Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) ;) :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen: :geek: :ugeek:

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by tim » Thu Jul 23, 2026 2:57 pm

https://youtu.be/xum_M-KiYJs
Edward Dowd joins Mark Moss to explain why he believes the recession has already begun, but most investors haven't recognized it yet. They discuss why the economy looks far weaker than the stock market suggests, why the AI boom could be the final credit bubble of this cycle, and how housing, China, private credit, and the bond market could determine what happens next. They also explore inflation vs. deflation, the Federal Reserve, excess mortality, demographic decline, government spending, and what investors should be watching over the next 12 months and beyond.
38:00 Ed talking about demographic trends and excess deaths

41:00 Ed saying excess mortality is here to stay for the next 5 to 10 years at least until 2030.

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by tim » Thu Jul 23, 2026 8:23 am

https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com ... ddenly-dee
In memory of those who “died suddenly” in the United States and worldwide, July 13-20, 2026

Bassist Jennifer Finch (L7, 59, C); pianists Jimmy Nichols, Rodney Franklin; hip-hop DJ Bigga Rankin; PBS programming exec Sylvia Bugg; baseballer Duane Ward; acting coach John Kirby; & more

A survey of the likely global toll of COVID “vaccination,” based on the reports collected by our worldwide team of researchers this past week.

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by tim » Wed Jul 22, 2026 9:50 am

https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/how ... -dont-want
how to not learn what you don't want to know
daszak covid edition
well, isn't that peculiar.

the guy who developed and funded the work that created the c-19 virus in a lab in china was set up for scrutiny by the FBI upon his return, in 2021, from the lab. in china. where the virus was created.

one can certainly imagine how some pointy questions might have presented themselves.

so they got to the bottom of it, right?

Gene Wilder Will Live On Through The 'Condescending Wonka ...


lol. nope.

they were told to stand down by some sort of higher up at customs and border patrol denizen within DHS or FBI (it’s not entirely clear which way that flowed based on these 2 docs, but the bottom one was sent first)

the docs just surfaced.

Image



apparently, getting a look at what he knew and what he was carrying was a no-no?

Image


huh. why, it's almost as if they knew the "lab leak" story was false all along...

this is why you cannot ever trust the state. they were actively running a disinfo campaign about wet markets, pangolins, and natural causes when they knew damn well that they had paid to make the virus and their own health agency, the NIH, was licensing the viral code to bioNtech (and thereby to pfizer) and to moderna to launch the most profitable per unit time products in pharma history.

they lied in public, under oath, to everyone except the FBI who they told “no arresting the al capaone of biotech, we do not want to see his hard drives.”

fox commission clears henhouse 5, film at 11.




then, 5 years later, it leaks under FOIA once it way too late and everyone has moved on

the pattern is so predictable as to be pedestrian.

they keep winning the bet of “we can be scummy longer than you can stay outraged.”

it is not possible to distrust and hate these people and the lapdog media that carries their dirty water with such prolific glee enough.

there is a thread here though:

here's what i want to know: "subject will be sent to the <redacted> for any requests."

who or what was redacted? that's the map to the culprit.

it’s not rocket science.

failure to chase that is complicity.

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by tim » Wed Jul 22, 2026 9:40 am

https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/ ... covid-mona
Christine Anderson, MEP: Covid mRNA Injections Will Be Remembered as History's Worst Crime Against Humanity

Anderson accuses governments of coercing public uptake despite known safety risks.
German MEP Christine Anderson maintains that the global rollout of Covid mRNA injections will be remembered as history's worst crime against humanity—accusing governments of coercing public uptake despite known safety risks.

"They knew. But they continued producing and forcing it on people anyway."

“And that’s why I maintain this whole mRNA injection campaign—forcing it on people, manipulating them, gaslighting them... will go down in history as the biggest crime to ever have been committed on humanity.”

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by tim » Wed Jul 22, 2026 9:38 am

https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/ ... -myth-that
Dr. Pierre Kory: "It is a Myth That Vaccines Are Safe and Necessary...If I Had Young Children Today, They Would Not Receive a Single Vaccine."

"...97% of SIDS deaths occur within 7 days of vaccination."
Dr. Pierre Kory, MD: “It is a myth that vaccines are safe and necessary.”

“If I had young children today, they would not receive a single vaccine.” Dr. Kory explains that Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) peaks at 2, 4, and 6 months of age — exactly when infants receive multiple routine vaccinations.

He states that the government refuses to perform true placebo-controlled safety trials on vaccines. Unlike other pharmaceuticals, which undergo 2–6 years of rigorous safety testing before FDA/CDC approval, vaccines have never been subjected to the same long-term, robust safety standards.

In clinical trials, safety monitoring for adverse reactions was extremely short:
Hepatitis B vaccine: Tested on only 147 infants/children and monitored for just 5 days before approval.

Hepatitis A vaccine: Monitored for 14 days.
Meningococcal (meningitis) vaccine: Monitored for 7 days.
Prevnar (pneumococcal) vaccine: Monitored for 7 days.
MMR vaccine: Followed for 42 days.
RSV vaccine: Monitored for 30 days.
DTaP / Tdap vaccines: Monitored for 14 days.
Gardasil (HPV) vaccine: Monitored for 14 days.

Crucially, no childhood vaccine has ever been tested against a true inert saline placebo. Trial “placebos” have instead used aluminum adjuvants or other vaccines:

Gardasil trial → placebo was Hepatitis A vaccine + aluminum adjuvant
Hepatitis A trial → placebo was Hepatitis B vaccine
Influenza trial → placebo was the other flu strain vaccine
Meningitis trial → placebo was DTaP
Pertussis trial → placebo was Tetanus + Diphtheria
Polio trial → placebo was diluted polio vaccine
Vaxelis (6-in-1) trial → placebo was DTaP + Polio + Hib + Hep B
Hepatitis B trial → placebo was aluminum adjuvant alone

Dr. Kory notes that countries with the most vaccines on their infant schedules have the highest infant mortality rates.

The United States gives more infant vaccines than any other industrialized nation — and has the highest infant mortality rate among them.

He further states that 97% of SIDS deaths occur within 7 days of vaccination.

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by tim » Mon Jul 20, 2026 2:39 pm

https://alixmayer.substack.com/p/did-c ... ally-exist
Did COVID Patient Zero Actually Exist? | Dr. James Miller | Ep 18

If you think you've heard it all about COVID and lockdowns, this episode will shock you.
In this explosive interview, surgeon Dr. James Miller exposes how the Everett, Washington hospital that allegedly received COVID Patient Zero from Wuhan morphed into a WEF-linked "Stasi" operation—hiding PPE, terrorizing employees with fake empty-bed media scares, and targeting whistleblowers with microaggression accusations. Meanwhile, the governor was working on secret plans for mandatory shots for driving.

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by tim » Mon Jul 20, 2026 9:40 am

https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/wha ... ed-america
What The US Senate Showed America About COVID-19 Vaccine Toxicity

COVID-19 vaccine injures are so common many of the legislators who pushed them have also been severely injured—but still won't admit it. This culture of silence around these injuries must end.
One of the things which has always fascinated me about the world is how certain invisible laws govern the “spontaneous” events that occur around us (e.g., radioactive decay). For example, to quote one friend after I remarked how surreal it’s been to see many of the malevolent things I’d read about humans doing throughout history emerge around us:

I feel the same way. It’s always so shocking to see, but it shouldn’t be. Genesis was written 3,500 years ago and there’s not a single human frailty described there that I can’t relate to.

In middle school, I was introduced to the bell curve (normal distribution) concept in statistics, which stated that with many sets of natural values or variable quantities, they will become exponentially rarer as you deviate from the mean value (e.g., men who are 6’8” are much rarer than men who are 5’8”) and for years, I marveled at how some invisible force was able to maintain this distribution as I noticed it again and again in the world around me.

Once I dove into medicine and health, it hence was apparent to me that a bell curve distribution existed for how people would react to toxicity and injury (much of which is likely due to the human body having a inherent but variable resistance to toxicity and injury along with an ability to heal from it). As such, when people are exposed to a toxic pharmaceutical or chemical, severe injuries will be rarer than moderate injuries, moderate injuries rarer than minor ones and subtle injuries most people rarely notice will be far more common than the minor ones.

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by tim » Mon Jul 13, 2026 7:02 pm

https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/wh ... ive-theory
What is Cancer: a Comprehensive Theory of Causes and Mechanisms.

Interview with Dr. Andrew Kaufman, and a collection of articles from multiple authors.
This post is a collection of my and other authors’ synergistic research on the true causes and mechanisms of cancer. These materials will demonstrate that cancer is ~99% preventable and avoidable condition, because it is an induced illness, not a naturally present one. Cancer is induced by “vaccinations”, i.e. injections of foreign proteins, “adjuvants” (metals and toxic chemicals), and many other dangerous substances that are contained in “vaccines” (intentional poisons). Once you understand this, cancer prevention is straightforward - one has to simply abstain from any vaccines or injectable products that contain typical vaccine ingredients (biologics and metals). If you understand this, you can quite reliably liberate yourself, your children or grandchildren from the risk of cancer.

For the majority of people (like me) who have received childhood and other vaccines - should you obsess about risks of chronic diseases, including cancer? NO! It is my personal heuristic view (although I can’t provide data for this) - those adults that had stopped all vaccinations over ~10 years prior, and have no serious chronic illness, lead healthy lifestyle, and maintain healthy mind (the most important part) - should not be concerned with cancer risk. This applies even to the mRNA shots, although of course, we are not yet at the 10 year mark. Still, those people who currently do not have chronic symptoms of anything, should not obsess over whether they got something from these shots or not. Don’t fall for another round of fear mongering, now from the “health freedom”. Time (and God) is on your side. Health, like everything else, begins in the mind. To protect your mind from professional fear mongering/entrapment techniques, I recommend to stay out of the conventional “Hellthcare” system as much as possible. Avoid unnecessary screenings of any kind. Only seek diagnosis if some serious symptoms are present.

The materials in this collection do not propose cures for cancer (because I am not a doctor, and I don’t offer treatments or protocols). However, accurate understanding of the true causes of a problem are the first 50% -75% of solving it. I am including my own articles, and several comprehensive essays by Lies are Unbekoming I highly recommend this publication.

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by tim » Mon Jul 13, 2026 6:49 pm

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/vide ... e-warning/
’60 Minutes’ – Swine Flu 1976 Vaccine Warning

By Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

I thought some of you kids ought to see what journalists once did for a living before Pharma bought the Media. Google recently signed a $700 million deal with GlaxoSmithKline, the world’s 2nd biggest vaccine maker. Google has its own vaccine companies working on developing a universal flu vaccines and other immunizations. The sordid buying and selling of American journalists is all in past; Pharma now owns all of them and they’re not selling.
Swine Flu Vaccine – CBS ’60 Minutes’ Transcript

Government Propaganda in Swine Flu Scare Causes Many Deaths

Below is the full transcript of the 1979 broadcast from the CBS investigative news program 60 Minutes on government propaganda around the 1976 swine flu scare.The program was aired on Sunday, November 4, 1979.

Only one person was killed by the actual flu, while hundreds filed claims of death of their loved ones from the massive vaccine campaign which was mounted. Key sections are highlighted in bold. To watch this video clip online, click here. For more reliable reasons not to trust the government when it tells you to take a vaccine, click here and here.

The Swine Flu Epidemic of 1976 inspired the vaccination of 40 Million people a little known fact was that those vaccinations caused devastating side effects to over 4000 victims. The frightening revelations about this event are the similarities with today.

Watch this video download it shows it to your friends and family. WE paid for these vaccines through our tax dollars. We must hold them accountable.

Swine Flu 1976

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by tim » Mon Jul 13, 2026 9:03 am

https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/how ... your-bones
How Modern Medicine Made Your Bones Brittle

Why the drugs that raise your bone density often leave you more likely to break, and the forgotten ways to restore the strength of bone.
Story at a Glance

•A gradual weakening of the bones which predisposes one to fractures is one of the most common and significant consequences of aging. Presently, to address it, we wisely try to head off bone loss in our younger years and routinely scan the density of aging bones so that a large volume of patients can be sold drugs to increase bone density.

•This approach is misguided because the data from those scans often does not correlate to the actual strength of the bones and because simply increasing bone density often creates brittle bones that fracture under stress. Additionally, the most commonly used drugs to address bone density are notorious for their side effects.

•Remarkably, medicine’s own data now shows that two-thirds of fractures happen to people who do not have osteoporosis, which means the number we have built this entire industry around is not the number that actually breaks bones.

•Anytime a large drug market exists (e.g., presently osteoporosis affects around 20% of women over 50), the medical industry will dismiss any approach to the condition which does not result in it being able to sell large amounts of lucrative medical services.

•Because of this, there is relatively little knowledge of the actual causes of osteoporosis or the most effective ways to restore the strength of the bones. The causes and treatments of osteoporosis, along with the specific things we use to restore the resilience (rather than merely the density) of bone, will be the focus of this article.
Sales Funnels

In my eyes, one of the most important business principles for understanding medicine are sales funnels, a method of selling products where you initially cast a wide net, and then successively cast smaller nets for increasingly expensive products after catching your initial customers.
Note: the term “funnels” is used to describe how the sales pipeline gets narrower as you move to more expensive products.

I typically see two types of (often overlapping) sales funnels in medicine.

The first works by normalizing giving an “innocuous” drug to broad swathes of people and then selling increasingly expensive pharmaceutical drugs to treat the complications many experience from those drugs. One of the most insidious ones affects many of our girls and is one I’ve repeatedly tried to draw attention to:




Note: a good case can be made that many of the chronic illnesses our children suffer from now (which are very lucrative to “treat”) are a direct consequence of the ever increasing number of vaccines in the marketplace.

The second funnel works by recasting “preventative medicine” and “promoting health” as the task of screening for each person for conditions they are at risk for. The results from these universal screenings are then used to justify selling them medical services (e.g., drug prescriptions). Once that screening becomes normalized, the industry will then pivot to expanding the funnel and having far more services be sold. For example:

•What constitutes a “safe” blood pressure has been continually lowered, and as a result, more and more people are put on blood pressure medications. This in turn has created a variety of problems (discussed further here). For example, the elderly (due to the arteries calcifying with age) need a higher blood pressure for blood to reach the brain, and many hence suffer lightheadedness and catastrophic falls from their blood pressure being lowered.

•Since we started mass cholesterol screenings, what constitutes a “safe” cholesterol has also been continually lowered by the corrupt committees who create the guidelines doctors follow to practice medicine. For example, a widely used calculator which determines ones risk of a stroke or heart attack consistently concludes people are at a high risk of a heart attack and must urgently start statins, yet almost no doctor in practice knows that a 2016 study of 307,591 Americans discovered the calculator overestimates their risk by 5-6 times. Similarly, most doctors aren’t aware that beyond failing to benefit patients (in contrast to natural therapies which do improve heart disease), statins are also immensely dangerous drugs (discussed further here).

Note: the folly of this approach is highlighted by a trial which found removing on average 2.8 non-essential drugs from the elderly at one facility caused their 1 year death rate to go from 45%-21% and their hospitalizations that year to go from 30%-11.8%. As far as I know, there is no intervention on the market which offers a benefit comparable to this.

Top