:

An update to our April report:
12 “died suddenly” in or around the waters:

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by tim » Thu Jul 31, 2025 10:52 am

https://pierrekorymedicalmusings.com/p/ ... infectious
The Elephant In the Room

OK, let’s (finally) address the elephant in the room, which is that the most significant cause (but not the only) of unprecedented and sudden rises in infectious illnesses around the world is the likelihood that the planet’s citizens are suffering from widespread immune dysregulation in the wake of the global mRNA vaccination campaign. There, I said it.

At least, that’s my hypothesis. Part of the evidence I will use to support this assertion comes straight from the article (in a surprising twist, the explanation was literally right under their noses yet they couldn’t sniff it out). Check out the following paragraphs which, to me, are unintentionally comical:

The Biggest Risk: Canada, Japan, Singapore and Germany — places lauded for their successful efforts to contain Covid — are now seeing unusual levels of excess mortality, said Christopher Murray, Washington-based director of the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation.

“Lauded for their successful efforts to contain Covid?” Meaning.. mass mandated vaccination? And, lo and behold, they are now seeing “unusual levels of excess mortality?” Weird, right? Seems to support my “vaccine hypothesis” above no? With one caveat - although in this article I will focus on the negative immunological impacts of vaccines, I would argue that the excess mortality they cite above is more from the cardiovascular and endothelial damage of the mRNA spike vaccines. This can be seen in the data showing that during the pandemic, there were significant increases in strokes, heart attacks, and sudden deaths, especially in young people. Associated with a respiratory virus. Go figure.

Surprisingly, they make the vaccine hypothesis even stronger with the next sentence:

“In contrast, places that failed to control the spread of Covid, like Bulgaria, Romania and Russia, are now back to pre-pandemic mortality rates.”

Murray then makes a lame attempt to explain this seeming contradiction:

Why would it be worse in places that did a good job? That seems a bit strange. (ED: not really Doug). Some of this is the idea that those countries kept frail, elderly people alive,” Murray said. Mixed with the immunity debt theory, “it’s a really quite complicated set of things going on,” he said.

You have just got to be kidding me here. They are making my argument for me. Doesn’t happen often, but I’ll take it. Yeesh.

So, their best explanation is that the “best performing countries” in Covid (an oxymoron, obviously) managed to keep the frail elderly alive longer, and that is why we are seeing new excess mortality. “Mortality debt?” Hmm. Good one.

Not-So-Fun Facts About Vaccination and Immune Dysregulation
So, in the above list of “differential diagnoses” generated to explain the surges in illness, the Bloomberg journalists never entertained the possibility that the negative immunological consequences of mass vaccination with an experimental gene technology might be a cause. Oddly, they didn’t even explore the less politically charged (and much more obvious) possibility that patients who recover from Covid-19 itself can exhibit alterations in immune function.

Let’s start with vaccines. A little-known fact is that vaccines, even when they reduce the rate of the targeted infection, are also known to simultaneously increase the risk of other respiratory infections (thus creating a zero- and/or negative-sum game). Don’t believe me? Here ya go (heading is hyperlinked to the study):

Randomized Controlled Trial in Children (2012, Hong Kong):

Flu-vaccinated kids had over 4X the risk of non-influenza respiratory virus infection (rhinoviruses, coxsackie, echoviruses).

Australian Case-Control Study in Children:

Seasonal flu shots doubled the risk of illness from non-influenza virus infections. Overall, the vaccine increased the risk of virus-associated acute respiratory illness by 73%.

In this study comparing VA clinics that mandated flu vaccines to those that did not, even though flu infections decreased markedly, other respiratory infections increased by 26%.

Mechanisms Supporting Immune Dysregulation Caused by mRNA Gene Therapies
Recall that the spike protein is the primary pathogenic factor of the virus. The spike protein generated by mRNA vaccination has been shown to lead to the following immunologic disturbances (headings are hyperlinked to the study). The spike protein:

1. Induces High IgG4 Antibody Levels which promote an immune environment less focused on pathogen elimination.

2. Impairs T Cell Activation which are critical for fighting a broad range of infections

3. Suppresses Innate Immune Responses which is essential for the initial defense against many pathogens

4.Causes inflammation - spike protein triggers both increased inflammatory signals or molecular mimicry, leading to immune dysregulation and autoimmunity.

Spikeopathy

This review by Parry et al (a respected Australian psychiatrist and colleague whose scholarly work exposed numerous research integrity problems in SSRI trials) first coined and described the field of "spikeopathy." The term is used to describe the collection of autoimmune, cardiovascular, neurological, and possible oncological impacts linked to the spike protein, which they expertly and comprehensively detailed in their review.

Mechanisms include inflammation, autoimmunity, altered immune responses, and widespread biodistribution of the spike protein along with cross-reactive responses - antibodies generated by mRNA vaccines can cross-react with other pathogens, which could, in theory, also distract or suppress the immune response to other organisms.

The “Inconvenient Science” Problem: How Medical Literature Gets Neutered
What could be more inconvenient to the vaccine industry than the knowledge that vaccination might, paradoxically, actually lead to an overall increase in infectious illnesses? Nothing could be more threatening, really (well, except for the knowledge they cause death I suppose) - which is why Bloomberg carefully (or ignorantly) avoided exploring the possibility.

My readers are, by now, all well aware that when “inconvenient science” emerges, “disinformation campaigns” are deployed via peer-reviewed studies in medical journals, which are then amplified by the media to suppress or neutralize the findings. Whenever a scientific finding threatens entrenched financial interests—or doesn’t fit the preferred narrative—you can bet a flurry of “debunking” studies will follow, with designs engineered to neutralize the original results. All the “other side” has to do is publish conflicting or contradictory data to render the previous finding “controversial, conflicting, and/or inconclusive.” Easy Peezy.

I have hammered this concept home repeatedly in this Substack and my book called “The War on Ivermectin.” Note that the Hong Kong study I cited above was a prospective RCT, published in 2012, which found that kids who got the flu vaccine had a 4X increased rate of other viral illnesses compared to those who didn’t. 4X.

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by tim » Thu Jul 31, 2025 10:43 am

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defe ... 201-covid/
UK Reveals New Details of Upcoming Pandemic Exercise Similar to Event 201 That Preceded COVID

Exercise Pegasus — the U.K.’s largest pandemic response exercise in history — aims to “help to safeguard our citizens,” but critics worry the plan is just a way to exert control through greater surveillance.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mi_eWnMGYeA&t=4s
The UK is quietly preparing for another pandemic—with the largest national drill in its history and new WHO treaty obligations that could lock us into permanent emergency powers. I unpack what this really means: the rise of unelected global control, the role of DARPA and AI-driven simulations, and how governments use boredom and bureaucracy to bury tyranny in plain sight. Trump and RFK Jr. may have pulled the U.S. out of the WHO—but in the UK, your sovereignty is being handed away.

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by tim » Thu Jul 31, 2025 10:42 am

https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/peter-hot ... er-heavily
Peter Hotez PANICS After Heavily-Vaxxed Caller Reveals “Worst Experience Ever” Post-Booster

This is like watching a train wreck in real time.
What happened next is one of the most shameless displays of gaslighting you’ll ever witness.

A caller named Carol, who says she keeps up with her boosters, asked Hotez over the phone why she suffered the “worst experience [she] ever had” just two days after her last COVID shot.

It was one of those moments where you want to yell at the screen but know it won’t help.

Carol described how she was so exhausted she was sleeping 16 hours a day, and had a “really bad cough with deep phlegm.”

At first, Hotez assumed she’d had a severe case of COVID. But to his shock, Carol told him she had NEVER had COVID.

Hotez scrambled for an explanation:

“Now, one possibility is, unfortunately, that it can take a couple of weeks for the booster to kick in. So, what possibly could have happened is in between the time you got the booster and the immune response kicks in, you could have gotten some intercurrent viral infection, such as Covid or flu or a gazillion other things. So sometimes it’s hard to know what’s ascribed to a SIDE EFFECT of the vaccine versus some other intercurrent illness.”

Notice that in the last line, Hotez says the quiet part out loud: “side effect.”

He realizes: “Oh, sh*t, this could be a vaccine-injured person.”

But instead of acknowledging that possibility, he spins an explanation to confuse her into thinking the symptoms could have come from something else—just two days after the shot.

Just watch the clip. It’s never the jab with these people.

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by tim » Thu Jul 31, 2025 10:39 am

https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/rfk-jr-dr ... ew-vaccine
RFK Jr. Drops Stunning New Vaccine Announcement

It’s finally happening. This changes everything.
Before becoming HHS Secretary, Kennedy exposed how vaccine manufacturers were being hammered with lawsuits due to injuries.

One of the largest manufacturers at the time, Wyeth (now part of Pfizer), reportedly told President Reagan: give us legal protection or we’ll stop making vaccines.

Reagan’s response? Why not just make safer vaccines?

Wyeth’s answer: Vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe.”

That phrase—“unavoidably unsafe”—would later appear in a Supreme Court decision and reflects the legal premise that some vaccine injuries are inevitable.

“And so, anybody who tells you vaccines are safe and effective, the industry itself got immunity from liability by convincing the President and Congress that vaccines are unavoidably unsafe,” Kennedy previously stated.

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by tim » Sun Jul 20, 2025 10:16 pm

https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/ ... -7-14-2025
In memory of those who “died suddenly” in the United States and worldwide, July 7-14, 2025

Actor James Carter Cathcart; TV writer David Flebotte; filmmaker Tom Neuwirth; keyboardist David Kaff (Spinal Tap); footballer Luis Sharpe; hoopster Ryan Reid (38); bull rider Spud Jones (36); & more
A survey of the likely global toll of COVID "vaccination," based on the reports collected by our worldwide team of researchers this past week.
Lawrence Butts
3d
Edited

I understand. But peaks are only part of the picture here (in my mind). Peaks are assumed to be attributable to deaths from the vaccine. It is my guess that excess mortality will continue to rise to new extremely high levels as the months and years pass. The turbo cancers that we are starting to see now (2 to 3 years after injectioins), would not be attributed to the vaccination. So it appears to me that we will have a massive population decline with the continued rise in excess deaths and the declining birth rates. And we have not even factored in, a highly evolved immune escape virus, that will kill immune compromised humans by the millions. I think we could easily have a billion deaths worldwide. My god I hope I am wrong. Heaven help us, if I am right!

Like (3)
Reply (1)
Share
Sanjoy Mahajan
3d

I agree with you about the peaks and Rancourt's analysis. For that reason, that the peak-based analysis cannot see long-term vaccine-caused deaths, I think that the method underestimates the total deaths.

Like (2)
Reply (2)
Share
Lawrence Butts
2d

Check out this link of death numbers - wow! https://open.substack.com/pub/emeralddb ... m_medium=i

Like (3)
Reply
Share
Lawrence Butts
3d

I agree. This is a bell curve of death that we have just begun to ascend toward a peak level die-off. We have 200 million Americans who have been injected with this poison. How many will be left when travel first up and then down this bell curve of death? I think we are talking about a mass extinction-like event here. I hope I am wrong.
AnnR
4d

So, I read these weekly reports, and I realized today that "they" won their depopulation battle. The die is cast, the deed is done. We can scream, shriek, and rent our clothes but it doesn't really matter as it relates to their objective. They frigging succeeded and they don't care if they get called to account. And all we can do is continue to fight and try to open people's eyes, even if half the population is destroyed in the next decade.

Top