josa0512 wrote:
>   Dr. Xenakis, You wrote "ISIS entered the big Russian-Syrian T-4
>   air base outside the town, carrying off substantial quantities of
>   Russian armaments including assault rifles, ground-to-ground
>   missiles, anti-tank missiles, and anti-air rockets."
>   I'm curious, what is your source for this information?
>   Based on what I've read, ISIS captured the armaments and weapons
>   when they captured Palmyra and the surrounding area.  Immediately
>   after recapturing Palmyra, ISIS laid siege to the Tiyas (T-4) air
>   base and were able to damage 3-4 aircraft with mortar and rocket
>   fire, but I haven't seen any credible sources that report that
>   ISIS actually breached the defenses of the Tiyas air base.  The
>   only sources that I can find claiming that ISIS captured the T-4
>   air base is bellingcat.com and syria.liveuamap.com but those
>   sources are wrong and that information is false.  It is true that
>   ISIS attacked the T-4 air base but their attack was repulsed and
>   the SAA still controls the T-4 air base.  I just wanted your
>   Generational Dynamics weblog to be as accurate as possible.
>   If ISIS did succeed in capturing the T-4 airbase (which is the
>   largest air base in Syria), this would indeed be a major military
>   development in the Syrian Civil War but this has not happened yet.
>   Bashar al-Assad still controls the T-4 air base and always has,
>   unfortunately.  During the Syrian Civil War, neither the rebels or
>   ISIS have ever managed to capture the T-4 air base.  ISIS
>   previously captured the Taqba air base, which is near the Tiyas
>   T-4 air base.
As indicated by the quoted sentence that you extracted from
my article, I didn't say that ISIS "captured" the T-4 base.
I said that ISIS "entered" the T-4 base.  That's completely
consistent with what you're saying, that the attack was
repulsed.
However, the main point to be made was that ISIS captured a
collection of weapons.  That's supported not only by the Debka
article, but also by the Guardian article that my article
links to.
I guess that there's a semantic issue as to whether the warehouse
from which the weapons were stolen was or was not officially
part of the T-4 base, but that question probably isn't as important
as the fact that tht weapons were stolen.