Generational Dynamics World View News

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) ;) :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen: :geek: :ugeek:

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Generational Dynamics World View News

Re: Generational Dynamics World View News

by Phong Tran » Thu Mar 05, 2026 4:01 pm

In regards to the United States of America, John had last updated the country generation as 1984 to Present (Unraveling Era). Do we know when that period has ended and when it's Crisis Era had started? That may help us figure out when the next transition from Crisis to Recovery Era would occur.

I remember reading or watching someone who made a very interesting point, I can't remember the source, but I guess consideration of the message may be more important then who brought it up. That Trump's attack on Iran was a big hit to his MAGA base, as when he was campaigning, he made it seem like he was tired of foreign wars and would keep the US away from such entanglements. If one were to look at that betrayal at it's simplest principle, outside of left-right politics, whether it needed to be done, etc..., it really starts to open the question of whether Representative Democracy truly exists in the United States? Trump neither went to the senate or congress or the American public to determine if his course of action was supported by the people. And if true Representative Democracy doesn't exist, then what form of Government does the United States have? As I don't know enough about the Executive Powers of the President, I can't really say what is within their rights or not, but from the general layman's perspective, I'm sure it continues to show the hypocrisy of campaigning with certain promises and then disregarding those same promises once the politician is in office.

In the fourth turning, the Hero generation is the one supposed to rise to the occasion during the Crisis Era; I'm not sure how closely John's generational dynamics theory correlated with fourth turning theory, but if that's the case, the Millenials' will be the Hero generation in this period. That's the generation that understands that the system is corrupt and broken, that no longer believe in the American Dream and that working harder will lead to a fulfilling life. While most of them are not nihilistic, there is a true apathy toward the system. I guess I'm not quite sure that an external conflict against the US will re-patriotize the American population the same way the attack on Pearl Harbor did for WWII. It doesn't remove the internal corruption, and defending, fighting and dying for that corrupted system won't make sense for the Hero generation. However, a civil war during the Crisis Era of US could most certainly create a polarizing "regeneracy" as that drive to root the current corruption out and to rebuild the American Idea would be one that many Millenials' could probably get behind. Just some thoughts and nothing new really, but as things are changing so fast, bringing back up the topic as a future possibility.

Re: Generational Dynamics World View News

by Fullmoonn » Thu Mar 05, 2026 1:01 pm

So in other words, they'll lose their nerve, and ignore everything their own conclusions about Washington, when worst comes to worst?
But we have to realize that the founders understood that enemies were both foreign AND domestic. The groups who'd like to destroy our country for religious reasons ARE what should be defined as domestic enemy. . In the same camp as the foreign agents and enemies as well as other (less dangerous) domestic elements. Our government has been hijacked and the reality is too crazy for most normal to understand. But that doesn't mean that they're against their fellow citizens and lacking the desire to help make a better world. The hidden nature and motivation behind our national destruction is now rather easy to see because they stand behind government agencies and say it openly. In this regard it looks like the end times, because they'll force it down our throats.

Re: Generational Dynamics World View News

by Fullmoonn » Thu Mar 05, 2026 12:10 pm

So in other words, they'll lose their nerve, and ignore everything their own conclusions about Washington, when worst comes to worst?
In other words ...
There's lots and lots of people who aren't as dialed in as you are. When the "regeneracy"(aa John named it) event comes (probably a false flag domestically think nine eleven) the young,. who are socially mindful and wants to help others, will band together for mutual self preservation against something threatening. I think that's the basic premise of a recurring historical pattern that's been observed. It's not that they'll all of a sudden start to love the satanic pedophiles trying to destroy the world, but rather that they will band together with other people for collective and down to earth reasons. It seems they'd rather be happy with such a thing because we can see clearly how dystopian and corrupt the conditions have become.

Re: War with Iran

by DaKardii » Thu Mar 05, 2026 11:27 am

FullMoon wrote: Thu Mar 05, 2026 9:43 am
DaKardii wrote: Thu Mar 05, 2026 1:35 am
Navigator wrote: Tue Mar 03, 2026 11:55 pmBUT, when America itself is attacked, the majority (if not vast majority) rally to the flag and live up to the expectations of their forefathers. The US Constitution is still valid, and still the best form of government on earth.
I don't see that happening this time. Especially after the Epstein files were released.

Much of the left now sees Washington as irredeemably racist/sexist/homophobic/transphobic, while a growing contingent of the right now sees Washington as irredeemably degenerate if not Satanic.

They refuse to believe anything Washington says about who are our allies and who are our enemies. And if we do get attacked, they will blame Washington for provoking the attack.

Because in their opinion, no government is worse than Washington. And they would rather live under a (relatively) moral dictatorship than under an immoral democracy.
I was thinking about the truth of what you've stated but I'm not young and can't imagine how we've come to this reality. When I was younger, Iraq war was based upon obvious lies but everyone was gung ho to go kill people. Because of bloodlust.
The youth of today didn't grow up with Rambo as an idol like we did.
You're probably a bit exaggerating the hatred of the degenerate condition of the government and underestimating the willingness of the young to join a fight once the catalyst threshold has been reached. We shouldn't underestimate the inability of people to learn lessons from the past and repeating patterns, no matter how dumb, is preferred by most than changing and learning. . John used to lament this fact.
So in other words, they'll lose their nerve, and ignore everything their own conclusions about Washington, when worst comes to worst?

Re: War with Iran

by FullMoon » Thu Mar 05, 2026 9:43 am

DaKardii wrote: Thu Mar 05, 2026 1:35 am
Navigator wrote: Tue Mar 03, 2026 11:55 pmBUT, when America itself is attacked, the majority (if not vast majority) rally to the flag and live up to the expectations of their forefathers. The US Constitution is still valid, and still the best form of government on earth.
I don't see that happening this time. Especially after the Epstein files were released.

Much of the left now sees Washington as irredeemably racist/sexist/homophobic/transphobic, while a growing contingent of the right now sees Washington as irredeemably degenerate if not Satanic.

They refuse to believe anything Washington says about who are our allies and who are our enemies. And if we do get attacked, they will blame Washington for provoking the attack.

Because in their opinion, no government is worse than Washington. And they would rather live under a (relatively) moral dictatorship than under an immoral democracy.
I was thinking about the truth of what you've stated but I'm not young and can't imagine how we've come to this reality. When I was younger, Iraq war was based upon obvious lies but everyone was gung ho to go kill people. Because of bloodlust.
The youth of today didn't grow up with Rambo as an idol like we did.
You're probably a bit exaggerating the hatred of the degenerate condition of the government and underestimating the willingness of the young to join a fight once the catalyst threshold has been reached. We shouldn't underestimate the inability of people to learn lessons from the past and repeating patterns, no matter how dumb, is preferred by most than changing and learning. . John used to lament this fact.

Re: Why Iran

by FullMoon » Thu Mar 05, 2026 9:34 am

Navigator wrote: Wed Mar 04, 2026 3:04 pm The threat Iran poses is in getting nuclear weapons. Trump bombed them last year to try and prevent this. When we saw that they were trying to rebuild what we had bombed, and even refused our offer to provide them with enriched uranium if they stopped trying to enrich it themselves, we could see that they were hell-bent on getting a nuke.

No one needs a nuclear weapon armed Iranian Ayatollah. That's what we are trying to prevent. IMHO it is in the nick of time.
It doesn't matter if you "believe" this lie. It's categorically been shown to be a hox since they started saying it many decades ago. Ye, the criminally insane psychopath in charge of the theocracy that we love to die for has been barking this refrain since the Iraq war.
John used to be quite depressed because humans really are easily fooled and continued to follow patterns of hatted and
Violence. We can see how much more degenerate we've become since the Iraq war... The falsehoods and lies used as pretext at least were legitimized by a theater and in a democratic fashion. This war has been based upon a shifting set of reasons, none of which has been legitimatized.
Why not tell the truth about the reasons? Because nobody would agree to it.

Re: War with Iran

by DaKardii » Thu Mar 05, 2026 1:35 am

Navigator wrote: Tue Mar 03, 2026 11:55 pmBUT, when America itself is attacked, the majority (if not vast majority) rally to the flag and live up to the expectations of their forefathers. The US Constitution is still valid, and still the best form of government on earth.
I don't see that happening this time. Especially after the Epstein files were released.

Much of the left now sees Washington as irredeemably racist/sexist/homophobic/transphobic, while a growing contingent of the right now sees Washington as irredeemably degenerate if not Satanic.

They refuse to believe anything Washington says about who are our allies and who are our enemies. And if we do get attacked, they will blame Washington for provoking the attack.

Because in their opinion, no government is worse than Washington. And they would rather live under a (relatively) moral dictatorship than under an immoral democracy.

Why Iran

by Navigator » Wed Mar 04, 2026 3:04 pm

The threat Iran poses is in getting nuclear weapons. Trump bombed them last year to try and prevent this. When we saw that they were trying to rebuild what we had bombed, and even refused our offer to provide them with enriched uranium if they stopped trying to enrich it themselves, we could see that they were hell-bent on getting a nuke.

No one needs a nuclear weapon armed Iranian Ayatollah. That's what we are trying to prevent. IMHO it is in the nick of time.

Re: Generational Dynamics World View News

by Fullmoonn » Wed Mar 04, 2026 12:07 am

BUT, when America itself is attacked, the majority (if not vast majority) rally to the flag and live up to the expectations of their forefathers. The US Constitution is still valid, and still the best form of government on earth.[/quotei agree with this as most probably happens.
All the other stuff about Iran is... Like before with Russia.
What's going on and who's the special interest?
Nothing anywhere has shown Persian's a threat.. just saying

Re: War with Iran

by Navigator » Tue Mar 03, 2026 11:55 pm

DaKardii wrote: Tue Mar 03, 2026 12:08 am
How can we win this war when a large percentage of our population sees our government as irredeemable, and not worth defending? The short answer is, we can't. So how should our government respond?
I don't see the government as irredeemable. I do see a LOT of bad actors in government, but the system itself is still working.

There will be a lot of anti-government sentiment as the war with Iran drags on. And it has all the earmarks of dragging on.

Experience has shown that bombing alone is not going to change too much. It should take out production facilities (missile making, drone making, nuclear enrichment) that are not deeply buried, but the enemy will soon move everything there. Its what the Germans did in WW2. Unless the site is occupied, you can only set back manufacturing, not end it.

I think our best hope right now is for a civil war in Iran. We are evidently working with the Kurds in the Northwest of Iran, the Baluchi's in the eastern part of Iran, and with Shia minorities (along the Kuwait/southern Iraq border). In addition, it would be great if some of the regular Iranian military were to mutiny and fight against the IRGC. We also need to find a way to arm civilians so they can take on the Basij militia arm of the IRGC. Yes, this turns Iran into a basket case ala Syria for years.

It is just made all the worse by the fact that this action, which was definitely needed, was delayed for so so long. We should have acted back in the 1980s. If not over the embassy hostages, then over the Beirut bombings. At a minimum when they started to pursue nuclear technology.

As expected, the Iranians have said to have closed the Straits of Hormuz. Looking at maritime traffic maps, nothing is moving through there right now. Trump has authorized the insuring of shipping by the US government and the escort of shipping through the area, but I am not seeing anything moving yet. One ship hitting a mine and I think shipping will stop for quite a while. And yes, that would be an economic disruption the world is definitely not prepared for.

The other is destruction of oil facilities. While the Iranians strike at such vulnerable targets in their neighbors, their neighbors are vowing to retaliate. The IRGC at this point has nothing to lose by attacking Saudi/Kuwaiti/other Persian Gulf state facilities, as they are completely unable to export anything themselves, so their refineries and wells are no longer an asset.

The missile threats to Israel and others should soon be over, as the Iranians do have a limited stockpile, plus we are destroying launchers they need to use them with. But as Ukraine has shown, drones are another matter. They are going to continue to manufacture and use drones. Against oil facilities and against shipping.

The IRGC isn't going to roll over and give up their power and wealth. Unfortunately, bombing alone isn't going to fix it. Hopefully, Iranian opposition on the ground can, but it will be a slog.

Getting back to the original point, any minor foreign war strains the American body politic. The longer they go on, the worse this becomes.

BUT, when America itself is attacked, the majority (if not vast majority) rally to the flag and live up to the expectations of their forefathers. The US Constitution is still valid, and still the best form of government on earth.

Top