by Phong Tran » Tue Mar 03, 2026 9:53 am
Sharing a link from Professor Jiang in relations to his Game Theory of the US/Israel - Iran War. I enjoy watching his 'theories' because they're probably about as neutral as one can be, and he makes connections that haven't been made apparent in other places.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jIS2eB-rGv0
Starting around the 30mins mark, he makes a couple connections that I found interesting.
1. The US-Israel attacking Iran and the Middle East creates an energy catalyst for Europe that will force them to side with the US to ensure their future energy supply, whether they want to or not (ie. securing US interests).
2. The term Blue Gold, which has been floating around conspiracy theorists forums for a while as a dystopian future world could actually be the US' game plan in the Middle East, as the ME countries utilize more water then their environments can produce (which is why Iran is attacking water desalination stations of puppet ME countries)
3. Iran's possible geopolitical strategy of galvanizing Shia population in other countries to protest and cause an uprising with Israel and US as their enemies, eventually escalating towards a Shia/Sunni Muslim Jihad with Iran as the center of the Islamic Caliphate (which could coincide with John's prediction of the Clash of Civilizations). This could cause massive internal civic issues in many European and western countries due to immigration of Muslims who may answer the call to Jihad.
However, I remember that John mentioned that Iran's generation was an awakening one and that they would be on the side of US against China in the Clash of Civilizations war and maybe they will be, but maybe they aren't initially just like the USSR wasn't on the side of the allies in WWII.
In regards to the belief that the US will come out on top, I'm not sure that will be the case. I believe it ends because humanity is pushed to the point where if country A goes any further against country B that Nuclear War would be the only answer, and at that point, both sides agree to just end the war. The US will be like how Great Britain was, starting their decline, while China, having suffered as well, but not having as many immigration issues, thus having a more cohesive population, will accelerate faster to becoming the next century superpower.
Sharing a link from Professor Jiang in relations to his Game Theory of the US/Israel - Iran War. I enjoy watching his 'theories' because they're probably about as neutral as one can be, and he makes connections that haven't been made apparent in other places.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jIS2eB-rGv0
Starting around the 30mins mark, he makes a couple connections that I found interesting.
1. The US-Israel attacking Iran and the Middle East creates an energy catalyst for Europe that will force them to side with the US to ensure their future energy supply, whether they want to or not (ie. securing US interests).
2. The term Blue Gold, which has been floating around conspiracy theorists forums for a while as a dystopian future world could actually be the US' game plan in the Middle East, as the ME countries utilize more water then their environments can produce (which is why Iran is attacking water desalination stations of puppet ME countries)
3. Iran's possible geopolitical strategy of galvanizing Shia population in other countries to protest and cause an uprising with Israel and US as their enemies, eventually escalating towards a Shia/Sunni Muslim Jihad with Iran as the center of the Islamic Caliphate (which could coincide with John's prediction of the Clash of Civilizations). This could cause massive internal civic issues in many European and western countries due to immigration of Muslims who may answer the call to Jihad.
However, I remember that John mentioned that Iran's generation was an awakening one and that they would be on the side of US against China in the Clash of Civilizations war and maybe they will be, but maybe they aren't initially just like the USSR wasn't on the side of the allies in WWII.
In regards to the belief that the US will come out on top, I'm not sure that will be the case. I believe it ends because humanity is pushed to the point where if country A goes any further against country B that Nuclear War would be the only answer, and at that point, both sides agree to just end the war. The US will be like how Great Britain was, starting their decline, while China, having suffered as well, but not having as many immigration issues, thus having a more cohesive population, will accelerate faster to becoming the next century superpower.