by FishbellykanakaDude » Sun Jan 14, 2018 4:36 pm
John wrote:It's an important distinction because language rules evolve from
speakers, while spelling rules are codified by so-called experts.
Thus, a lot of people say "a whole nother" without thinking about how
it's spelled, and one can debate whether splitting a word like that in
spoken language is not ok, just as it's theoretically not ok to
gratuitously split an infinitive. It's also worth noting that English
is a Germanic language, and in German, words and infinitives are split
and moved around all the time.
I love linguists,.. and those who deal with "code" are, by definition, linguists (Probably the best, and worst, linguists). I fancy myself a LONGtime amateur linguist, and super-amateur coder, so, yeah, (your) insights (are) appreciated.
What're your thoughts on "contextual autocomplete" in IDEs? I love 'em, 'cuz my memory for low frequency vocabulary rather sucks.
Anyway, the organic language of "the locals" is MUCH more interesting to me than it's orthography, except where the spelling rules are geared toward accurately describing the spoken language. That's why "odd" languages like Gaeilge (Irish) and HCL (Hawai'ian Creole Language, or Hawai'ian Pidgin) are my "passion" (however low-grade that passion may be). Conlangs are fun too, of course.
But the "flexibility" of English, it's noun-ifying verbs and verb-ifying nouns for example, make it both a dream and a horror show. I like dreams and horror shows, so that's just fine with me.
And to NOT non-gratuitously split some infinitives (which IS splitting the "to split" infinitive!) is actually painful, so it's not NOT happening! "Illustrative" double negatives are also quite fun!
Aloha a me mahalo! <shaka!>
[quote="John"]It's an important distinction because language rules evolve from
speakers, while spelling rules are codified by so-called experts.
Thus, a lot of people say "a whole nother" without thinking about how
it's spelled, and one can debate whether splitting a word like that in
spoken language is not ok, just as it's theoretically not ok to
gratuitously split an infinitive. It's also worth noting that English
is a Germanic language, and in German, words and infinitives are split
and moved around all the time.[/quote]
I love linguists,.. and those who deal with "code" are, by definition, linguists (Probably the best, and worst, linguists). I fancy myself a LONGtime amateur linguist, and super-amateur coder, so, yeah, (your) insights (are) appreciated. :)
What're your thoughts on "contextual autocomplete" in IDEs? I love 'em, 'cuz my memory for low frequency vocabulary rather sucks.
Anyway, the organic language of "the locals" is MUCH more interesting to me than it's orthography, except where the spelling rules are geared toward accurately describing the spoken language. That's why "odd" languages like Gaeilge (Irish) and HCL (Hawai'ian Creole Language, or Hawai'ian Pidgin) are my "passion" (however low-grade that passion may be). Conlangs are fun too, of course.
But the "flexibility" of English, it's noun-ifying verbs and verb-ifying nouns for example, make it both a dream and a horror show. I like dreams and horror shows, so that's just fine with me. :)
And to NOT non-gratuitously split some infinitives (which IS splitting the "to split" infinitive!) is actually painful, so it's not NOT happening! "Illustrative" double negatives are also quite fun!
Aloha a me mahalo! <shaka!>