12-Aug-17 World View -- China and India prepare for border war at Doklam Plateau

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) ;) :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen: :geek: :ugeek:

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: 12-Aug-17 World View -- China and India prepare for border war at Doklam Plateau

Re: 12-Aug-17 World View -- China and India prepare for border war at Doklam Plateau

by Guest » Sat Sep 02, 2017 1:02 am

FishbellykanakaDude wrote:
Guest wrote:
FishbellykanakaDude wrote:
Are you "Huh?"-ing the questions preceded by "The question(s) to you is (are):", or the meaning of "mahalo"? :)
You don't dazzle me with your writing. I mean what I say.
I believe you do. :) "Huh?" means you have a question about someone elseʻs question or statement, but would rather not bother asking a well formed question yourself.

I always assume that people say precisely what they mean to say. "Huh?" is pretty much what Iʻd expect from Homer Simpson. <chuckle!>

..anyway, I actually am interested in your answers to the questions I asked. If you want to continue the conversation, the ballʻs in your court.

Aloha nui dude (or dudette). Mahalo īa ʻoe!
I don't like glib and ridiculous people. You enjoy the sound of your own voice too much. Conversation with someone like you is pointless. Perhaps you could apply for work as a panelist on CNN?

Re: 12-Aug-17 World View -- China and India prepare for border war at Doklam Plateau

by FishbellykanakaDude » Fri Sep 01, 2017 4:04 pm

Guest wrote:
FishbellykanakaDude wrote:
Guest wrote:
Huh?
Are you "Huh?"-ing the questions preceded by "The question(s) to you is (are):", or the meaning of "mahalo"? :)
You don't dazzle me with your writing. I mean what I say.
I believe you do. :) "Huh?" means you have a question about someone elseʻs question or statement, but would rather not bother asking a well formed question yourself.

I always assume that people say precisely what they mean to say. "Huh?" is pretty much what Iʻd expect from Homer Simpson. <chuckle!>

..anyway, I actually am interested in your answers to the questions I asked. If you want to continue the conversation, the ballʻs in your court.

Aloha nui dude (or dudette). Mahalo īa ʻoe!

Re: 12-Aug-17 World View -- China and India prepare for border war at Doklam Plateau

by Get out of the way » Fri Sep 01, 2017 9:48 am

America needs to bomb North Korea before they launch a nuclear attack on American soil. Carthage must be destroyed.

Re: 12-Aug-17 World View -- China and India prepare for border war at Doklam Plateau

by Guest » Fri Sep 01, 2017 5:30 am

FishbellykanakaDude wrote:
Guest wrote:
FishbellykanakaDude wrote:
..someone has too much time on their hands. <chuckle!>

The question(s) to you is (are): Why now? What makes starting open hostilities now more "non-boring", or "advantageous" to you? Why the impatience, and why the "rush"?

I'm sure you've got some well reasoned arguments for these questions. Let's hear them.

Mahalo dude, or dudette, as the case may be! <shaka!>
Huh?
Are you "Huh?"-ing the questions preceded by "The question(s) to you is (are):", or the meaning of "mahalo"? :)
You don't dazzle me with your writing. I mean what I say.

Re: 12-Aug-17 World View -- China and India prepare for border war at Doklam Plateau

by FishbellykanakaDude » Thu Aug 31, 2017 9:38 pm

Guest wrote:
FishbellykanakaDude wrote:
Guest wrote:Get on with the war already. This is starting to become boring.
..someone has too much time on their hands. <chuckle!>

The question(s) to you is (are): Why now? What makes starting open hostilities now more "non-boring", or "advantageous" to you? Why the impatience, and why the "rush"?

I'm sure you've got some well reasoned arguments for these questions. Let's hear them.

Mahalo dude, or dudette, as the case may be! <shaka!>
Huh?
Are you "Huh?"-ing the questions preceded by "The question(s) to you is (are):", or the meaning of "mahalo"? :)

Re: 12-Aug-17 World View -- China and India prepare for border war at Doklam Plateau

by Guest » Wed Aug 30, 2017 6:01 am

FishbellykanakaDude wrote:
Guest wrote:Get on with the war already. This is starting to become boring.
..someone has too much time on their hands. <chuckle!>

The question(s) to you is (are): Why now? What makes starting open hostilities now more "non-boring", or "advantageous" to you? Why the impatience, and why the "rush"?

I'm sure you've got some well reasoned arguments for these questions. Let's hear them.

Mahalo dude, or dudette, as the case may be! <shaka!>
Huh?

Re: 12-Aug-17 World View -- China and India prepare for border war at Doklam Plateau

by FishbellykanakaDude » Tue Aug 29, 2017 9:16 pm

Guest wrote:Get on with the war already. This is starting to become boring.
..someone has too much time on their hands. <chuckle!>

The question(s) to you is (are): Why now? What makes starting open hostilities now more "non-boring", or "advantageous" to you? Why the impatience, and why the "rush"?

I'm sure you've got some well reasoned arguments for these questions. Let's hear them.

Mahalo dude, or dudette, as the case may be! <shaka!>

Re: 12-Aug-17 World View -- China and India prepare for border war at Doklam Plateau

by Guest » Tue Aug 29, 2017 1:11 pm

On Israeli TV (i24) today, the talking heads were calling Kim Jun un a "rational actor". I kid you not. The Israelis say they don't see a war coming. The talking head was a writer with a very odd accent from a magazine called "The Diplomat". I've never heard of it. Where do they find these people?

Re: 12-Aug-17 World View -- China and India prepare for border war at Doklam Plateau

by Guest » Mon Aug 28, 2017 8:47 pm

Get on with the war already. This is starting to become boring.

Re: 12-Aug-17 World View -- China and India prepare for border war at Doklam Plateau

by DaKardii » Mon Aug 28, 2017 12:13 pm

John wrote:
FishbellykanakaDude wrote: > John,.. whatcha think of a "trade of crises", where China trades
> "containing Little Kimmie from playing with his toys" for the US
> "containing India to allow China to pass"?

> The Chinese HAD to know that that road would cause this kerfuffle!
> Could NK have been INSTRUCTED to get whacky by the Chinese simply
> to have a bargaining chip to "buy" the road permit through the
> Doklam?
Actually, I believe that the Chinese were completely surprised by what
happened. They expected to annex Doklam Plateau easily, by
overwhelming Bhutan's army. It should have been quick and easy, and a
great thing for Xi Jinping to brag about at the November Communist
People's Congress.

What China didn't expect was the intervention of India's army. Now Xi
Jinping is backed into a corner, and threatened with major humiliation
unless he starts a war with India, and he may be humiliated by that as
well.
Xi Jinping may well have committed the greatest foreign policy blunder in modern Chinese history with this crisis in Bhutan. Just one week before the crisis began, India and Pakistan became members of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. This event was hailed a major victory by both China and Russia, who have been trying to sell the SCO as the organization that ensures peace in Eurasia and serves as a counterweight to the West for years. Now, that narrative is on life support. If the SCO isn't enough to prevent war among Eurasian nations, then Russia no longer has any reason to see China as an ally against the West. This could very well be the event that results in the Chinese Politburo arguing amongst themselves over "Who lost Russia." This may well be the turning point that pushes Russia back towards the United States for the upcoming Clash of Civilizations war.

Top