Generational Dynamics Forum - New Site

FullMoon wrote: Thu Jul 24, 2025 12:11 pm You said once that the use and proliferation of plastics was a mistake and it seems the chemical industry has done well but we and our proginy will surely suffer for several generations.

Higgenbotham wrote: Thu Jul 24, 2025 10:38 am

Actor Jeff Daniels laments Kamala Harris’ loss, suggests she would have governed like Abraham Lincoln

https://www.foxnews.com/media/actor-jef ... am-lincoln

No, she would have governed like Lincoln's dog Fido.

Actor Jeff Daniels laments Kamala Harris’ loss, suggests she would have governed like Abraham Lincoln

Higgenbotham wrote: Wed Jul 23, 2025 1:01 pm Ogallala Aquifer Could Dry Up in 20 Years—Yet It’s Rarely Discussed
https://climatecosmos.com/climate-news/ ... discussed/

Florida Citrus Production Falls to Lowest Level Since 1919
https://centralflorida.substack.com/i/1 ... evel-since

States of emergency, agricultural disaster declared in parts of drought-stricken Manitoba
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba ... -1.7588473

This is the summer of flooding across the US, and scientists know why
https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/20/climate/ ... f-flooding

Extreme weather caused by climate change is raising food prices worldwide, study says
https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/21/business ... hange-intl

FullMoon wrote: Tue Jul 22, 2025 1:44 pm https://youtu.be/wom8kSdgmVs?si=fYni1l_jD7BAnuQM
This Martin Armstrong interview was the most informative I've heard from him maybe ever. Looks like huge change is upon us. We knew it was coming and that it was getting closer.

"Plan On It!" Martin Armstrong Sees '100% Chance Of Nuclear War'

by Tyler Durden
Monday, Jul 21, 2025 - 06:20 AM
Via Greg Hunter’s USAWatchdog.com,

Six weeks ago, legendary financial and geopolitical cycle analyst Martin Armstrong was signaling a big turn toward war.

Now, Armstrong says, “The chances of war with a nuclear exchange is at 100%. . .. Plan on it, this is coming.”

Vice President JD Vance launched a withering critique of Microsoft on Wednesday, accusing the tech giant of letting go of American workers while relying heavily on immigrant labor through the H-1B visa program.

Speaking at a bipartisan event co-hosted by the Hill and Valley Forum, Vance questioned the ethics and economic logic behind mass layoffs followed by increased applications for employment-based visas.

"You see some big tech companies where they'll lay off 9,000 workers, and then they'll apply for a bunch of overseas visas. And I sort of wonder; that doesn't totally make sense to me.

"That displacement and that math worries me a bit. And what the president has said, he said very clearly: We want the very best and the brightest to make America their home. We want them to build great companies and so forth. But I don't want companies to fire 9,000 American workers and then to go and say, 'We can't find workers here in America.' That's a bullshit story."

Barack Obama’s office said Trump’s ‘bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction’.

Good morning.

Barack Obama has broken his silence on Donald Trump’s calls to prosecute him, unequivocally rejecting his successor’s accusations that he tried to engineer a “coup” after Trump’s 2016 election victory by “manufacturing” evidence of Russian interference.

Obama’s office took the unusual step of issuing an emphatic refutation after Trump told reporters his predecessor had tried to “lead a coup” against him and was guilty of “treason” over intelligence assessments suggesting that Russia had intervened to help defeat Hillary Clinton in the campaign.

“Out of respect for the office of the presidency, our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response,” the statement said. “But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one. These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction.”

What else did the statement say? It went on to criticize claims made in an 11-page document released last week by Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence. It said: “Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes. These findings were affirmed in a 2020 report by the bipartisan senate Intelligence Committee, led by then Chairman Marco Rubio.”