15-Sep-13 World View -- Hindu nationalist nominated in India

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) ;) :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen: :geek: :ugeek:

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: 15-Sep-13 World View -- Hindu nationalist nominated in India

Re: 15-Sep-13 World View -- Hindu nationalist nominated in I

by gerald » Sun Sep 15, 2013 6:58 pm

John wrote:
gerald wrote:In you masthead you state "If we have any bias at all, it's that we're pro-American." The question is who is the "WE"? I have assumed that you have running this site alone, confused.
It's the "Royal We".
interesting

Re: 15-Sep-13 World View -- Hindu nationalist nominated in I

by John » Sun Sep 15, 2013 2:32 pm

NoOneImportant wrote:Those who run out of intellectual ammunition always resort to personal vilification when they are empty. Only the inexperienced take the bait.
Unfortunately, "Barking Dog" is typical of the mainstream media.

Re: 15-Sep-13 World View -- Hindu nationalist nominated in I

by NoOneImportant » Sun Sep 15, 2013 2:16 pm

Those who run out of intellectual ammunition always resort to personal vilification when they are empty. Only the inexperienced take the bait.

The approach was appropriate: don't lose focus, ignore the attack, re-focus upon the issue, restate the question and ask for a rational answer. The point of the discussion is the issue under consideration, that is the point in question, not you or him.

The truth is a difficult thing for many to consume, when at a loss to carry on an intellectual argument, rather than assess, or reassess their position they choose to deflect attention from an intellectually untenable position by: "... because I said so..."; or by initiating a deprecating personal attack - which is the same thing bearing camoflage. Always stay on topic; politely ask for an answer to the item under consideration. People do change; at one time before he met Milton Friedman at the University of Chicago, there was no one a more dedicated RED than Thomas Sowell, or even David Horowitz, for that matter. Neither you nor I can change him, but he can change himself if he chooses to earnestly, and honestly reflect upon what he believes.

Re: 15-Sep-13 World View -- Hindu nationalist nominated in I

by John » Sun Sep 15, 2013 1:40 pm

gerald wrote:In you masthead you state "If we have any bias at all, it's that we're pro-American." The question is who is the "WE"? I have assumed that you have running this site alone, confused.
It's the "Royal We".

Re: 15-Sep-13 World View -- Hindu nationalist nominated in I

by NoOneImportant » Sun Sep 15, 2013 1:38 pm

Although I must add... not all user comments prove to be that useful... guess he didn't care much for the suggested reflection huh? :D

Re: 15-Sep-13 World View -- Hindu nationalist nominated in I

by gerald » Sun Sep 15, 2013 1:20 pm

John --question, this in regards to the "barking dog" comments.-----

In you masthead you state "If we have any bias at all, it's that we're pro-American." The question is who is the "WE"? I have assumed that you have running this site alone, confused.

I am also assuming that your bias is toward the "American" ideal and not members of the government or the government as such. ( reality such as it is vs. the ideal ) I see no problem with this and think this is a very objective approach.

cheers

Re: 15-Sep-13 World View -- Hindu nationalist nominated in I

by John » Sun Sep 15, 2013 11:56 am

Barking dog wrote:Nice..... guess you aspirations are to anchor Fox News. Fair and balanced. Yor rebuttals are worthy.
Well, at least now you're finally letting on what bias you imagine I
have. The reason that you're a moron is because you make baseless
accusations, and then when asked to explain then, you jump into the
sewer with fatuous name-calling. You come into this forum
anonymously, and you don't have the guts to defend your substance-free
ideological accusations. Well, I'll say this: your handle "Barking
Dog" appears to match your personality and intelligence, so it was a
very good choice.

Re: 15-Sep-13 World View -- Hindu nationalist nominated in I

by Barking dog » Sun Sep 15, 2013 11:48 am

Nice..... guess you aspirations are to anchor Fox News. Fair and balanced. Yor rebuttals are worthy.

Re: 15-Sep-13 World View -- Hindu nationalist nominated in I

by John » Sun Sep 15, 2013 10:58 am

Barking dog wrote:If you are unaware of your bias, I pity you. If you are aware of your bias, then you are a coward to deny it.
Moron

Re: 15-Sep-13 World View -- Hindu nationalist nominated in I

by Barking dog » Sun Sep 15, 2013 10:56 am

If you are unaware of your bias, I pity you. If you are aware of your bias, then you are a coward to deny it.

Top