Generational Dynamics World View News

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) ;) :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen: :geek: :ugeek:

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Generational Dynamics World View News

Re: Generational Dynamics World View News

by Navigator » Thu Nov 12, 2026 5:20 pm

I have been watching with intense interest the latest reports out of Ukraine.

I tend to watch the following on You-tube:
The Military Show
United24

They are both obviously pro-Ukrainian, but they are showing a good bit of detail of what is going on.

Western Militaries are almost wholly unprepared for the type of warfare now going on in Ukraine. Technology, specifically drones, have advanced so far that the tactics and most logistical operations used by world armies outside of the Russo-Ukraine conflict are now woefully obsolete.

Right now the only armies with practical experience with how war is now fought are Ukraine and Russia.

The casualty rates are starting to approach those of the most bloody wars ever fought.

In WW1, mobilization into the French Army meant that there was about a 60% chance of becoming a casualty (15% chance of death). In the infantry, you could basically plan on dying.

In the US Civil War, joining the Union Army meant about a 20% chance of being a casualty. If you were in a combat unit and showed up at a large battle (a la Gettysburg), the chance of becoming a casualty was between 33 and 40%.

In the Ukraine War, I estimate that the Ukrainians have mobilized about 1.8 Million so far. Of those, 600 K have become casualties (of which 150 K are deaths). Hard to tell how many Russians have been mobilized, but they have suffered 450 K deaths (from a hack of the Russians own databases). So Ukraine war participation means a minimum of 33% chance of becoming a casualty.

On top of this, there is no good way to evacuate wounded from the front lines in Ukraine. There are no helicopter "dust-offs". It is taking roughly a couple of weeks to get a wounded soldier back to the Army Hospital. It takes longer for a soldier to get from the rear areas to the front lines. It is, for all intents and purposes, a high tech version of the Western Front in WW1.

Re: Generational Dynamics World View News

by Navigator » Thu Nov 12, 2026 5:06 pm

I would say that we are looking at a domestic insurrection while we engage in a full-on conflict with China.

BTW, the money trail for Antifa, Democratic Socialists of America, BLM, Code Pink, and a host of other disrupters, all lead back to China and the CCP.

Re: Generational Dynamics World View News

by tim » Thu Nov 12, 2026 12:40 pm

Jack Edwards wrote: Tue Nov 10, 2026 1:25 pm
Navigator wrote: Tue Nov 10, 2026 12:58 pm I should start posting again. I think my grieving period should end at this point and I should get back to posting concerning what is going on.
I don't think I should go back and try to "catch up", as that would be a lot of work, but I could start posting again based on current daily developments.
I've missed your posts Navigator, sorry for your loss. Very little has happened on this forum lately, a shadow of what it once was. If you post stuff, I'll read it. Regards, Jack
With the passing of John there hasn’t been anyone to continue carrying the torch.

I feel everything that needed to be said has been said and now were are along for the ride to watch Johns predictions come true.

Anyone can post predictions but I haven’t seen anyone post with the generational dynamics perspective.

That is what made John’s analysis interesting he just wasn’t posting personal beliefs that could be found anywhere.

I’m watching to see if our fourth turning becomes a civil war or if its still war with China.

Re: Generational Dynamics World View News

by Navigator » Wed Nov 11, 2026 11:59 pm

Trump's firing of Wiles and promotion of Miller to Chief of Staff is a definitive signal about how the next two years (or rest of the Trump presidency) will go. To say Miller is combative is putting it extremely mildly. I so absolutely no prospect of cross-aisle compromise about anything.

On the other side, the Dems do not seem to understand that endless congressional inquiries are not going to do anything. People will just not show up. Trump's Justice Dept won't prosecute them for doing so, and then Trump will pardon them (as he learned to do from Biden).

All of the political turmoil will only play into the hands of the Chinese.

Re: Generational Dynamics World View News

by NoMansLand » Wed Nov 11, 2026 12:05 pm

Navigator wrote: Tue Nov 10, 2026 12:58 pm I should start posting again. I think my grieving period should end at this point and I should get back to posting concerning what is going on.
I don't think I should go back and try to "catch up", as that would be a lot of work, but I could start posting again based on current daily developments.
You have my sympathies as well Navigator. I would be interested to hear your take on the progress of things as well.

Re: Generational Dynamics World View News

by Jack Edwards » Tue Nov 10, 2026 1:25 pm

Navigator wrote: Tue Nov 10, 2026 12:58 pm I should start posting again. I think my grieving period should end at this point and I should get back to posting concerning what is going on.
I don't think I should go back and try to "catch up", as that would be a lot of work, but I could start posting again based on current daily developments.
I've missed your posts Navigator, sorry for your loss. Very little has happened on this forum lately, a shadow of what it once was. If you post stuff, I'll read it. Regards, Jack

Re: Generational Dynamics World View News

by Navigator » Tue Nov 10, 2026 12:58 pm

I should start posting again. I think my grieving period should end at this point and I should get back to posting concerning what is going on.
I don't think I should go back and try to "catch up", as that would be a lot of work, but I could start posting again based on current daily developments.

Re: Generational Dynamics World View News

by tim » Mon Nov 02, 2026 2:11 pm

https://www.youtube.com/live/yGVHSCLGn7 ... kFyghWJ-5t
BREAKING: COUP IN POLAND UNDERWAY NOW! - GLOBAL WORLD ORDER IS UNRAVELING – w/ Neil Howe

Re: Generational Dynamics World View News

by tim » Tue Oct 20, 2026 5:43 pm

https://youtu.be/-PaZOR-at0o
Famed demographer Neil Howe, author of The Fourth Turning, has just finished writing a new book with practical advice on how to survive it.

If history is any guide, we need to prepare for:
1) a financial crash
2) political collapse, and
3) conflict among the great powers

In advance of the new book's availability to the general public, we discuss its key recommendation in this video.

Re: Generational Dynamics World View News

by tim » Tue Oct 20, 2026 10:10 am

https://eddowdbeyondthenarrative.substa ... of-central
When the Central Bank of Central Banks Sounds the AI Alarm...Investors Should Listen!

Bank for International Settlements Bulletin 137 quantifies the circular financing loop between AI firms and draws the same Cisco/Lucent/Nortel parallel seen in early 2000sTelecom bubble
On October 1st the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) published bulletin Number 137 titled “Circular relationships among AI firms.” The bulletin quantifies something many of us watching the AI capex boom have been pointing out for months that a large and growing share of investment flowing into AI firms is circular. Between 2021 and 2025, 28.7% of AI firms’ investment deal value went to other AI firms, and 55.2% of the capital coming into AI firms came from other AI firms. Even more striking, of the intra-AI investment deals, 16.1% by count and 46.4% by value also involved commercial supply-chain relationships between the same parties. Most of this is upstream, both compute and infrastructure, where a supplier finances its customer (or vice versa) while also selling it critical inputs.

The BIS states that these overlapping financing and commercial relationships are not accidental. They arise because of information asymmetries, scarce critical inputs, relationship specific investments, and the sheer scale of capital required before meaningful revenues appear. In theory, they can help solve firm-level contracting problems. In practice, as the BIS notes, they create macroeconomic risks around endogenous demand, correlated exposures, and opacity. In other words there are legitimate reasons why these ecosystems begin but as the pace of investment grows so do the risks. I have been making versions of these same points on X and in my Substack pieces on the AI infrastructure buildout.

The BIS bulletin defines and measures circularity and outlines a formal framework of the AI relationships. However, I will focus this discussion on summarizing the bulletin’s section on the macroeconomic risks titled Economic implications of circular investment relationships.

Top