Trevor wrote:Another component of that angle that I've heard are mercy killings. If you have a horribly wounded man and it's unlikely that they'll be able to save him, there were times where they were shot rather than have them suffer enormous pain before they died later. Of course, I've heard those stories about every war, not just WWII.
Higgenbotham wrote:He only discussed this stuff in detail with me when he knew he was dying. And I think the only reason with me in particular was because he had disowned his kids because in his words, "It costs me 50 bucks to say hello."
He only discussed this stuff in detail with me when he knew he was dying. And I think the only reason with me in particular was because he had disowned his kids because in his words, "It costs me 50 bucks to say hello."
Higgenbotham wrote: Two things I remember. One, he told me they killed their own soldiers that they deemed useless and a threat to the group (unable to pull their weight).
Reality Check wrote:Higgenbotham wrote: Two things I remember. One, he told me they killed their own soldiers that they deemed useless and a threat to the group (unable to pull their weight).
When you originally made the statement above it sounded like the opposite of fragging. Fragging when you are in the military, refers to killing an officer, usually a commissioned officer, and usually one who is leading you in combat. Very specific meaning and very well understood.
Return to Finance and Investments
Users browsing this forum: aedens, Google [Bot] and 0 guests