Generational Dynamics Forum - New Site

John,
Guest and I agree. I already shed blood in this battle. Good friends are living in the midst of town trashed and criminalized by illegal invaders.
Uppermost to me is that I do not subscribe to international law. However uncivilized you may consider that to be, I am an American conservative Christian who was born a Jew and have lived a full unusual life. We were a country of laws under a Constitution. Reclaiming our heritage is an uphill climb. The first step will be to re-establish law enforcement and justice. And the illegal invader occupiers are first on the list.
Anyone who cares deeply for the border crossers is more than welcome to repatriate with them and help their lives. I point out that one of the Mexican presidential candidates is campaigning on that very subject.
The boat people should be returned to Libya, the traffickers arrested and imprisoned. They are beneath contempt as is Soros.

[quote="John"][quote="sue"]
> The indigenous residents have every right to reject uninvited
> invaders.[/quote]

I'm going to respond to only one thing - your phrase "every right."

In fact, international law specifically contradicts this in many
circumstances. States have a collective duty to provide humane
outcomes. In many cases, such as refugees fleeing from war and
violence, nations have no right to summarily reject uninvited
refugees.[/quote]
What about all the people who have been raped, robbed, and murdered by refugees? The migrants are a massive source of crime. Austria was safe in the 80s (I remember). The migrants started flooding in during the 90s; this latest wave is the worst (so far). School girls can no longer walk home safely. These crimes are real. Our misery is real. Do the lives of Europeans mean nothing? The '500' million number you throw around includes Eastern Europe. These countries have taken in very few migrants (if any). The majority of migrants who have been sent East immediately move to Sweden or the UK or elsewhere in Western Europe.

It's also more than just 'one million migrants'. There are millions, even tens of millions, that have arrive din the last 25 years.

You are wrong.Europe has to kick these people out or we will be destroyed.

[quote="sue"]
> The indigenous residents have every right to reject uninvited
> invaders.[/quote]

I'm going to respond to only one thing - your phrase "every right."

In fact, international law specifically contradicts this in many
circumstances. States have a collective duty to provide humane
outcomes. In many cases, such as refugees fleeing from war and
violence, nations have no right to summarily reject uninvited
refugees.

John:
Nowhere do I see addressed the solution of repatriating boat people accompanied by those who champion their causes. Now Doctors Without Borders is chiming in...people who choose to serve nomad fashion. Their choice.
Europeans hold the ground. The indigenous residents have every right to reject uninvited invaders. Residents are those who must subsidize and endure camps of foreign cultures. Decisions are made by those who do not share the invader experience pain.
With 50,000,000 occupiers here, those affected by the invaders have every right to share advice about preventing unwanted population resettlements. We have after all worked to raise families, maintain homes and embrace communities. No one asked us nor the Europeans to be reception centers, linguists and social workers. What we and they have become are unwilling and increasingly angry victims.

Europe has 500 million people, and could easily find a way to absorb
one million migrants (0.2%) if the political will existed. The
political will existed in the decades following WW II because the
survivors of WW II understood that xenophobia and nationalism lead to
a world war. That was the justification for the 1957 Treaty of Rome.
Today those survivors are all gone, and xenophobia and nationalism are
in control of the younger generations today, so the political will no
longer exists, as Europe and the world head for World War III.

And yes, sinking boats and letting migrants drown would not only
destabilize Europe but would be an absolute disaster.

Guest:
A braced salute to you. Simple and direct. And Libya of all places. :D

These rescue ships should be impounded and their crews arrested. The refugees should all be returned to Libya immediately. I see homeless white people everywhere, my people. I don't care what happens to any of these migrants, They destroyed their countries, and now they want to destroy ours.

Both Mill and Goose present clinical evidence fully observable in America's sanctuary cities. To properly demonstrate, the 600+ "migrants" should be immediately drop shipped and abandoned center stage in the UN General Assembly's midst.
How charitable for NWO elites to gift others with 3rd world settlers.
Human trafficking is the problem here. Soros and every liberal have hands in this money making scam using humans as decoy/victims. When playing human chess, all but the scammers are victims. The solution is ALWAYS to return to sender. Do not play the game. We all lose.

Real destabilization comes from having millions of settlers entering your country with out the ability of ever fitting in or wanting to assimilate. Small numbers of immigrants works or can work. Millions are not immigrants no matter what anyone says they are settlers. If you have any questions about this read the history of Rome after the borders were left unsecured. And later in history read about the Americas when the European settlers arrived and how happy the "Indians" residents became after the first few turned into millions. Look to Sweden now the rape capital of the world; it only took a few years to go from close to last place to first.

"Destabilizing", John do you really believe this nonsense? The only way to save Europe is to keep these migrants out via any means! Sink the boats! As we must do in the US on the Southern border, we need the military there to shoot to kill if needed. The trash of the 3rd world must be kept out of white nations.